Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
Draey - I would have done it there and then but couldn't figure out exactly where to start.
Like quite a few web sites, I reckon they're deliberately obtuse, so its difficult for anyone to find anything.
Like I say I'll give it another go during the week.
If I find out how to do it, I'll post it on here.
Its up to anyothers if they want to start their own ball running.
What I'm saying is that I am, whether it makes any difference or not.
I would think it would be difficult foe=r the FCA to ignore a number of reports from different people, especially if it all goes tits up later.
Uncanny - is any of that in an RNS? If not believe nothing.
And quite frankly I would even question it, if it were.
Until they can demonstrate they can be trusted, after their past history, information needs a helping of salt imo.
I too was banned for disrupting the BB and being argumentative with others posters.
However admin seemed to think it was ok for those other posters to be calling everyman and his dog, all sorts of derogatory names, without sanction.
Strange world.
I went on the FCA site the other day to see if I could report them for misrepresentation.
Not an easy site to figure out where to actually log a complaint.
I'll give it another go when I can.
Somethings got to change.
I'm not having them walk away with my money on the basis of the information they've presented.
Raty - All they want is an excuse to keep going on to phase III so that they can keep drawing their money every week.
If they stumble across something that works, then that'll be great.
But lets be honest dragging in £3k every week is a pretty good incentive for them to keep gong, whether it works or not.
Jonjo and Kane - There have been a number of posters who have been asking for the BOD to come clean for months and months. The great and good on here have defended them all of the way, stating that;
they can't buy shares as they're in a closed period,
they can't tell us they've entered in to an NDA because its a secret,
they can't give us any details on potential partners as they don't want to play one company off against another; and last thursday night, that they are on the cusp of a deal and can't provide details, just in case they say one wrong word.
My opinion is bollox to all of that. The BOD have been economical with the truth all along. Nothing has changed.
They are still sponging off of every shareholder and are not providing value for money.
There should be a re-evaluation of the members of the board, with heads rolling. Sack them for non performance.
I think you need to ask those that bought in many months ago if they feel positive.
The BOD can make everyone feel positive by presenting some ratified information.
Until then, imo, they can't be trusted to look after anyone's interest but their own.
if you read the previous posts it was mentioned that they should effectively sack one of the current team and replace them with someone effective. Cost neutral.
That's the problem with the six companies discussion, unless its official its meaningless.
I have absolutely no idea who anyone posting on this board is, where they live, or who they work for.
Them coming on here shouting about George telling them that the deals almost done and that its only a terrotiorial argument between two of the companies thats stopping things, is quite frankly ludicrous.
We're supposed to take the word of some random person no one knows.
Make it official, put it in an RNS.
I assumed he hitch hiked his way North, to save the poor old shareholder some of the expense,
Hopefully he booked hiself into the local youth hostel in a shared room, so overall it wouldn't have cost that much to be fair.Worth it though, don't you think.