The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Stt. What a load of bull. I would say the opposite. Many LTHs that have been supplying good research here for a great many years have withdrawn from the board because of bullying from the deramping gang. I haven't noticed any of the derampers withdraw. Now you appear from your antics on the advent board to continue your misinformation on this site.
GW. I have no intention of belittling you. I do not agree with you're view on settlement but that is not the point here. I only asked a sincere question so that I could verify your claim. You have asked the same question of others in the past when they have differing viewpoints from you.
Gw. I believe Morbox quoted the cfdd figure because it was close to the figure you quoted and is more risky than straight investing in shares. Therefore your figure does not ring true. Could you please let me know where you got your figure of 80% from.
GW if you are going to troll use facts. ..You are working very hard trying to tell us it will be more than a lower end settlement less a material compromise, legal fees of at least 50% and loan repayments.
It has already been reported that fees will be less than 50% for a low settlement figure as well you know.
Forgive me if I am wrong and apologies in advance if I am. If I remember rightly ME gave an extremely high high end figure when all this started. 13 billion rings a bell but cannot find the quote. If this is so anything less than half this will be towards the lower end of expectations. I do not expect several billion butt it is as likely as as a few 10s of millions quoted by some.
FH. "You don't value businesses based on speculative market projections, you value a business in its present form based on earning"
If this is true why was Nanoco sp at about 40p in 2017 long before litigation started. Many small loss making companies working towards profitability have larger mcap than Nanaco. Many huge businesses may make a loss one year and only dip slightly in sp. Nice try but wrong again.
FH. "The problem is it all sounds very quirky. Give me something tangible".
Futuristic is the only way for companies like Nanoco to go. There is no point in reinventing a black and white tv or instamatic camera. The company look to the future and future needs.
A few posts from yesterday talked about exclusive use licence to Samsung. I would like to think that the BOD have enough intelligence to realise if they signed that away it would be the end of Nanaco as it is the seeding process. Therefore no other company could make anything using any Nanaco process. Why it has appeared on this board I don't know. Doesn't make sense.
FH. I agree. But BT has always said a settlement will include global and future use. If that is the outcome it would be worth multiples of this. I am willing to wait for the next RNS. I could sell at a reasonable profit but believe/hope we will be rewarded for waiting. At the moment I am still trusting him to deliver.