Todays Article...8 Dec 2021 21:51
There's no doubt Brailey and Winnifrith are working together in an attempt to trash the company and it's board. The article by Brailey is shameful and certainly not professional by any standard of journalism.
These are people who delve into people's lives and their companies, getting information by dubious means and quite obviously don't like it 'up em'.
Shareholders wanted David Bramhill to instigate an investigation into how these leaks came about and anyone suspected of being involved in it was open to scrutiny. Winnifrith and Brailey are high on the suspect list, Winnifrith releasing details of a market sounding and Brailey potentially using the bulletin boards to back him up.
In all honesty, I cannot understand why they are so shocked at themselves being looked at, Winnifrith for one has cost shareholders dearly and continues to hammer the company, stating it is the 'most toxic company on AIM'. My question to that is "who caused this initially and who is continuing to make it toxic"? The answer is the two people named earlier. How can a company that is producing a decent quantity of oil and generating in the region of $500,000 cash monthly be toxic? Few companies on AIM are as well funded, debt free and generating this level of cash.
Winnifrith and Brailey should be ashamed of their actions, however, they make their wages from producing rubbish like the article today, wouldn't want the kiddies starving.
Interestingly, it would appear few people agree with their viewpoint so it will be beans on toast for a while!