Member Info for Suthy

There has to be an element of trust in the company you are invested in. Asking for NDA's is a very unusual thing to do.
It is very rare to tell porkies about that in an RNS as it could land FG in hot water. These are the times you need to be strong and do your OWN research, do not let other coerse you into decisions that you may not have made on your own.

Jeez who the hell is this guy? He must be an expert on Quantum to challenge FG. As Miker states RNS's cannot have false truths in them and FG has already shared his first patent results with us. Don't get taken in by these people, just read the RNS's and decide for yourself.

agreed both, the potential here is quite rare to find. It is definitely worth being patient with this one. Nothing in life is guaranteed but i do think this could be a monstrous rerate if they deliver

Thanks 600, i feel that that now we are out of the closed period news will flow soon enough. Could do with BTC moving in the right direction which will help

miker- you are not alone with this thought process, i also found the RNS quite positve as well. Although FG did not not go all out and say how successful things are, he gave a good few snippets which were very encouraging. Like "step change" and "consistent results" . etcc......I am not going anywhere as i know the full potential of what this could mean

Thanks guys. In terms of being patient i am not in a hurry at all. I have worked in this industry and i know how big this task is and it is massive. I likie the progress so far and the confidence from the last RNS was quite interesting. AI , Quantum etc are the future and being pateient here could prove to be very rewarding if thety have a sniff of success. The wider macro environment is playing a big factor here with BTC at a very low price right now. We are linked and so to be fair there is nothing FG can do about this except plough on with the testing which they are doing.

Willwont- its difficult to get an idiots guide to this as it probably the most complex thing you can do and its so niche that i don't anyone would understand it even if they did. I went on a basic blockchain course once and that was hard enough.
These guys are all PHD bods and are hyper intelligent.

I requested from PR when FG will do an interview and they have confirmed that they will ask him. They added that they beleive FG is planning to do something for shareholders. The exact response is below

" I will ask him, though i'm sure his plans include doing something for shareholders to add more detail on what they are working towards"

600- you have raised a good point. The breadth of the research is staggering and this research takes a while. I am taking a steer from the last RNS (which states two months of testing). I really do believe that FG is going for something very speacial here and is aiming to mine in a much more efficient manner. The use of the word "step change" is incredible when you are talking about a sector worth hundreds of $billions (was valued at $1 trillion before drop in BTC). Most LTH's are fully committed here now and understand that this type of research is hard to quantify. However, in saying that i agree with your point on not making statements that shareholders will latch onto.

Well we will see. As long as the news is good I am
not too concerned about when it comes out. Although
I still feel we will get some news in back end of July .
I have been saying that for a few weeks . Let’s see what happens

I was actually ok with the results as £ 2.635m of the loss is due to share options .
There were also some hints of good progress being made. We knew we are not revenue generating so it was to be expected and still in the research phase , hopefully mining at some point soon.

Steve- to be fair I accept that the current price of BTC is a large factor
in this situation and as a potential miner it is only to
be expected that we track BTC which is pants right now.
The last RNS (accounts) talked about consistency and
leader in the market so obviously they must still be
quite confident. The closed period is now done as you say so I am expecting
some key news now over the next few weeks. The operation update RNS asked
for two months as I mentioned before and it is barely
6 weeks. The next update I believe will be a very interesting one and
if successful could set the share price on its way. It’s still remains
one of those shares I do not want to be out of or even consider de-risking at
this stage. There is just too much news on the horizon and quantum computing is
up and coming now

600- as a key employee who has performed it is
probably in FG’s interests not to extend. Although
to get to 5p by the second week of August 22 is a tall order
the way the markets are.

Ultimately the employees of QBT are the real assets here.
FG will be aware that he needs to keep them happy to achieve his goal.
These share options will need to be honoured

SteamyWee- yes there is very little discusion around the company's activities which is always a key sign what there motives are. Unfortuantely their tactics do work on some investors (not the savvy ones ). They will dissapear when the share price rises. It is something I have accepted over the years.

Yes that is a good question why have all these dodgy characters suddenly appeared. I have learnt over thr years that trolls only visit boards they know have potential and they will generally attack the low point so they can get in and out with a quick buck. Just filter them and move on. There are some good posters with constructive arguments, this particular crew do not fall into that category.

BTC price is paying a huge part right now and when it turns for a bull run which will happen at some point (soon i hope) the share price will move with it. The testing news and the patent filing will have a big impact on the share price. Any hint of real mining it will rerate immediately. Lots of news due just need to be patient in the meantime.

The board was a really nice one, but unfortunately when the share price dropped the rats came out to play. When it goes up they disappear.

Good post Colin - exactly.

Fair enough swerve, yes overramping is not good either