RE: Why..27 Jan 2024 09:56
In response and reply to Fulmar (aka Ruffles / ARCM BOD / Ramping gang for the sake of balance:-
@Teaye-Whilst I agree with the sentiment of your post we are on a slippery slope when we allow a deliberately destructive minority to dictate to the majority . The agenda of the "ramping gang" is obvious, and although I will not engage directly, it will not stop me posting information or conversing with anyone I want to. The moderators for LSE are shoddy even to the point of some suggesting they may have ulterior motives, but it seems to be a modern phenomenon where manic minorities are allowed to be noisily active and dominant They continually make soppy allegations and for the purpose of clarity I have one name on LSE and one on Twitter (couldn't be bothered to do otherwise). I have now sold all my shares for reasons previously pointed out. I personally believe that plenty of naïve investors are taken in by the false hope posts and spam that the Ramping gang headed by the above named illiterate group of retreads.
I am not alone in thinking that Fulmar, NvS and KEvB , Ruffles etc (to name but a few) are if not one and the same, are 100% in cahoots.
The IC on Thu was confirmation to why I and many others think this is not all that is made out by the Ramping Gang, and a bunch of bitter "retreads" will hopefully have no effect or influence on those who think that ARCM is a cert, which of course, no company, especially a small mining company on AIM is.
Perhaps the real solution is for all who abhor the actions and posts of Fulmar and his crew to all report their "destructive" posts.Or as you say Teaye avoid the site-not my style, but each to their own !