Member Info for swazers

@moab, again, what are your specific arguments? You do not have any except personal attacks.

@testpack3 Bob & me getting more positive votes than you has seriously triggered you, hasn't it? You are livid right now. Dont you think you need to relax more? You strike me as a proper stress head. Take a chill pill, mucker. It's only a game show. None of this is real :)

@Patxaran, I have been awaiting any real counterarguments from you for years, yet none ever come, only personal insults. Amazing! Your entire premise is built upon nothing. Keep up the stellar work, old man.

@Moab Do you actually have any talking points? Or is it only personal attacks? Is that it? Just insults?

While certain parties try to muddy the waters, here’s a fact that sharp investors should be watching closely:

👉 UHL (United H2 Ltd) has just announced its GreenH2 Global platform is expanding into India — one of the world’s most ambitious and fastest-growing hydrogen markets.

✅ India is targeting 5 million metric tonnes of green hydrogen by 2030.

✅ $3.6 billion+ budget in place to back it.

✅ UHL is already proven in LATAM, Africa, Europe — now scaling into Asia.

So what does this mean for PHE?

👉 PHE’s DMG technology remains a key part of National H2’s global licensing stack under UHL.

👉 Modular waste-to-hydrogen solutions like DMG are perfectly suited to emerging markets like India, where:

Grid stability is mixed. Waste management is a priority. Distributed hydrogen is needed near hard-to-abate sectors.

Bottom line: Every time UHL expands the GreenH2 Global footprint, the underlying strategic value of DMG — and PHE’s licensing potential increases.

India’s market is enormous.

The waste-to-hydrogen angle is very attractive to Indian policymakers because it solves two problems at once:

♻️ Reduces plastic & mixed waste.⚡ Generates clean energy locally.

And the trolls won’t tell you this: 👉 UHL’s expansion is not about hypothetical "big plant" hydrogen only — it is about creating a network of scalable, deployable technologies. DMG is uniquely positioned to deliver in that framework.

📈 The market may not have woken up to this yet, but the institutions watching UHL’s moves certainly have.

📈 As this platform scales, PHE will be a core IP beneficiary. Ignore the noise. Follow the strategy. Watch the platform build.

GLA 🚀Swazers :)

@H2hooo

Keep up the excellent work my friend & screw the trolls. It's obvious that @Testpack3 fears you and always has done. Whoever resides behind the persona is a coward and an idiot. You have the support of literally 100s of real people. More than he could imagine. Not paid shills but actual investors.

@Testpack3 📢 RE: Valuation Mechanics, Modular Models, and Misleading “Gotchas” Let’s walk through the spin — and reset the narrative with facts:

🔹 1. “AUD $40M” vs “AUD $80M”

There’s a glaring inconsistency right out of the gate. You cite a “simple gotcha” around AUD $40M, yet ignore the broader IPO valuation range of up to AUD $80M as per recent communications. That valuation, based on forward projections and strategic IP holdings, includes tech like DMG through National H2, which is already part of UHL’s stack. Forecast-based valuations using KPI-linked discounting models are standard in cleantech and biotech. That’s not fraud — that’s how pre-revenue industrial technology is assessed globally.

🔹 2. PHE ≠ OEM = You Still Don’t Get It

Your repeated attempt to frame PHE as an old-school OEM manufacturer is categorically wrong. PHE does not operate CapEx-heavy infrastructure — it licenses tech. This is akin to ARM in semiconductors or Vestas licensing offshore blade designs.

In today’s energy transition economy, modularity and licensing are the accelerators of scale. You either don’t understand how licensing platforms monetise in energy tech, or you're intentionally misrepresenting it to confuse readers. Either way, that line of attack holds no water.

🔹 3. Personal Attacks Reveal Weakness, Not Strength

You conclude with vitriol aimed at respected board contributors, throwing names and accusations like a disturbed individual. That’s not analysis — it’s deflection. When facts fall short, some reach for character assassination. This isn’t a popularity contest — it’s about recognising that PHE’s DMG is now licensed globally via National H2. It forms part of a multi-entity rollout under UHL/GreenH2 Global, and that model has historical success (LATAM) and IPO positioning in flight.

🔹 4. Final Thought

If your position is so solid, @Testpack3, why lean so heavily on aggression and misdirection? Let the facts speak. And the facts say: a modular licensing platform embedded in a multi-continent hydrogen infrastructure play is fundamentally mispriced at

RE: Modularity, Syngas, and the Role of DMG in the Transition

Let’s clear the fog on this. @Testpack3 continues to mischaracterise modularity as a flaw, when in fact it is the core advantage in PHE’s model. DMG was never designed to compete with 30ktpa mega-green hydrogen plants powered by electrolysers or nuclear — it was built to service a completely different, underserved segment of the hydrogen economy:

♻️ Waste-to-energy conversion from non-recyclable plastics.

🏭 Localised deployment where grid power or clean H₂ is constrained.

⚡ Distributed energy systems using syngas as a clean substitute for diesel or grid dependency.

This isn’t “Giga-scale or bust” — it’s about energy symmetry, localisation, and revenue from licensing in sectors traditional green H2 players can’t reach.

🔍 Fact-checking the claims:

1️⃣ DMG units are modular by design, which means they can be scaled vertically or horizontally, not limited to a 20- 40tpd footprint.

2️⃣ The comparison to 30ktpa electrolysis plants is a false equivalence. That’s a different CAPEX, infrastructure, and application tier entirely.

3️⃣ Syngas is already used in gas turbines, gas engines, and hydrogen reformers, and PHE’s system removes tar, improves purity, and preserves char by-product for further monetisation (biochar, carbon credits, etc.).

4️⃣ UHL, via National H2, has licensed DMG tech to integrate precisely into smaller-scale, flexible deployment scenarios, which large-scale hydrogen doesn’t touch.

📣 Engsolve Divestment. Even the aside about Engsolve being spun off as an IPO, which is credible, only strengthens the case for lean core operations at PHE and validates that the tech arm is gaining a standalone commercial interest.

💡 In short: The market doesn’t need PHE to power the world. It needs PHE to monetise what the world throws away — and convert that liability into decentralised energy. Modularity isn’t a weakness. It’s the Trojan horse for local, scalable energy transformation — and that’s exactly where the demand curve is headed.

@jancux01 RE: Licensing, Scale, and Strategic Positioning

1️⃣ Licensing Revenue Doesn’t Appear Overnight

Yes — PHE isn’t yet flooding in licensing cash, but that’s not the point of the model at this stage. You’re ignoring that National H2 holds exclusive rights to deploy DMG in Australia and Europe, and they are a direct portfolio company of UHL, which is pre-IPO and actively scaling through GreenH2 Global. That is precisely how a modular, asset-light platform scales: through tech licensing into global ecosystems, not via overnight manufacturing royalties.

2️⃣ Bridgend and Protos ≠ Cherry-picking

The £1M Bridgend unit isn’t being “cherry-picked” — it’s a modernised demonstrator with rapid commissioning protocols, unlike Protos, which was a first-generation concept stifled by outdated JV dynamics and design scope. If you’re going to compare historical projects, be honest about the contextual evolution of the technology and ownership structure.

3️⃣ UHL IPO Valuation Matters

The UHL pre-IPO valuation of AUD $80M is material because it reflects the value the market assigns to a portfolio of solutions, one of which is PHE’s DMG system via National H2. Dismissing that because it’s “pre-revenue” is naive. That’s how clean tech funding works. PHE is not claiming £540M MCAP — but the licensing potential to support that one day is grounded in venture precedent.

4️⃣ EBITDA Doesn’t Come Before Execution

Quoting EBITDA in a pre-deployment phase as a requirement for “legitimacy” shows either a misunderstanding of how infrastructure tech companies evolve or deliberate FUD. Licensing EBITDA follows deployment — it doesn’t precede it.

💡 You want proof? Watch UHL’s IPO filings. Watch NH2’s rollout. The tech has transitioned from testbed to deployment-readiness. That’s a fact — and markets recognise it. The lag in PHE’s share price reflects delayed visibility, not technical failure.

GLA indeed — but open both eyes to facts, not just convenient scepticism. Swazers.

Fellow investors, here’s something that many seem to be overlooking — but it could be the key to understanding Powerhouse Energy’s (PHE) future value. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/greenh2latam_greenhydrogen-nationalh2-energaedalimpia-activity-7323101694056161282-JQbm?utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAAECYDiEBs8o3Ja_oRAM7z2wzOi7ZjG5lags&utm_source=social_share_send&utm_campaign=copy_link

https://greenh2europe.com/#subsidiaries

🔍 GreenH2 Europe is the newly launched European expansion platform of United H2 Limited (UHL) — a clean energy investment group. UHL has quietly been assembling a global hydrogen infrastructure engine through its GreenH2 Global network, with arms in LATAM, Africa, and now Europe.

👉 Why does this matter to us as PHE holders?

Because UHL owns National H2, the exclusive license holder of PHE’s DMG technology for both Australia and Europe.

Let's connect the dots.

✅ GreenH2 Europe is UHL’s European operational front.

✅ UHL and National H2 have explicitly stated that their tech stack includes waste-to-energy from plastic (DMG’s core function).

✅ GreenH2’s official site mentions plastic-to-energy systems — that’s DMG territory.

✅ UHL is preparing for a pre-IPO/IPO cycle, and showcasing their tech pipeline is critical.

✅ PHE is already embedded into that pipeline, but the market hasn’t priced it in.

Our tech is sitting quietly at the foundation of a hydrogen rollout machine spanning 3 continents, backed by capital partners and deploying scalable, modular energy systems like DMG.

💡 What’s next? Expect UHL/NH2 to make commercial deployment moves. When that happens, PHE could see a strategic re-rating, particularly if licensing revenues, JVs, or SAF-aligned syngas partnerships are confirmed.

🧠 This isn’t hope — it’s strategic value. Just follow the chain:

PHE → National H2 → UHL → GreenH2 Global → EU deployment.

Sometimes, the market misses the quietest pieces of the puzzle — until it doesn’t.

🟢 Stay sharp, stay long. The DMG tech is real. And the platform being built around it is global.

In a recent post, @Testpack3 stated:

“For a 12p share price, the Market Cap would be 4.5B x 12p = £540M. PHE would have to make £36M EBITDA per year… so we need 36 DMG units if each makes £10M turnover. Therefore, it’ll take 15 years for the company to grow into that valuation.”

This sounds impressive, but it's an absolute analytical fallacy, built on outdated assumptions, misapplied valuation metrics, and a deliberate attempt to confuse retail holders. Here’s why this is total rubbish:

🔻 1. PHE Is Not a Legacy OEM — It’s a Modular Licensing Platform.

Testpack3 tries to model PHE like an old-school manufacturer that must build, fund, and operate all its own infrastructure. That’s simply wrong.

✅ PHE earns through licensing, royalties, joint ventures, and Engsolve engineering contracts.

✅ The business is designed to scale modularly, with external project financing via EPCs and partners like NH2.

📌 So his backwards logic — “we need £36M EBITDA from 36 units” — is pure speculation, not grounded in PHE’s actual operating model.

🔻 2. Outdated Cost Assumptions Are a Red Herring.

“The stated cost of the ‘test’ unit at Bridgend was £1M. The Protos Park 20t/day unit was £10M…”

Testpack3 uses the Protos Park failure as a benchmark, even though It was on a different scale and phase. It’s not reflective of PHE’s current FTU design or cost structure. The Bridgend unit was successfully delivered for ~£1M — with no Protos-style issues. This cherry-picking of legacy costs is designed to inflate fear and deflate confidence.

🔻 3. Peer Valuation Shows 12p Is Entirely Achievable

Let’s use real market comparables, not fantasy maths. United H2 Limited (UHL) is set to IPO at a valuation of $(AUD) 80 M+, before any unit deployment.

PHE already has operational validation (FTU), revenue (Engsolve), and licensing-ready IP. Yet PHE trades at ~£30M MCap.

🔻 4. This Isn’t Education — It’s Obfuscation

Testpack3 says: “Hope this helps the ‘newbie’ to PHE and accounts.”

But what it really does is: Present an oversimplified model to seed doubt. Mislead new investors with antiquated numbers. Distract from the real catalysts building beneath the surface, like the UHL/NH2 IPO, FTU success, Avioxx SAF validation, and macro policy momentum.

📌 To newer holders: Don’t be intimidated by financial jargon dressed up as objectivity. When someone quotes “EBITDA” and “P/E” without understanding PHE’s modular and licensing-led model, they’re not educating — they’re manipulating. 🧠 PHE is executing. The market just hasn’t caught up yet. When it does, it won’t ask permission.GLA ✊

Let’s connect the dots. https://www.avioxx.co.uk/avioxx-and-solydera-achieve-breakthrough-in-waste-to-power-for-sustainable-aviation-fuel-production.html

The recent news from Avioxx and Solydera marks a significant milestone in the waste-to-power landscape. Their breakthrough in converting waste into Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is exactly the kind of independent, third-party validation that affirms what companies like Powerhouse Energy (PHE) have been building toward for years.

Here’s why it matters:

🔹 PHE's DMG Technology Creates Ultra-Pure Syngas

SAF production from waste starts with reliable, clean syngas — something PHE’s rotary kiln-based DMG system is purpose-built to produce. It avoids the tar issues plaguing traditional systems and is modular, scalable, and now proven through hot commissioning.

🔹 The Ecosystem Is Coming Together

PHE isn’t just a standalone tech provider anymore — it's part of a rapidly evolving supply chain. With Engsolve commercial, NH2 heading toward IPO, and now Avioxx unlocking downstream use cases for syngas, we’re seeing the value of PHE’s role in this green hydrogen and SAF ecosystem validated from multiple angles.

🔹 Massive Demand for SAF Incoming

The UK, EU, and global aviation sectors are under immense pressure to decarbonise. Governments are actively pushing SAF mandates, and feedstock producers, like PHE, will play a critical upstream role. That makes this Avioxx news a clear bullish signal for those paying attention.

📢 Bottom Line: Avioxx’s SAF breakthrough proves the downstream demand is real. And PHE is perfectly placed to help supply it.

We're no longer talking about "potential." We're now in the stage of technology convergence, ecosystem validation, and strategic positioning. You don’t want to be waking up to this after the market re-rates it.

@The0ne Well done. This is a troll-invested BB. They never got over the fact that Bob created the PHE TG to hedge the investment community. Hence the hatred here. Glad you are here. They do not own you or me or anyone else with an opinion. Keep up the great work.

@jancux01 It didn't take much for your mask to slip, did it? Now we see the real you. Looks like you ditched the generic GPT. You're just another troll attempting to deramp the share price for your masters.

@The0ne WOW. Great job, my friend. Pretty amazing, huh? It seems many of these "investors" are so motivated to keep the SP down. What strikes me, though, is how much anger and aggression is seeping out of their souls. Many are full of hate. It's very odd behaviour, don't you think? Keep up the great work. I'm glad you're here. They truly are triggered and threatened by your presence. They can't take it, can they? :)

Red Hornet, a prolific and anonymous poster active on the Powerhouse Energy Group forum of the LSE Bulletin Board. Over the course of nearly two years, this account has exhibited a systematic pattern of behaviour that raises serious concerns for both the integrity of market discussion and the well-being of retail investors.

🔍 Key Discussion Points: Repeated Personal Harassment: The account has launched sustained, ad hominem attacks targeting specific individuals, frequently mocking, slandering, or attempting to discredit with no evidence-based reasoning — a violation of civil discourse and likely platform policy.

Disinformation at Inflexion Points: Posts from Red Hornet tend to spike in frequency during critical share price junctures, suggesting tactical attempts to induce fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) to manipulate sentiment—behaviour that can materially impact micro-cap price movements.

Contradictory and Bad-Faith Argumentation: Despite demanding facts from others, Red Hornet routinely relies on sarcasm, selective data, and misleading narrative techniques without providing verifiable counterpoints or honest analysis.

Absence of Constructive Input: There is no history of balanced, well-researched commentary on PHE’s financials, RNS releases, or technological development — only persistent denigration and nihilism, indicating a likely agenda.

Psychological Profile Indicators: A textual pattern emerges pointing to traits often seen in pathological trolling — narcissistic projection, obsession with individual users, binary thinking, and a lack of empathy or interest in actual company progress or investor welfare.

Failure of Platform Moderation: Despite sustained patterns of abuse, LSE moderators have not acted to protect retail users or enforce basic standards of civil engagement, leaving victims of coordinated harassment unprotected. This user needs to be removed and banned from this platform.

@TheOnce Classic. hahahahahah

Let’s be absolutely clear: https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1071797/powerhouse-energy-s-engsolve-is-in-a-very-strong-position-icymi-1071797.html

Over £1 million in contracts landed in early 2025. Engagements across hydrogen, bio-methanol, aluminium recycling, and carbon nanotubes.

Clients include National Hydrogen, Wastefuel (US), and multiple tech innovators. PHE’s subsidiary is not theory — it’s executing. Now.

Engsolve is increasingly attracting new-tech developers to its pilot plant ecosystem — precisely what strategic scale-up looks like. This is the kind of progress that doesn’t just “keep the lights on” — it builds commercial credibility, talent attraction, and partner leverage.

While some anonymous posters keep spinning tales of “phase one stasis,” the actual company is delivering tangible outputs across clean energy frontiers. The market is watching. And so should you. Don’t take my word for it — read the update yourself and ask who’s really offering insight, and who’s just stuck on repeat.

@Plantdad You carry on hiding behind your computer. The definition of a coward. All talk no action. A real "hard man"

@jancux01 Listen to my chat with Trifusion here. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZDg8Eob-equpmvGKDsq0Wl8VgCYlNrFM/view?usp=sharing

🔍 Objective Breakdown – This voice chat delivers a comprehensive, fact-based analysis of recent claims made by JanCux01, cutting through noise and spin with clear data and technical logic.

🧠 Expert Technical Analysis – We dive into real engineering concepts, TRL classifications, and project execution milestones to expose inconsistencies and speculative positioning.

📉 Misleading Narratives Exposed – The reply from JanCux01 is deconstructed as a low-resolution GPT-style deflection tactic that avoids tangible risk-to-execution timelines.

📊 Real Market Indicators Discussed – We contrast FUD with actual data points: revenue traction, insider buying, FEED progression, patent momentum, and strategic positioning.

🕵️ Anonymous vs Transparent – Unlike those hiding behind avatars, this conversation comes from named analysts with a proven research and charting record—31,000+ charts and counting.

🧱 Final Word on the Debate – The reply is not just rebutted—it’s outclassed. This isn’t forum chatter. It’s structured thinking backed by verified sources and decades of capital markets insight.