Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
If things don't work out, it may be worth having the certificate so that you can frame it and have a conversation piece for a dinner party one day. Not sure it's worth paying £100 for that alone.
Hopefully one of the brokers will tell us the pros and cons of having the certificate, given the company's circumstances.
The company has to maintain a register of shareholders. If a third party won't do it, then the company has to bring that function in-house.
You don't need to have the register in-house to do a share buy back. I don't see why you've made that connection. There is a risk of putting two and two together and getting five :/
Going back a bit to my previous life at an asset manager, the answer is that the shares have to be held in the nominee account of an authorised and regulated ISA/SIPP manager. Authorised and regulated managers are recognised by HMRC to administer the relevant tax wrapper. Evraz is not an ISA/SIPP manager and neither are individual PIs.
So, you can't just ask your ISA/SIPP manager to transfer the shares from their nominee account to you in a certificated form without you loosing the benefits of the tax wrapper.
Apologies if things have moved on in the last few years but that is my understanding of how the tax wrapper operates. I'm going to continue to hold ISA shares with HL but I may ask to transfer shares held outside of tax wrappers into a certificated form, once I understand more about the risks/benefits.
The register of shareholders is maintained by a third party, Computershare, which specialises in the provision of this function. With a lot of shareholders, the company itself does not want to get bogged down with the work involved in maintaining the register.
What is concerning is that the registrar has given notice to Evraz. Evraz will be doing the work themselves, rather than appointing a new third party registrar. It may be that other registrars don't want the business. That could be due to reputational concerns or the risk of not getting paid in the future.
Why did Computershare give notice? Why didn't Evraz appoint a new registrar? Are Evraz set up to cope with the maintenance of the register? We could do with a bit more info. On the face of it, it's not good news.
4th August even :)
https://www.evraz.com/en/investors/events/
She probably wants to know more about that Martian invasion you mentioned...
Lawrence13 - when you hit rock bottom the only way is up. Take a break from this place. There are some genuinely vile people on here and the last thing you need is to be reading their posts right now.
I sunk everything I had into Evraz. Mentally I've written it off but the tiny little bit of hope I have that shares will trade again will (no doubt) end up being the final kick in the balls for me. But I'm not going to let it define my life and neither should you let this loss define yours. Talk to loved ones about what has happened and come up with a plan. Ignore the trolls on here.
Here's the difference. In Russia posting something that the authorities don't like can get you arrested, beaten and sent off to Siberia. Here, your posts get deleted and that's the beginning and end of it. You won't get the police knocking on your door and you can sleep at night knowing you're not risking your liberty in expressing your views (however warped they may be).
Now, get yourself over to Moscow and stand in Red Square holding up a placard that says "Stop the war in Ukraine". I bet you'll experience a disgraceful attack on free speach the likes of which you could never imagine. Go on, dare you...
The reason why the Russians living in Crimea and Dombas should have sold up and moved back to Russia is because they cared more for Russian culture than embracing the Ukrainian one. If they were that wedded to Russian culture, then there was a peaceful solution to their needs. They could have exercised their freedom and right to move to Russia.
What you seem to be suggesting is that it was more reasonable for the Russian backed separatists to engage in violence against the Ukrainian state in Ukraine instead. If commercial airliners like MH17 get shot down along the way, that's fine too. As long as they don't have to move or accept that they are no longer in the USSR, right?
Yeah, fight Ukraians in Ukrainian territory. Get big brother to come over and drive Ukrainians out of Ukraine, torture and murder civilians indiscriminately. That's got to be a better solution to the issue than relocating to a country where your own culture is celebrated.
The Scots can't be compared to the Russian backed separatist movement. You're not even trying with that one.
But our government won't and you can see why they wouldn't want to. This doesn't give the Scots the right to start shelling towns in England or the right to call on the EU to come over and fight their battles for them.
The people of Crimea and the Dombas had the option of selling up and moving to Russia, if things were that bad for them in Ukraine. It's a BS excuse for a land grab by Russia IMHO.
And a 51/49 split would have settled it and that would have been the end of it?
If the Ukrainian government was that currup, and a 51/49 split would have settled it, I'm sure the Ukrainian government would have fixed the outcome. You know, like some of their neighbours fixed these "democratic" votes in the past.
But a marginal win would not have put Russia off and a win for Ukrain would not have been accepted.
Since the Brexit vote, Scotland has proposed a second referendum on independence from the UK. Westminster said no.
Do you think that Scotland should be allowed a second referendum, now that they have been dragged out of the EU against the wishes of the overwhelming majority?
Or do you think they should shut up and be quiet?
Fat finger ^
It's two directors and the Co sec. Best to use link below.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/07784342/officers