Firering Strategic Minerals: From explorer to producer. Watch the video here.
I wouldn’t mind being left with a CONSERVATIVE 500m barrels. If Exxon pays off our debt and pays for the wells, for 51% of the oil in the deeps and operator status. We get the remaining 49% plus the oil from the other assets.
I’m fairly sure Jiddy said he was green boxing me , moons ago.
I can’t remember the reason now. Although I suspect it was a misinterpretation of what I may have said. For the record, I have no doubts in my mind and neither should anyone else, that Art will achieve his second mid tier O&G company. And you can take that to the bank. I did have a premonition of it being Continental that takes us to £14 per share (hopefully still do as if Continental are named, then £14/share must surely follow…..what!). What I have noticed about Jiddy though is he has always come across as a straight up guy. I would also very much doubt, based on the way he posts ie as I’ve just mentioned that he would that invent a BS email response from Art and certainly not to add a secondary email with further, plausible clarifications from Art. Obviously all Imo
I would recommend any response to the losers post, is a repost of Arts reply to Jiddy. As a statement of fact from the CEO of a forthcoming billion dollar company. As opposed to the unsolicited fiction from a 10p a post investment ‘prophet’.
I’m by no means trying to trash Jiddy’s post as sounds exceptionally credible to me. But If there is an NDA in place. Why would Art be so blatant as to practically name Exxon in the paragraph regarding the JV and carbon capture? Asking solely for debating purposes
HFB - off topic for a mo. Always intrigued me but keep forgetting to ask. You’ve stated on numerous occasions it’s not rocket science but what you used to do was. So by the power of deduction. Was you a rocket scientist?
I’m pretty sure RS confirmed the find of 1 billion barrels. Albeit their find only covered a third of COPL’s land. So I would say it has been proven and is inline with what Art said.
I will have to bow to more knowledgeable regarding physical aspects as I’m not a pipe engineer. So much so that I’m not totally conversant of reasons/causes to these occurrences. I have however been involved in pipe pigging operations in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea for Statoil. These operations have been on occasion to clear wax deposits in flow lines.
SteveV - Just a minor adjustment to facts. They do/did know about the wax issue. Hence why Art came up with the solution of using condensate. As he has used this solution previously when he was in charge of his North Sea, billion dollar company. What they didn’t understand was why it waxed up so low down the well where friction temperatures are higher, so in effect should not have waxed up. Just saying :)
Artemi5 - I think you should post on here more often. Apart from the fact you probably give most a semi with your descriptive prose of your assets! You also show more balls than the whingeing fckuing girls on here of late. Isthisawinner? Of course it fckuing it is! Are you?No you’re a loser! Shouston-pull yourself together, or these pricks are starting to get what they want!!!
Jiff - I agree there is no specific mention of ‘RBL’ in the update. The mention of approach to and in discussions with US and international banks is the same rhetoric as before mentioned during updates and webinar when the term RBL was used in association with the same banks