Are we massively underpricing survival?2 Apr 2026 17:58
Hear me out. Ferrexpo might actually be one of the greatest most asymmetric, binary setups out there right now.
At today’s distressed price, the downside looks bad but not horrible. If you take the 2025 H1 balance sheet and apply a harsh liquidation discount. I applied 32%, you end up with roughly 300–320M USD of realizable assets. After settling liabilities, that leaves about 70M USD for equity holders, or roughly 0.09 GBP per share.
So in a worst-case liquidation scenario, you’re looking at recovering maybe 20–25% of your investment, i.e., a 75–80% loss, plus a long wait to see any cash. Not pretty, but at least somewhat bounded.
Now the other side;
There are several binary catalysts that could dramatically re-rate the stock:
(A) Securing financing which removes immediate survival risk. (Besides in the future you could always buy back shares)
(B) VAT receivable resolution which would equal +80M in liquidity
(C) Legal case dropped equals minus $117M in liabilities
(D) End of the war normalization of operations and volumes
If even a couple of these break the right way, you’re no longer looking at a liquidation case but a going concern with meaningful earnings power again.
This stock could under war conditions easily go 300% , and 1000% post war. Yet the downside is 80%.