The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Better article here, from site that doesn't sponsor the far right ;)
https://www.utilitydive.com/news/navajo-generating-station-buyer-backs-out-putting-coal-plant-future-in-dou/532960/
That's a much better site! Pulls data from one I've been looking at and makes it a lot more legible lol.
In case my last post was a bit hard to read, we have a mining plan in process for 560 acres of perlite, still pending, I guess for our actual proper full plan....
Want more? 'Course you do. done a search on everything 'SR Minerals' on https://reports.blm.gov/report/LR2000/2/Pub-All-Systems-Customer-Info shows permit stages etc. We have the perlite mining plan already in process on there, pending status, last action from March. We're also down on the as owner of claim AND operator<br /><br />01 07-23-1955;069STAT0367;30USC612 <br />Total Acres:<br />Serial Number<br />Case Type 380910: SURFACE MGT-PLAN MINING<br />560.000<br />NVN 096868<br />Commodity 440<br />: <br />PERLITE<br />Case Disposition: PENDING
Nice innit? My main point is if people are worried on PC bailing out or something, the company has done waaaayyyy too much to be randomly moving on, we've also had roughly an RNS a month for the last few months explaining where we're at. Now seen all the claims etc for myself I'll be buying more if I can find the money.
Further down we have
CSM 1 NMC1167973 ACTIVE MILLSITE 2018 2018-02-13 5
CSM 2 NMC1167974 ACTIVE MILLSITE 2018 2018-02-13 5
CSM 3 NMC1167975 ACTIVE MILLSITE 2018 2018-02-13 5
CSM 4 NMC1167976 ACTIVE MILLSITE 2018 2018-02-13 5
So we have basic claim in for millsite already! in terms of acreage CROW acreage is 1140 acres, CSL acreage is 1033 (these are labelled as LODE claims, guessing CS title means....CS project) GHL which are one of the new ones are 371 acres, also titled LODE and same acreage per unit as CS so guess it's more perl/pozz. MJP is 240 acres at 20 per unit.
If you want to look for yourself go to https://reports.blm.gov/report/LR2000/23/Pub%20MC%20Geo%20Index/ tick NV box, type of permit and customer is SR MINERALS in capitals, go to next and put in esmerelda county.
I'm just as bored hanging about as you lot are but look, there's a lot going on :)
Want some cool research? OK bear with me here. I found the exact site of CS project 38°14'52.0"N 117°37'05.6"W (scroll out a bit, look at the the little jink in road to right hand side, now look at map image from CS project powerpoint, boom)
I then went to Nevada mineral division site http://data-ndom.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/mining-claims, found exact spot of claim and looked at active/pending claims. We're on there as SR Minerals inc. We have 50 active claims in Esmerelda county. they look like the below
Claim Name Serial Number Dispostion Case Type Last Assmt Year Location Date Acreage
CROW 1 NMC1139179 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 10 NMC1139188 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 11 NMC1139189 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 12 NMC1139190 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 13 NMC1139191 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 14 NMC1139192 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 15 NMC1139193 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 16 NMC1140750 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 17 NMC1140751 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 18 NMC1140752 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 19 NMC1140753 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 2 NMC1139180 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 20 NMC1140754 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 21 NMC1140755 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 22 NMC1140756 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 23 NMC1140757 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 24 NMC1140758 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 25 NMC1140759 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 26 NMC1140760 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 27 NMC1140761 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 28 NMC1140762 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 29 NMC1140763 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 3 NMC1139181 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 30 NMC1140764 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 31 NMC1140765 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-02 20
CROW 32 NMC1140766 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 33 NMC1140767 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 34 NMC1140768 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 35 NMC1140769 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 36 NMC1140770 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 37 NMC1140771 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-03-03 20
CROW 38 NMC1146165 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-04-28 20
CROW 39 NMC1146166 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-04-28 20
CROW 4 NMC1139182 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 40 NMC1146167 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 41 NMC1146168 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 42 NMC1146169 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 43 NMC1146170 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 44 NMC1146171 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 45 NMC1146172 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 46 NMC1146173 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 47 NMC1146174 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 48 NMC1146175 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 49 NMC1146176 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2017-05-26 20
CROW 5 NMC1139183 ACTIVE PLACER 2018 2016-11-10 20
CROW 50 NMC1146177 A
Every reply makes you sound like even more of a massive twat lol. Is being called out on your crap trolling making you angry? Did you think you would create another sock puppet account and expect everyone to ask you questions about how big and clever you are? Well you're neither, just another sad little troll.
Abhorrent? Murder is abhorrent, being called a troll isn't. There's a big GAP between what you're purporting to be and what you actually are, which is a sad lonely troll. Maybe you should fill that GAP with something ;)
Which bluechips were you CEO of Willy? I assume you drove them into the ground as I don't know any that would post on here, mainly as they have fund managers etc. They also (even the dim ones) know how to spell and construct sentences. TLDR; you're a troll, go away
Since intheno's post we've had more drilling, PC stated wouldn't RNS anything about results unless were different from original samples, we've had nothing so can safely assume it's all of same commercial grades as previously. We wouldn't have had even a non binding MOU if this wasn't for realsies, plus as others have noted the permitting procedure could be sped up a fair bit with new process, so Q1 2019 may be conservative. It doesn't matter if there's a raise, it doesn't matter if we don't spike up on each RNS, it doesn't matter if permit takes original length of time, we have millions of tons of commercial grade mineral(s) that's simple to extract, interested buyers and a senior management team with a recent record of success with TYM - we will be substantially higher within 12 months - I keep trying to restrain myself on target price but soon there'll be new blood in here saying things like 'this is a steal under .9!' And you can get in now, for .16. This isn't ramping, this is SPAR....actually no it is a bit rampy, but read the last few RNS', read the posts below, do some maths, buy some SRES.
The 300m sq blocks encompassing the 5 drill-cores in the Main Zone provide some indication of the spatial distribution of source-rock in that area, with a radial thickening to 15.24m(W), 27.43m(N), 23.48m(E), 24.38m(S) from a presumed andesitic basement high over which the source-rock thins to 4.57m ( Core 17CSRC5). This results in tonnages of 4.2M & 3.8M for the 300m blocks encompassing 4 of the 5 cores, 0.56M & 2.28M as the source-rock thins westwards, and 5.4M to the south assuming the 24.38m thickness in core C2 continues for 300m in that direction and as the topography indicates. North from the Main Zone centre, the disclosure of basement in trench T1 suggests source-rock thinning in that direction. NE & E from the Main Zone centre however, trenching indicates a continuation of source-rock, of as yet unknown thickness, but for which I have adopted a conservative 5m thickness which results in a tonnage of 1.125M per block. With regard to the NE Zone, confirmation of source-rock continuity with the Main Zone, will increase the area substantially from the 0.42sq km cited by Beaufort. Absence of core data however, curtails any realistic assessment of source-rock tonnage. The topographic and inferred stratigraphic data suggests a reasonable probability of a significant source-rock thickness yet to be proven. In the meantime a conservative 5m average thickness of source-rock for the 0.42sq km, results in a total of 5.25Mt, whilst the c50m thickness implied in the A � A cross-section on the company website, if applied, would increase that ten-fold. We must await further information on that one. The Tuff Zone appears to encompass a structurally simple es****ment with a rhyolite cap-rock forming the SW boundary and limit of opencast mining. If the 61m of source-rock in core C8, grading down to 18m in C9, is continuous along strike, then it is a relatively simple series of calculations to arrive at a source-rock estimate of 40.98Mt for the zone. The recently announced (RNS 16.10.17.) NewPerl Prospect adds a further 4.712Mt of potential source-rock. I leave others to draw whatever conclusion they wish from these figures. At the very least this exercise suggests a substantial increase in source-rock tonnage from that suggested by Beaufort, sufficient to satisfy the volumetric requirements of a viable project. It is the further successful ongoing bulk sample tests and confirmation of marketability of the product, together with a targeted drilling programme, which will be necessary before any estimation of resource can even be considered. Even so many industrial mineral project companies do not proceed to, or release, resource figures, so it remains to be seen if Sunrise do so for this project.
Howdy, AIMbambi from Twitter here, this was posted by a user called intheno last November... The Beaufort Research Note of 10.07.2017 provides the only indication to date, of potential tonnage for the CS Project, referring on page 7 , to an anticipated pozzolan/perlite deposit of >20Mt (presumably tonne ie US metric ton). This tonnage was probably calculated using a notional average depth of 5m for the deposit over a total area of 1.58sq km (Main Zone 0.72sq km; NE Zone 0.42sq km and Tuff Zone 0.44sq km) and an average specific gravity (SG) of c2.5 for the in situ pozzolan/perlite source rock. The latter number of 2.5 SG. is mid-way in the range for rhyolite (ie 2.4-2.6) and is appropriate as an average for in-situ pozzolan (vitrified tephra/tuff) . The Kirkland Mining Co pozzolanic tuff, cited by others on this BB, has a SG of 2.2-2.3, probably reduced due to the 10% non-pozzolanic inclusions. The data (RNS 03.08.17) from 5 bore-hole cores in the Main Zone and 2 in the Tuff Zone, plus the company online maps and cross-sections, provides a basis, admittedly very limited, for reassessing the Beaufort estimate. The recent 16.10.17 RNS also adds that �the Main Zone remains open to the south, extends further north and east than previously defined and that the Main Zone and East Zone are part of a continuous sequence of adjacent and overlapping zones of pozzolanic perlite and tephra.� This latter statement implies the continuation of a significant thickness of potential source-rock from the Main Zone N and E into the NE Zone as indicated by the A � A cross-section. Using a 300m grid superimposed on a satellite image of the 3 zones, and the information outlined above, it is possible to estimate the potential source-rock tonnage for each 300m sq block to arrive at totals for the three zones, rounded down to the nearest million. It is important to note however that �source-rock� refers to the total pyroclastic sequence between andesite basement and rhyolite cap-rock. The pyroclastic sequence includes tuffs, tephra, pumiceous ashes, lahars and other lithologies of varying pozzolanic and perlitic quality. Only those portions of the sequence which satisfy all industry tests for use as pozzolan or perlite, which are extractable economically and for which there is a demonstrable market, can be classed as �resource�. The following totals are therefore estimations of potential �source-rock� not �resource�. Main Zone. 32 million tonnes. Northeast Zone. 5 million tonnes. Tuff Zone. 40 million tonnes. continued....