The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Mr Hackett,
Instead of being difficult a simple yes/no answer would suffice. It's not hard question to answer. I'm certainly not going to waste my time trawling through your ever increasing posting history.
My wife and I collectively own circa 500k shares. Nothing to hide if you're a genuine holder.
@EUAjaygee
Great work by yourself and Lovelyboy!!
Everyone, if you're genuinely invested, stop responding to the dross. You're wasting your time and providing them with the oxygen they crave. For the sake of this BB and other genuinely invested, filter and ignore. Its that simple. They'll soon go and bother some other BB when they cease to get attention here.
For those who missed @EUAjaygee's work....
New piece of work covering the whole West kytlim layout. Hope you enjoy.
Its 7 mins and yes the choppers back,and of course some anoying music to boot
Good luck to all.
https://twitter.com/EUAjaygee/status/1694994706269085805?s=20
For those of you who dont have twitter
https://youtu.be/xv9HxdyJj6c
El-Gelboy, you're 100% correct.
At this point, I'm just going to say that if you converse with these wasters you're practically just as bad as them. Just filter and allow the board to be free of these parasites. Rise above it!
Kammy,
All good points. But instead of bickering, why don't all genuine LTH make a concerted effort to simply filter and stop responding to the neg heads. They dont deserve a place on this BB which was proven by their responses to the AGM. Don't give them the oxygen they crave. It's really that simple. If you filter, they simply cease to exist.
Korriban, as per your original post in this thread, for the life of me, I can't understand why genuine holders haven't just filtered them. It makes for a much easier read of the BB. If posters continue to bicker and respond, they are just as guilty.
Del, one thing to be mindful of is the NATO meeting in Vilnius on the 11th and 12th July. The outcome of that is likely to have a baring on timescales regarding the "when".
This will be contentious but hoping there will be a realisation that peace agreements need to be prioritised over further escalation/involvement of NATO directly.
Del, I do take quite a bit of comfort that the DFS was approved. This to me says that the authorities are still happy to work with EUA even though the UK is classed as an unfriendly country.
It should be a case of when, not if, regarding a sale.
Del,
With regard to your questions:
1. Is the “buyer” who completed DD still at the table
Under paragraph "Possible sale of Russian Assets"
The Board remains of the view that any buyer is likely to be found in BRICS countries.
To me this reads that the original buyer is no longer at the table, otherwise they would have commented about that buyer still being interested?
4. Do we have a Japanese office?
Under section "Our investment case for potential buyers of our Russian assets"
- Environmental and Social Governance
Representative office in Japan to develop connections to Far East markets – Japan, China, Hong Kong SAR.
5. Rosgeo, is that gone now? previously they were exploring options.
Under Paragraph - Nyud Project and Rosgeo agreement
Eurasia retains a right to 75% of the Nyud exploration licence, which was applied for and later received by Rosgeo’s subsidiary OOO Monchegorskoye with an intention of establishing a joint venture with Eurasia’s 100% owned subsidiary, Yuksporskaya Mining Company, pursuant to the now expired two-year agreement between Rosgeo and Eurasia as announced 26 March 2021. The project is now being considered in the context of the Company’s proposed asset sale.
"Nyud project" is the only remaining part of the Rosgeo agreement being considered. It seems that all other parts have expired.
Offler, I have read the same figures regarding the UN resolution however from the following link, when you scroll down to the following subtitles it tells a the full story:
- Countries arming Ukraine
- Countries providing aid to Ukraine
- Countries sanctioning Russia
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/2/16/mapping-where-every-country-stands-on-the-russia-ukraine-war
Is there any coincidence between the amount financial and military aid the UK provides and the one sided narrative of our media?
Source of the charts within that article:
https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/
Folio, as it happens, I am invested in EUA, quite heavily hence my desire to follow the situation as closely as I can. I found the UK's media somewhat lacking in balance, hence my wider search.
I've likened it to listening to Mac for your EUA research (Mac, no offence intended). You're all happy to point out DYOR, yet you won't when it comes to the russia/Ukraine situation.
Folio, you'll have to point out what's sooo funny? I'm dim remember
Offler, the G7 makes up about 10% of the world's population, add Australia and a few others and approximately 20% vs 80% is about right give or take.
As someone mentioned earlier, if you want to dig hard enough, you can find a reason to discredit any source.
The point is, all we're being presented with is a completely 1 sided view, because that's what suits the agenda of our government.
A digital media investigator. Who's your employer?
Now, answer the questions.