Member Info for Steadydanny

I think we could see some money from EUA soon.

I agree.

Developed by p2f but maybe in conjunction with the mother of keep it quiet nanotechnology having a law case with who? Fks sake these polite individuals are about to be well rewarded. This is huge. Imo.

Ed. The .material is being run already.

Tex im a bit of a longexranger. No success story. But on a hunch given gareths calling favours I reckon nanococo are possibly relevant.check it out.

Ps Tex. Let me know what you think about the nano technology querie. As in who has developed the technology that might be under licence.

Tex. A St Emillion is a magnificent choice. Anyway cheers. I appreciate we digressed. Well I did. Nice to see that some that have the balls to comment are proper investors.

I tried blossom hill. Oh my. But I will recommend for about 12 pounds. Bon terra. An organic Californian wine. Zinfandel. Rhymes with waitrose company selling it. Let it breath for a bit or just neck it . My first wine awareness point. Anyhow . I think this company sp will be played but it's rather noteable it's got a unique position and taste of potential. Sorry but the missus just got out the shower and we are going to eat pate.

Medoc 86 St Julien. The circumstances came late and the late rain assisted with the vintage. Rather a unique vintage given the unknown. I advise everyone reading this to try it if you can. Rather magnificent.

Some of you are seeing the product. And that's Brilliant. But where has the ability to create the nano technology come from? . It dosnt grow on nano trees. Sorry had a rather nice Bordeaux. So a bit expressive. Why are the buys daily outweighing the sells? So just muppets buying? Off laying the warrants as a given responsibility. I thought this might end up in a shell. I will continue to hold. And add if it drops for the next 2 months. Classic AIM tactics. Back to the 86 Bordeaux.

Lawrmyer. 1815. Adam Smith. Law of Supply and Demand. Basic economics. Like day one of economics. Not sure if you are on this bb to promote RMS or disrepute it. Where do you stand? As if someone is dismissing it then why would they bother to comment. Surely you understand my sentiment. Are you in or out?

Sad old git. I wish you would change your name. It is refreshing to discuss things on this bb with a balanced individual. I agree the incorporation of a new machine and getting it to work as agreed by the manufacturer. Like yourself I have experience in production. But military contracts. My goodness PFG would scrutinise the primary, secondary and even tertiary suppliers to get value for taxpayers money. I would meet them at Bristol and give evidence of costs. I cant comment on the product but it's well known. The government are under scrutiny for ppe contracts. Leave that there. A save face scenario is required in my reckoning. I see the snipes some make here. Can only assume shorters. Imho. If you donr mind me asking, I am on other bb and actually say nothing, but you mentioned earlier nano technology and its patent possibilities. If we are singing of the same sheet and location re Gareth cave mentioning calling in favours and where production is then time will tell. Ps change your name to oldbutnotdaft. All best Steadydanny

Law it adds liquidity does it not? That a tick in my box.

Hi hilly. But would RMS not have undertaken some due diligence to protect machinery investment and production capability?

Cheers sadoldgit. Polite response . So are we of the opinion that RMS has the sole UK rights for White Label Manufacturing re the mask? Definitely a rather lively bb. All best Steadydanny

I appreciate a bit of banter here. But back to business. As RMS are going to be producing these masks and we are of the opinion Volz will be (numbers kept quiet), will RMS have the sole distribution rights of the masks within the UK of licensed out production (Volz so far) to be the sole importer of a quantity of Volzs until production could/can be ramped up by RMS to meet UK requirements? I mean you dont have two companies selling on one turf do you? All best Steadydanny

The news was rather positive. I wonder if another regulatory response happens to back up innovates grant.

Hawi. I hear what you say but I'm of the inclination that the law firm representing us have advised to only report when necessary in line with LSE guidelines. They are not required to do anymore. They would be very aware of a Norwich Pharma Order, and would and will carry on doing what they do well. And today's RNS imho was rather more significant than the market has realised. I feel sometimes investors want a massive spike on news, but that's when the day traders play the sp. I'm just happy to be here at this time.

Hawi. If I was part of a significant ongoing law case I would probably hold my cards close to my chest with regards to media news. However, I would also try to engage funding from noteable parties in regards to intellectual property and its potential, thus they are invested in said company and being more clout. Especially homegrown technology. And try and keep it 'local' with license agreements and global white label manufacturing. Then the David and Goliath scenario builds gently and quietly. My grandmother was a very astute businesswoman and always said less is more. Softly softly catchey.....

I'm wondering if we partake in the white label Manufacturing for the nano copper mask. Volz are onboard but wont comment on numbers. When is the Texas plant operational?