Member Info for TerryM1

Not sure why an Iran deal makes this much difference, HH not changed much since Iran war so not really effect DEC. Also EQT down but not nearly as much so Iran deal may be part of the reason but not the whole.

Not sure why volumes too low for pump and dump just have to enough to move the SP up and then down which has just happened.

Perhaps on first sign of weakness a lot of people moved out happy with short term profits and those holding for a long time happy to get out with lower losses or some profit, many people burned by this share and not wanting deja vu.

The 2 things it may be is a a new deal or a pump and dump, not sure what is worse.

I meant that Ameriprise Financial, Inc are just over 5% i.e. they are 5.056%, should have more clear in my wording.

Add to this

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/DEC/diversified-energy-tr-1/17526762

Barclays at 3.41%.

Just gone over 5%.

ConservativeYank

Thanks for your advice but if you don't mind I will make up my own investment decisions.

Of course I know it was speculative and if I lose money that is all part of the game but what I hate is directors asking for money knowing it is no where near enough for the needs of the company without informing investors these are just a stop gaps, they obviously do this as they can't get the full amount in one go but are afraid if they told the truth on the amount required or need for more raises they would not get any money, IMO just a lie, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. You can say they did not know then the question is are they competent, perhaps things do not go as planned and a new finance is needed before production but for this company it has happened many times and is likely to happen more times so for me the motives, trust and/or competence of the directors is in question. In fact this is the 4th time I have been involved with these multiple fund raises, so far one company in liquidation, one at 98% down, one 60% down and this one. All with the same story.

ConservativeYank

It should not be the nature of investing that the BOD asked for money in a fund raise with misleading comments/info, then go on to spend all of the cash and come back multiple times with more or less the same story dropping the SP and diluting shareholders every time. As I say I am not putting one more penny into this company paying for the BOD salary unless there are tangible profits in sight, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

For the record I only put less than 0.5% of my total investments and less than 0.2% of total assets but I really object to the BOD making misleading statements in order to get me to fund the company until the next fund raise and then another and looks like another. They should be honest and state approx. how much money they need to take this to market, if they don't know they should not be in the business asking for money, at the very least they should state that or not asked for peoples hard earned money with fairy stories to pay fore they lifestyle. This is a listed company not a university research department, it purpose to make money for the shareholders.

I have lost 82% of my capital so far without any explanation or apology from the BOD, they just keep asking for more. Is there is surprise that the great innovative ideas are not funded in the UK, ask yourself why, this is just one of a number of companies playing this game. I have been involved in 3 all have the same story, that's it for me.

Katstrangler

"It's a cliche to call a company 'a lifestyle choice' just because you didn't get 100% return in a year."

No, not 100% in a year, just a loss of 82% in since 2024 when I bought in at £1.40 with BOD saying how good the future would be, then SP just keeps dropping, placing after placing giving huge share dilution, no profits to show and no sign of profits, the only ones who are benefiting are the BOD, if if looks like a "lifestyle choice", if it performs like a "lifestyle choice" it is a ?

"upcoming inevitable fund raise"

I will not add one more penny to this company until I can see there are likely to be profits or a significant breakthrough leading to profits, after all that is what investors want not a money eating machine on jam tomorrow promises.

These are my comments from a year or more ago

“IMO I was mislead by the comments/info from the BOD on the fund raise (one and only one I took part in) in order to get me and others to invest, IMO nearly all of the drop in the SP is down to fact that the BOD/company have not delivered and not the market.”

“This company is still no more than a life style choice for the BOD and seems to me will be a time before any profits.”

“I bought in a time ago and will feel extremely lucky now to get out without a loss,”

“Unfortunately this company has been good at 2 things since it started. Raising money only to use it all up and then need raise some more while SP just keeps dropping, giving a life style choice for directors paid for by disappointed share holders.”

War or no war I do not see any significant changes since I made these comments and investment, I would love to be proved wrong and at the very least cut my losses, I live in hope as that seems to be the only thing we have.

This company seems to be no different to some other AIM companies I invested in which looked like they had great products and no doubt the BODs are technically brilliant but like this one it just runs off more fund raises, share dilution with no profits in sight, SPs keep dropping and the BODs have a great life style doing what they enjoy being well paid at the shareholders expense. I work on the premises if just one of these companies comes good I will be well into profit, so far the one taken over at just over my entry price and another doing very well but nowhere near good enough to cover my losses on the others, however the company doing well is not researching/developing products but implementing and enhancing an already successful product. I may miss out on a great opportunity in the future but I will stay away from these companies, lost too much money.

Jim800

Wow.

I have been considering what has happen to the SP for a little while now and as I said something has changed as can be seen from the large SP rise, huge volumes and IIs that are accumulating and they know more about what is going on than us PIs.

Comparing against EQT it’s closest peer (which has significantly outperformed DEC in the long term) something changed on 17 Mar which has seen DEC go up 20% more than EQT. They may be other factors at play with EQT but I doubt it as it has risen around 5% in that period, also comparing DEC to other similar companies (but not as close a EQT) the trend is the same but % gain is around 13% more for DEC.

Therefore I conclude DEC is an outlier on volume and SP performance since 17 Mar but of course the question is why or more to the point the probably explanation so excluding HH, HH forwards, Global situation which is the same for all of these companies and explain the SP rises but not the extra rise for DEC.

The factors only applicable to DEC I can see are

The good accounts reported but IMO they are not good enough to explain the rise as the other companies will also benefit from the large rise in HH last year. Also the rise would have occurred around the time the accounts were released.

EIG have no shares now so no dumping from them to put off new/increased positions.

Momentum trading (may account for some gain).

Shorts closing (may account for some gain).

Something else

IMO Something else is the most likely cause, therefore what can it be and the only obvious thing I can think of is a takeover of course the other factors may be responsible or the something else, an unknown unknown, except a takeover only other things I can think of are a large find or a large sale of unwanted acreage. Who knows, but here we are.

Https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/ADIG/replace-apportionment-ratio-feb-2026-b-shares/17523951

In calculating Capital Gain/Loss

Relevant value (pence per share)

Ordinary 13.4p

B Share 14.5p

Relevant ratio

Ordinary 48.03%

B Shares 51.97%

TrekMadone

Well done, as I say this is a great trading share but for me no good for investing, I may stay for bit longer until I start trading out, for me it is the large volumes that make me think something is a foot but in the past I made a lot of my trading profits not getting too greedy and then jumping back in again with the same money when it went down.

GG like some others cannot detach from their emotions when investing, I guess we are all guilty of that but I have leant to try and keep as emotionally detached from my investing/trading decisions as possible even if I really dislike what a company/president/PM is doing I am here to make money.

Thanks for the ENRG tip, nicely in profit.

Good luck with your other opportunities, should be a lot around after the recent large drops.

WillLackster

I am not sure a ceasefire will cause a large drop as the HH prices if anything has gone down while the war has been going on, there will be have been some gain from the non hedged oil output which is only a small part of the production. Also it has been predicted the O&G price will not go back down to the old levels for some time after the war because of the infrastructure destroyed and a lot of reserves will need replenishing. Also as time goes on more LNG export capacity will come on stream pushing up the proportion of gas exported.

Also comparing DEC SP against EQT it's closest peer DEC has gone up a lot more since 17 Mar which makes me believe a lot of the recent rise is specific to DEC and the huge volumes also point to this. This is why I have been holding on before I start selling my latest trades and more, I could be wrong, we shall see.

Be interesting to know where these companies got the stock, was it from the secondary issue or in the market, I suspect mostly from the secondary issue but a good sign none the less.

VistaMan

I believe anything below 0.5% is not reported which it why it shows as 0% but I may be wrong.

MrBeaky

It may be due to large number of shares being cancelled so the % of the short went up over 0.5% which triggered the reporting while the short position stayed the same.

MrG123

Nobody goes hungry taking a profit, may well turn out to be a good move, don't think GG should be taken seriously the IIs invested in DEC will have much more info and access to experts to interpret it. However in the long term AROs could well be a serious issue.

I am staying as emotionally detached as I can (which is a lot) trying to understand/guess what is going on, the thing for me is the very high volumes but what is going on.

Maybe the last accounts which were good but not that impressive and the rise did not start to well after release of the accounts.

Does not seem to be HH price but perhaps some optimism on the state of the world gas market as more LPG terminal come on stream.

The start of this rise was just after EIG sold all their shares so perhaps a number of buyers were holding back fearing a share dump but once over piled in.

There is probably some momentum trading.

IMO there is either a rerate (as SP is historically so low) with a some investors building new/larger positions, large volumes are because profit taking and investors stuck not wanting to take a loss using this opportunity to get out.

or

Perhaps, just perhaps a takeover, not a prediction or advice but a possibility.

I am holding while it keeps rising and will reassess if it starts to fall. As you say there is always the danger of another deal with SP destruction, at least for now I am just risking profits.

Https://www.investors.com/news/dividend-stock-liquified-natural-gas-diversified-energy-oil-prices-iran-hormuz/?src=A00220

Jim800

Thought you would be right back, if not me who else are you referring to, have some courage and give us a name to prove it is not me but of course you won't.

As I have said I have absolutely no interest in anything you say, not obsessed just ignore you as it is just rubbish but as I have told you many times stay away from me and will stay away from you as it is so boring but I will respond when you have a dig me. Why can't you just leave it alone but you can't and won't.

I have made a lot more elsewhere, posted some of shares here I have been invested in so people can look into them and make up their own minds and now doing OK with DEC because of trading not the hold and hope strategy you love so much.

Jim800

"Mr negative will repeat his down 50% over 5 years mantra (it’s actually 42%) "

This is not doubt aimed at me, as I said you are so obsessed you can't give up,

No I will not repeat it is down 50% if it is down 42%, when I said 55% it was was 55% when I said 50% it was 50%, Still for you being down 42% is a win, so in 5 years now down 47% while EQT it's closest peer up 242% looks more negative than positive to me.

Anyway into small but respectable profit because of lots of trading.

Over to you, I know you are busting to take another dig.

The Company's 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders ("Annual Meeting") will be a virtual meeting held at 8:00 a.m. EDT on May 6, 2026. Details on how to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting can be found in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

The Company has elected to utilize the SEC rules that allow us to provide shareholders access to our proxy materials over the internet. Beginning on March 24, 2026, we mailed to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice of Internet Availability") containing instructions regarding how to access the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement online. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions regarding how shareholders can elect to receive these proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email.

Copies of the Notice of Internet Availability and Proxy Statement have been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism.

For further information, please contact:

Diversified Energy Company +1 973 856 2757

Doug Kris dkris@dgoc.com

www.div.energy