Member Info for Stackhigher

Hope and prayer. Wowzers.

Add ludicrous fantasies and half-baked conspiracy theories and you'll fit right in here!

"Personally I wouldn't want to be out of this at all let alone this weekend."

Last Friday. Followed by a flat week. Can we expect similar nonsense from you every Friday, affrm?

"a lot of pressure"... He's threatening to vote against them with all 7 of his shares 🤣

Paste the bit where someone from solg promised an asx listing.

You're a nut job. Get help.

Didn't read. Funny how you base your 'arguements' (not really strong enough to warrant the term) on nothing but Facebook posts, but studies and reports that easily counter your points have to be derided as 'left wing' or 'paid science'. Ever consider you're lacking an evidence based, poppet? Trump has gifted the rest of the world an advantage in clean energy - his poor successor will be playing catch up. Thankfully even oil-rich red states like Texas can see which way the wind is blowing (pun gloriously intended). Sorry, dinosaur- can't halt progress 😁

Rule for life. Read something slug posts, assume it's wrong, do even the simplest bit of research and realise, hey presto, he's chatting nonsense.

https://www.energymonitor.ai/news/climate-council-report/?cf-view

Works every time 👍

Which IIs are collecting, jack? 🤣 Distinct lack of public declarations... They must be very small!

This guy gets more desperate by the hour. Is it someone else's money you've chucked in to be underwater, pal?

Explaining that drops are based on low volume is not the work of a shorter. Failing to understand the basics of trading shares before investing is the work of someone looking to be parted from their money. Either way, nonsense about manipulation is always the last resort of the desperate 🥽

If he doesn't realise they are fantasies, he's a simpleton. I assume it's a hyper rampy act- nobody could actually be that wrong.

No, it's volume affrm. Do some reading- there are 'idiots' guides' out there. You'll get it.

Notice how I'm not rubbing your nose in today's drop, jack. It's a question of confidence. You know your fairytales are just that: I know my analysis of the years this has to run is grounded in mining investment experience. This might be worth £1bn (30p) when we have everything in place to generate cash. Until the, traders are very happy with 15p (or 14, or wherever this ends the week).

Top tip- definitely don't top up at these inflated highs 👍

It's volume, affrm.

That was easy. Saved a worker at the broker having to explain trading 101 to a first-timer 👍

Ikr, Mathers. It's like arguing with wallpaper paste sometimes. The kid is tapped.

I think you must have missed the re-rate, jack. We're now at a much healthier 15p. Twice what we have been. Much more like fair value for a company that has some of the legal rights to mine a deposit deep underground, but only access to a fraction of the cash needed to make it happen in a few years time.

Few more years to run here, lots of bumps along the way. Don't be taken in by the underwater fantasists - TINTO

*here

Nice try. Doesn't change the fact we need a f***tonne more cash and we ain't going to get it for free. If nobody believes we will build this thing, perhaps the lack of II investment points to the idea nobody believes we can fund it, either. Nobody wants a stake in a tiny minority partner

Delays are not likely to be down to corporate action, jack. That's a fantasy. Meanwhile in the real world we're considering the massive cost increases we don't have the cash to fund.

Thanks for your fairytales, though. They remind other potential investors that only complete fantasists would believe we're on the verge of a takeover.

Pot, kettle add. Highlight where you've accepted a few of your numerous mistakes. Demonstrate your famous humility. We'll wait 👍

Nice try, pbow. I'm obviously talking about the initial $1.6bn latched onto by the rampers. You've said yourself that overall cost will be much higher than the pfs claimed. Do you agree that the idea we only need another $950m over the FN/O input to start construction is nonsense?

If they are poor (most likely reason for delays) then we're going to need some huge cash to make up for the inflation adjusted capex. The jokers here pretending this will cost the $1.6bn or whatever they initially said are having a laugh. Huge block cave like the one we require is going to be another $2bn on top of FN/O raise, at least, by the time it's done. We'll have to accept a partner, and the terms will be horrendous if they're a worth 10-200x our mcap

But sure, it's probably all fine lads. £1 tomorrow and all that. Look at all the II money that's poured in since the recent rise! Oh, wait.... Never mind.