Member Info for Suzki

No sure, it's part of the financial section.

See todays Daily Mail. Despite my recent grumblings I continue to hold.

A year ago today we closed at 6.65p. It would appear you have more confidence in Jo than the markets or investors. Since mid 2022 the SP has been in reverse. There would appear to be a fundamental problem with AYM and for me it's BOD.

There seems to be renewed interest these past few days in AYM but SP still no going anywhere. Must be loads of shares up for offer.

Why was it a local councilor and not a member of the BOD that was interviewed on Welsh BBC.I know they were to busy elsewhere with their other directorships to put in any effort and actually get to Anglesey.

Boys, Boys it's extremely distasteful to talk of ones wealth, I can't right now as the Valet has just brought my morning coffee.

Locals have heard it all before, saying at best it will create 150 jobs if it ever happens.

More drilling! are they having a laugh.

Typo should read point (b) opps.

As those on this BB no all to well I'm a LTH but I fail to understand how you can hold an asset like Parys for thirty plus years and not develop it on the pretext that the time is not right.
If the BOD were not also the majority shareholders they would have been vote out many years since and collected their P45s. I understand that during that time they have not drawn a salary but that makes no difference you are there to act in the interests of your shareholders (US). Moving the company to AIM gives them less responsibility to shareholders, nice one BOD.
We own 12% of LIM through subsidiaries? correct me if I'm wrong, that makes us third party holders (not worth a carrot).
Grangesberg is never going to happen anyone who thinks otherwise is due a visit from the men in white coats. Given it's geographic location and alleged resources (a) why did it close (b) why have the big boy's not shown an interest (c) who amongst the BOD decided it was a good investment.

Let us go back to point (c) the big players are not interested in developing mines they want other idiots to do the job for them, then they can mount a buyout with little cost to themselves.

Our biggest asset is Parys. Even this is not a done deal let us not forget that QME are working for a considerable % of future profits something which may well impact on the companies ability to raise funds for the development of said mountain.
Lim has little to no baring on the SP, Our interest in Grangesberg should be sold off (if a muppet can be found to buy it) and any monies raise used to fund Parys.

My condolences to family of Howard Miller, a sad passing at this time of year.

Not wishing to labour the point but ours is still in the ground. All those companies listed are in production.

I concede that trading at this time of year can be very slack. People taking their money out for whatever reason. My gripe being and everyone on this BB will probably be sick of my going on is lack of information. Yes mining is a complex business, things take time, an indication of progress plus a time frame would not go amiss. My breakeven point is around 3.8p if SP ever reaches such a dizzying level in the near future I may well sell down my holding. If things look to improve beyond that then I'll hold. I'm not desperate to sell at a loss.

Tempus Fugit. Another year almost at a close, Zilch! share price in reverse ! clearly you have more faith in Jo than the market and share holders, who if you look at the trades over the last week or so they are nearly all sells the buys being very small ones in volume. Some days no trades at all. Jo seems to have slotted in to the inertia of the board quite easily. He may be working flat out on our behalf but there is very little evidence in the way of announcements to support that theory perhaps he's to busy with his other commitments.
Yes it is the 21st century and we expect more from the BOD than perhaps in previous times so lets all hope that they can pull something out of the bag for 2023. Don't hold your breath.

No mention of any activity for the 20th century, that's about par for the course ( there hasn't been any) well not in recent times.

Would be the answer as we don't have full control of Grangesberg. It would also leave AYM less reliant on borrowed money.

The BOD have been playing at being miners for the past thirty years despite not a single ounce of anything being produced, and their still at it. Though I do concede that things seem to be moving in the right direction at long last.
With regards to Grangesberg, Swedish iron ore is/has always been regarded as high quality so why did the mine close in 1990? There has always been a market for high grade ore, one reason Hitler wanted to get his hands on it.
For me we need to get Parys up and running before throwing money at Grangesberg which in my opinion could be a big black hole.

Six miles from Prestatyn. Grangesberg I don't count as an asset it's not a resumption of works but a total start up from scratch. Surface infrastructure exposed to the ravages of thirty plus years of weather and no doubt vandalism along with flooded mine workings and capped shafts doe's not to my mind represent an asset more a black hole. Plus it is not wholly owned by AYM. Ref six month report finance could be tricky for Parys let a lone Grangesberg given the geopolitical situation at present.

I'm a LTH 20+ years off and on so looking for a return on my investment but a present that return is evaporating at warp speed.

I accept your post with regards to Parys but the situation at Grangesberg is surely different a point which you have not addressed.

From their own web site. Workings flooded, shafts capped, mine abandoned 1990. Me thinks this would take serious folding stuff to bring back into production, asset more like a mill stone.

AYM don't have the where withal to develop any of the so called assets. There is never any mention of funding.