Member Info for TheFarEnd

"what else can you do but try to discredit the person writing such facts."

I'm content with my Lloyds investments chid and not trying to discredit you, you're entitled to your opinion. Talking of facts are you saying that chid and Newchuch are not the same person? No-one on here will believe you.

fleccy, you may be disillusioned atm, but you know deep down that socialism just doesn't work.

they may seem a viable alternative to you, with their constant 13/14 year rhetoric and carefully rehe****d soundbites. do you really believe that private schools and nom dom's are going to cut it?

there's only a few that can be trusted with these repeated platitudes. what happened to angela (scum) rayner, their once high profile deputy, she's been silenced, but only for now as starmer can't sack her.

they don't fool me, if they get near the reins of power, watch it all unfold and to our costs.

“as NC said at the time”

Always have a little chuckle when I see this in a post written by Chid. So many nom de plumes but she keeps remembering this one, it's popping up with a bit more regularity lately. 😊

Horses for courses.

“I’m out albeit with a bloody nose and down £1.5k”

Many, myself included, wouldn't paraphrase £1500 readies with “a bloody nose.”

But as I said, each to his own.

Just saying.

There's plenty here that give reason's not to invest in LBG but very few can offer up a viable alternative with the returns and security of investment that goes with it.

Most who knock it are wanna be traders who can't hack it when things turn.

This is one share you can literally buy and forget, the only caveat is your purchase price.

“My Dad put in a claim under '' My Diesel claim '' two years ago”

The likes of My Diesel claim and many others doing the rounds now, only got going after the two main solicitors one of which was Slater and Gordon, paid out a few years ago.

I received over £1700 for my troubles. Very informative every step of the way.

But of course the UK were miles behind the US, both in time and payment.

“Listening to our Foreign Secretary this morning”

I've no idea what he said to Laura Kuenssberg as I very seldom watch the BBC.

Probably the same message on other channels as he's been doing the rounds this morning.

After his disaster in Libya, thankfully this time around he's not the main man anymore.

“One million investors to be hit with dividend tax bills for first time”

Well that's something you'll never need to worry about Daft T. You have to be invested to receive dividends, and that's something that only exists in your daydreaming fantasies. 😂

BoA just reported fourth quarter net income down over 56% $7.1 billion down to $3.1 billion.

This could have been a DT post🤣 just saying.

May interest a few here.

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/ns-cut-premium-bonds-prize-111701934.html

Here's a political article that may have a bearing on LBG.

“BlackRock has warned that the upcoming General Election may lead to bond market turmoil as pre-election tax cuts and spending pledges from both parties are expected. The asset manager warned of the risk of the return of bond vigilantes (investors who sell bonds to protest inflationary policies) as parties attempt to win over voters. While Labour has been attacking the Tories over Truss “crashing the economy“, they might want to look in the mirror. Labour’s £28 billion a year black hole, which Starmer confirmed he would borrow in the second half of the next parliament.”

“The bond markets are clear: Labour cannot borrow to pay for their £28 billion-a-year unfunded spending commitment without risking a debt crisis”.

The Labour Party may have enjoyed the political benefits of the markets bucking Liz Truss out of her saddle. They should remember that those same bond market vigilantes trust socialists even less…

"Question is, what impact will this have on the UK economy and the lloyds share price...?"

STP

Exactly the same as you banging on about the EU all the time.

Dual standards! 😋

"Efforts to counter the orthodoxy of the OBR are growing. MPs and peers have written to the chancellor Jeremy Hunt on Sunday and have now published a report into the OBR’s wildly inaccurate forecasts. Their analysis has found:

The sum total of growth midjudgements in the OBR’s one-year budget forecasts is £558 billion between 2010 and 2023.

Since its formation in 2010 the OBR has misjudged UK public sector net borrowing by £53 billion every year. That’s equivalent to 10% of annual spending by all government departments.

When pandemic years are excluded, the OBR still misjudges UK net borrowing by £25 billion a year.

And Labour wants it to have the final say on economic policy."

I wonder what economic policy that is then? The only ones I've heard, are private school's, nom-doms and the constantly revised £28 billion for the environment/climate change.

The Trotsky.

You can spin things any way you want ‘Leon’ and you seem to have achieved it. Whether with the aid of chatgpt, unnecessary bluster or typical obfuscation as your handle on this forum suggests.

I briefly looked at your post yesterday after a session down the juicer and it's as clear now as it was then.

You can blame sunny Jim Callaghan during the 70’s, Norman Lamont, Maggie, the companies and the pension actuaries. However no amount of smoke and mirrors trying to spread the case for Gordon Brown's part in this can detract from the actual reported fact that the then chancellor, Gordon Brown, abolished substantial tax relief on dividends that pension funds received on their investments. And he will be forever blamed and responsible for implementing this legislation.

The resulting decimation of company pension schemes is there for all to see, or as is the case now, they're invisible.

Just thought I'd have my reply.

Labour just getting going.

‘Given that both parties say that they are focused on getting overall national debt down over the next Parliament, if you really want to do that, then you can't cut taxes and increase spending.

Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute of Fiscal Studies warned that it would be impossible to cut taxes while increasing spending without raising funds elsewhere

You can't cut taxes and keep spending anywhere near where it is.’

‘Increasing council tax on more expensive properties, clearly a case for reforming capital gains tax to get more money from that. They could close inheritance tax loopholes. They could decide they're going to reduce tax relief on pensions.'

Meanwhile, some savers are racing to cash in their pensions amid fears Labour could reimpose punishing taxes on retirement pots.

This is just the start, you have been warned.

Ps. I wouldn't pay too much attention to Gazzleberry if I were you. He backed Sturgeon 100%, best thing since sliced bread, all other political parties are rubbish. Funny how he doesn't mention them at all now. You get the measure of the bloke.

He'll get this post removed lol.

RR78.

Don't think moving to a SIPP will protect you, nothing will be safe under labour.

First to go will be the 25% tax free lump sum. They just can't stand the working man coming into some money even if it is your own.

Remember Brown's disastrous move to taxing dividends, finished the private company pension schemes at a stroke.

They're gonna tell you no new taxes, and the moronic left will believe them.

Re: RKH

Admit it, you miss him really Hardup. 🙂

Give it a rest DT. Someone sold 4.3 million shares and this indicates an inherent weakness.

With over 63 BILLION issued, that kinda makes you the most gullible or the most stupid poster on here.

I know which one I'd choose.

You need to get out more.

Yer waste bins go out more than you.

Re: Chid

Hate to disappoint Tricky, but these so-called ramblings have no input from AI, in fact the AI bots probably get their info trawling Chid's many posts and aliases. 😂

I have to say I agree with some of what she says, but I'm quite selective.

Chips.

If you're not selling your

LBG shares below 100p and your Gold below $3k. I hope you're young enough to realise your dream.

The chances of these supposedly two conflicting events happening simultaneously is probably beyond most people's time span.