Member Info for TheFarEnd

Heading up again 76.01if you'll interested.

Well yesterday's posts were a bit more constrained not too much about Brexit which in my book that's how it should be. When one topic dominates it can neglect the underlying purpose being about Lloyds banking group. So yesterday we had ISA's, Trump, BOE, Iran and Israel, a bit of filtering, usual rubbish from you know who and some posts about the SP. Also refreshing to see RobGTR post his trades as and when they happen, there used to be a lot of that on here. Blimey all this chat you've converted DCB, turmeric what ever next.......don't tell me Brexit!!!!

Hosts and slugs like moisture, I expect you get a lot of that 'up there' well that my impression living a bit further south. I see someone are utilising used coffee grounds to make brickets, apparently they burn quite well with no coffee smell.

No we don't live in Italy but you don't get do you, right now we live in the European Union and we're getting out, hopefully just in time before the ship sinks.

At last, I don't believe this will reverse trend now we've gone ex dividend. We'll see what next Monday brings. GLA.

Property prices on the wane, biggest monthly drop in 8 years. Halifax Index shows a 3.1% decline in April. The less volatile 3 month figure also in decline. The answer from almost every politician is build more houses. My answer reduce the population.

I see Clydesdale have made an offer for Virgin Money, challenger banks are fighting back.

jayfax Norway is not fully in the single market only by association with being in the EEA. The EEA agreement grants Norway access to the EU's single market. From the 23,000 EU laws currently in force, the EEA has incorporated around 5,000 (in force) meaning that Norway is subject to roughly 21% of EU laws. I'm sure you know it is not in the customs union either. Interesting article in the Times today about Britain facing restrictions on post-Brexit trade and draconian measures to enforce free-market policies because the European Union fears a future Jeremy Corbyn government. Senior European officials have told The Times that concerns over Labour�s economic policies are the main reason for the EU�s insistence on a tough �level playing field mechanism� in a future deal after Britain leaves. In short, they are getting worried that the UK will become more competitive, actually too competitive, this is not just about changes to lower social and environmental changes but also potential state subsidies. Another reason they are desperate to control us and another reason to actually LEAVE.

Jayfax I must take issue with your statement last night - Remainers are very decisive, very clear what is best to do, and are able to explain why clearly. Now you know that is not true. Yes remainers would like the status quo and remain but of course they cannot say this (I'm talking politicians etc now) as we have had the referendum. They usually start off with the bulk standard statement we're leaving the EU we respect the result BUT. This is where they are not so decisive, you know the rest, each has his own agenda how to proceed clarity, no chaos.

Whilst this latest news from Finland is undoubtedly progress, talk of Beowulf at this time having potentially two sustainable developments is somewhat premature. BEM is Kallak that is what the market cap is based on, if the concession is rejected you'll see how much valuation the market puts on its other activities.

Well who'd have thought it, that ABBA would be making a comeback before Beowulf gets their licence. They're all in their 70's now, well I've heard it takes a lifetime to make decisions in Sweden. Remember they were once Sweden's biggest export.

I see the Swedish unemployment rate nudge up to 6.5% this morning. I can think of a way to reverse this trend.

I guess that's an honest answer.

Are you actually invested here WorldGoRound?

I did say I'm not sure I agree with your statement tintin, and I'm still not sure, but on we go...........waiting that is.

An independent review is advisory only it wouldn't have the authority to grant the concession. The government would still be in control, they always are aug59.

Not sure I agree with your statement tintin, (an appeal to the court which, ironically will make a decision quicker than the Government). Governments can and sometimes do use the courts as a get out clause. The general consensus on here is that everything in the process has run its course and the Government has to make a decision. Has anyone thought that because this is such a contentious issue and with one government agency against a mine, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that the government can order an independent review of the Kallak case. In doing so they will at this stage absolved themselves of any decision until well after the upcoming autumn election, just a thought. Politics is a bit like investing there's so many twists and turns its usually the unexpected that turns up.

The natives are getting restless, meanwhile as we wait the decline continues. Since the companies final submissions on the 5th March, the SP on the AktieTorget market was 0.90, alas today it's 0.791 a fall of 12% in 28 trading days. If this trend continues there will be no need for a Bed and ISA just sell and wait a bit and you'll end up with your costs covered and more shares.

Well you've got an RNS to concur with that Mr mwilliams41.

Tintin, if mining and mining can't get on together or talk then we're in trouble!!!