RE: Interim results19 May 2026 21:51
Why a Fundraise at 0.08p is Unlikely (The Reality vs The Fear)
There is a lot of noise about the interim cash figure, but looking closely at the order book and the balance sheet, a traditional dilutive fundraise at these levels is effectively off the table for four reasons:
The Dilution Trap: With 6.33bn shares in issue, raising even 1.2m pounds at a discounted 0.06p to 0.07p requires printing 2 billion new shares. This triggers a massive 30% plus dilution just to cover basic admin, breaking the equity structure.
Institutional Mutiny: The legacy founders (Edwards family) and the broker (Oak Securities) control a combined 23% of the voting shares from much higher entry points like the 0.22p placement. They will block any cheap down-round that wipes out their positions.
The Warrant Floor: Corporate advisors hold warrants at 0.25p, and directors hold roughly 240m warrants each at 0.2p. Printing billions of cheap shares sub-0.1p leaves these incentive packages completely worthless. Management will protect these strike prices.
The ATM Restraint: Oak holds 575m pre-issued treasury shares via the At-The-Market facility. Dumping those into an illiquid 0.08p book completely tanks the bid and destroys the value of Oak's own 13% core equity block. It is a tool of pure desperation, not strategy.
The Cash Burn Illusion: Why It is Only Around 38k a Month
Panicking over the 1.2m pounds admin line is an optical illusion. It is heavily weighed down by back-heavy, one-off historical legacy payments and professional fees from the previous management hand-off.
The actual operational cash leaving the bank account over the last 8.5 months tells a different story:
Sept 1, 2025 (Opening Cash): 2,312,282 pounds
May 18, 2026 (Current Cash): 125,000 pounds
Total Cash Handled: 2,187,282 pounds
However, 1,860,000 pounds of that was a one-off capital allocation to buy their core TAO token treasury holdings.
Stripping out that crypto investment leaves pure operational spending:
2,187,282 pounds (Total Spent) minus 1,860,000 pounds (TAO Purchase) equals 327,282 pounds Operational Cash Used.
Dividing 327,282 pounds across the 8.5 months since September reveals a true operational cash burn rate of just 38,500 pounds per month.
Takeaway: Cash-Flow Positivity Will Remove the Fear
At 38.5k a month, the 125k cash pot provides 3 months of runway. The legacy bills are now cleared, and the underlying business is actually cash-flow positive. The core network generated 516,235 pounds in six months, a run-rate of over 1m pounds a year against a cash burn under 500k a year.
Markets love cash-flow positive businesses. To permanently erase the fear of dilution, the board just needs to exchange a small fraction of that liquid TAO yield for Sterling to top up the bank balance. The second the market sees a rising Sterling cash balance funded by their own AI infrastructure rather than shareholder pockets, the fear evaporates and a major re-ratin