Member Info for trillsg

Take a look at yellowsnows posting history. 4 stocks, 109 posts and not one of them positive. Either he has a very strange way of investing or has an ulterior motive.

JJAL

Do you post 24/7 because.

A You're invested and want to encourage others to sell so your shares are worth less?

B You are our saviour and have been sent to save the Earth from HNR?

C You were spiked and now bitter?

D You fancy this but would like it cheaper?

E Just a fruit?

JJAL. Did RP steal your girlfriend once?

That made no sense at all. A tenth of £2.60, then I'd retire :)

Correction 2.6p

Their broker, Northland, had a target of £2.60. We've had dilution since then but even halving that shows what's possible if they pull things off. In fact dilute it by 10 and I'll still be retiring.

Last one I promise.

If anyone is questioning the developer's credentials, page 22

https://issuu.com/aspermont-aust/docs/amm_1710_2017-october

Australia's Mining Monthly (AMM) is the premier mining publication for those working in the operational side of mining.

Oh and if they feel there is better value in not being tied to the Faraday scheme, there's no reason why the couldn't use it for their Hyperleach nickel project.

But back toLithium,

Preliminary discussions with potential partners in the UK, rest of Europe and Australia are underway with a view to increasing the funding available for development stages subsequent to the initial 'proof of concept' stage from both private and governmental sources. A further announcement will be made when new arrangements are in place.

I take it back, better start panicking SQM.

Rns:

The JV will now additionally investigate reducing the complexity and cost of the conversion process from mineral to battery grade lithium carbonate and/or hydroxide.

omg4, folks are wising up to the fact we may have results on a technology that that will make hard rock mining as cheap as brine and produce a product in weeks, not years. You and me already knew that though.

Maybe Broadbent has been gobbing off at the LME meeting or Wardell employees giving themselves a personal bonus. either way looking good.

Personally hoping for a lot more than that Jarem. 0.18p was reach just on anticipation. Their next Lithium announcement will have actual audited results with possibly a producer or Government (Faraday) backing.

7th on the risers board on no news. Investors returning before the announcement? Can see a steady climb coming as it did in the weeks before the last trial results were expected (0.18p)

Welcome back Potter and good luck.

That read as bad for sqm, I meant they'll be snowed under with work.

Lithium is found in very low concentration
in igneous rocks. The largest
concentrations of lithium-containing
minerals are found in granitic pegmatites.
The most important of these minerals
are spodumene (Li2O, Al2O3. 4SiO2) and
petalite (Li2O, Al2O3. 8SiO2). Spodumene
has a theoretical Li2O content of
8.03%. Due to its high lithium content,
spodumene is considered the most
important lithium ore mineral. A typical
run of mine ore can contain 1-2% Li2O,
while a typical spodumene concentrate
suitable for lithium carbonate production
contains 6-7% Li2O (75% - 87%
spodumene). Higher grade concentrates
with 7.6% Li2O and low iron content are
used in ceramics and more demanding
industries.

From the RNS,

The spodumene (LiAlSi2O6) concentrate is typically sold to Chinese producers of lithium carbonate, who use a combined pyrometallurgical-hydrometallurgical ("pyro-hydro") flowsheet to produce a lithium carbonate (or hydroxide) product. The high cost of the pyro-hydro process remains the significant obstacle to the low cost production of lithium carbonate (or hydroxide) from spodumene.

So if our method works, the likes of these are in for a shock ,http://www.sqm.com/en/producto/carbonato-de-litio/ Mcap $12 Billion. (company based in Chile and the Worlds largest producer of Lithium carbonate/hydroxide)

Continents will be fighting over this, not companies.

Is that classed as a ramp?

I'll leave it at that.

Oh and are you telling me they don't talk to Wardell, as a paying customer, and ask, "How's it looking?"

To do a presentation on it 3 days ago says it all IMO.

Too true ICL. What would China be willing to pay to stop Europe from producing their own batteries cheaper than they sell them for. That thought excites me.

If they have funding options maybe they'll be reluctant to take the grant which would tie them up to the UK. Unless they make them an offer they can't refuse.