Member Info for westie50

Wise words Wideyed

I've just got 2 full ask @ 1554 and 1556. Three others @ 0.899p just before. I'll see if they show later.

Thanks gents. I might look to change

Now i've got a couple of full ask buys.

It's just nice to see some blue Bradis Thanks Devonian. I have lse L2. Not sure why those full ask buys aren't showing. Hopefully 0.90p will be taken soon

Fair enough Devonian. Just not showing on my L2, but one mm has just been knocked off at 0.90p so i'm sure that's valid.

AT 0.90p that is

Devonman - i don't see any full asks buys yet on my L2 but pretty close.

This is becoming a good trading stock for me. Hokey today again. Not sure about the long term prospect though. But they do have another drug under test. Just unsure whether todays price represents good value or not. Reluctant to commit any funds there apart from day trading.

At last full ask 0.85p paid. Too much to hope for a tick up I guess

Monarch - thanks for that. My thoughts exactly. You can’t discuss anything with someone who is always right. The one thing I do know is he has no tespect (unlike yourself) on this Board.

Rich you're clearly a person i can't reason with. There's a big difference between advertising and a few "wouldn't want to be out of this at the weekend" type posters. Again you're insulting my intelligence and that of other posters to think that. Are you really the only one on here who has never made an error and always invests correctly? i think not. I have admitted i (re) invested here at the wrong time, but that's my fault. But i know one thing, it was my decision and my decision alone to invest.

Sadly though Rich by making that statement you insinuated you were happy for pi's to lose money. I think you also fail to give credit for a lot of posters intelligence by making those statements. Whether you meant it or not, that's insulting. Do you not think anyone with a scrap of common sense would just ignore the blatant rampy posts? I'm certainly not going buy/sell on the say so of the misinformed few. The reason for the drop back to where we are now is due to the PG11a issue. Whilst the Strategic Review is not a factual change, it's a definite change in policy of the BOD's as they're looking at other ways to assist shareholder value. That's all in the mix as of now and no doubt will become clearer over the coming weeks.

Plus i'm happy to admit, i times my (re) investment here totally wrong after trading AST successfully a number of times. 1.6p average isn't looking so pretty now, but you live and learn.

Rich I have said many times i like reasoned discussion be it negative or positive. What wasn't liked by me and many others on here when you indicated you wanted the sp to go back down to 0.80p ish, presumably so you could take position again. There's many stocks i'm watching where i'm hoping for the sp to go down, but I don't make it public.

I don;t always see eye to eye with RTN but I think he's made a very valid comment in that 'airbourne' does come across very well and would be an asset to the group. Although i chose not to be involved myself, I do have a large vested interest here and would want to see a level headed approach to the group.

Fulmar - good morning. Believe it or not i enjoy 'reasoned' discussion as that's part of the reason I post on here. I have no problem with negative comments again as long as they're backed up with facts. I'll admit when i;m wrong and I have been many many times and will continue to be wrong in the future. It just gets to me when you have a few 'perfect' individuals who are apparently never wrong and always negative. What's unforgivable is when posters purport to want the sp to drop for whatever reason. Unforgivable. Anyway, my take on ARCM has always been a slow burner. Difficult to trade here which is why I have just held and will probably continue to hold for the long term. I actually agree with D14, in that whilst i won't sell my total holding, i'll probably top slice as i'm in the lucky position of being nicely in profit. Have a good day gents

Bacardi70 - was that it because last night you implied I wasn't honest. You need to explain as I take exception to be called 'not honest'

Bacardi70 - Maybe you can explain your post from 2058 last night when you mentioned my name.

I guess he's even more pi**ed off now that we're making money. Fortunately been on filter for a while.