RE: What really matters - short term v long term?13 Jan 2023 09:25
I think it also has another haircut coming. The last lender walked away when it found that government rules meant it couldn't create a charge over the mine in the event of non payment. It's how lenders work especially with large sums of money.
I can't believe any lender will make such a loan without such a charge.
The alternatives are persuade the government to change its stance and make ownership of the mine transferable, have a share issue or encourage a takeover of the company.
The first is by far the best choice but changing government policy isn't easy although you do have the lever of preventing job loses. The other two would not be good for shareholders.
This will probably get deleted for deramping but it's genuinely how I see it.