Member Info for Valuefinder

Copperman - come on mate, that’s ridiculous. I hope the 300p was tongue in cheek, if not, then pls stop. Totally ridiculous. Let’s get to 5/6p first, then worry about higher than that when we get there.

Bewarethebrokers - if you read Sprott research note, it is clear that not all holes need to return mineralisation. This is due to the Geologic characteristics. They just need to show (generally) that the mineralisation is there.

For me, having Sprott explain the similarities to TEFLER gave me all I need to know and I have my price target firmed up. The mistake many make on AIM is that just as things become clearer, and share becomes safer but still with plenty risk/return ratio, people get out because they’ve made a few bucks. We all lose in AIM when some shares flop, so when a good’un comes along, need to make sure you reap the rewards to the max.

I’m staying put for a lot longer than the next results. Extent of discovery? JV? Blackhills? EG? So much more to this than just what we have currently. Hav has just reinvigorated this share, but in terms of market cap this is still way way below where it could be - a JV would put rockets up its bum, a good resource estimate will multiply the share price. Not to mention what could happen with a Blackhill discovery

Value

About the other projects which GGP has. They could be monsters too.

Those worried should take a chill pill, this RNS was expected (by all those who understand the company anyway), so, chill out, this will go only one way in the short to medium term if the results are as expected.

4p by end of Jan, that's what I want.... :)

I don’t, and that’s the point. If you read my post, I’m telling YOU that making such ridiculous comparisons with bitcoin, .com, etc is just silly. It’s apples and pears.,...

And just because you “preface with non ggp specific”, doesn’t mean you post makes any more sense than if it was specific. Just be a good boy and either contribute some knowledge (since you clearly seem to have some in mining), or let us gullible, clueless, gamblers be here.

Geo, not hero

What a ridiculous comparison.... bitcoin? Weed? You have heard of gold right, this thing you can hold, this thing which is used by a whole world as the precious metal to go to when sh8t hits the fan etc? If you “worked as a hero” your also appreciate the importance of people putting money to explore for it.

I agree with you that putting money in exploration companies is somewhat a gamble, but with all due respect, if no one puts their money in start ups, exploration, new ideas etc, we’d never have the large companies you so so smugly point out to be “investments”. I’m sure BP, Amazon, Google etc were also a gamble at some point in the past?

Finally, investing (or gambling) in GGP is a hell of a lot less of a gamble today than one year ago. Calculated risk in my view.

Silver? doh. I mean Copper.

Les hope for an RNS today

TIburn - how about the silver? I see plenty of £££ for that too. And I’d be happy if they had 10m oz let alone the figures you’re quoting.

Howaboutthat - it wasn’t my best, well behaved, post, but Jesus I’ve seen 100 times worse here. Weird.

Anyway, ggp holding it’s ground for now. Good o see. Hopefully news soon to not allow for negative sentiment to naturally filter here. :)

Morningsun - what the hell? What did I say to you mate? Just be a good boy and get out of the house, meet some new people and enjoy life, and get some fresh air. What a tool.

Condorlini - thank you. That’s reassuring.

RTC - tell me about it. I’ve noticed that. I know the positives, so I’m here to hear balanced views to make sure I don’t have rose tinted glasses on. But hey ho. That’s too much to ask.

Paddy - to be honest, the discussion about width came a few days before based on ggps published info. You just added to it. It was a good drawing so appreciate it, but my concern started before that. However, I clearly don’t have a huge concern otherwise I’d have sold and kept my mouth shut (I never comment on shares I don’t own and don’t try to bring it down (not that I can and beither is it possible). Anyhow, thanks for the drawing - good to visualise it.

I’m sorry but 50/100 or so is not exactly “far apart” is it? Rather than have a go at my view and concerns, why don’t you get your head out of your arse and think for a min.

What Paddy did and showed the other day is exactly what I’m worried about. As I said, for those who can read and understand English, having a thin but deep resource is more expensive and in my view may not be as good as having a 1000 metres wide and less deep resource. Some of you just can’t seem to understand that having concerns when you’re invested somewhere is part of considering the pros and cons of a company. Ffs, I’ve got £40k invested here and don’t need Your bull&&&t as in all honesty, you don’t matter to me.

Prospector - what a patronising w88ker. “Do my research?” - I’ve done my research and that’s what is causing me concern. “Watching short term price action” - who even mentioned that? Did you actually read my post? And as for “inexperienced investors” - well, there is a big difference between arrogance and stupidity and cautious.

By the way - only an idiot wouldn’t consider the wider market sentiment. You obviously haven’t been through the 2008 crash, or the sell off of 2011. Anyway who says gold (or any other) exploration companies are “the place to go” because of the gold price are dumb.

Pls don’t bother replying, Not interested in your patronising comments.

The only concern I have with Ggp, which Paddy has now visualised it in his arty work, is that the find is narrow and deep, which may be more costly to develop. I’ve been hovering over the sell button but considering the MMs were willing to take all of my fairly sizeable holding today in one go kept me in as I believe there is a porentially large order being filled. I’m still not 100% comfortable with all drills pretty much hitting the same spot at depth

Anyone has any views on potential width of find (assuming the current holes are almost the outer limits).

*warned people

Munchbox - it’s just a silly thing to say though isn’t it? My hard earned £ are in here so I know what I’m looking for and what I see as good or bad news. Funny how you have so much concern for us all.... I’ve never really gone to a different bb/share I don’t hold and through pure kindness earned people to be careful for their investment which THEY have researched, they have made a decision based on THEIR strategy. It’s pathetic mate, really is.

To have so many people concerned for my wealth and wellbeing here. Thank you all for showing me the light..... I have just sold because munchbox says it’s a scam, LB28 things it’s fishy etc. Thank you, really appreciate your concern.

Toburn This is all I need mate. If grades here are half as good as we’ve seen already, we are laughing. HAD006-9 focused on an area SE of HAD001 and angled back towards it HAD006 � Huge 363m total of visible mineralisation, continuing to end of hole HAD007 - 237m total , continuing to eoh HAD008 - 90m total continuing to eoh HAD009 - Massive 434m total mineralisation as described, continuing to eoh

Munchbox - plonker is a polite way of putting it.