Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Anyone who reads ADVN I have noticed a correlation between what I post and what another poster who goes by the hadle lovepeaceandharmony writes. The contents of his posts duplicate mine. For the record he has nothing to do with me and I'm unsure of what game he is playing
I'll give you an insight, if you take it on board you can manage your expectations if you think I'm a liar then it's no skin off my nose and call me as many names as you want it comes with the territory.
A RNS will not drop before the AGM as I have told you and no not tomorrow either, point 2 no clear concise answers on the CTA will be released tomorrow it will be vague and will leave all investors with more questions. This will get sorted but NOT YET wait for the new year, where I suspect further data testing is required that bit is speculation, on a more positive note all noises are good it will proceed and the CTA will be granted.
Now use this information as you see fit, you can't fight the market tail winds, its happening deal with it, name calling and copying and pasting positive data changes nothing. The current fundamentals have to play out. I'll leave it there and won't reply to any daft comments as it's too time consuming.
The market knows this hence the drop, be under no illusion it will drop sub 50p,
Ahfam I call people out who suck new investors in promising them the world its not morally right as you know who ever they may be and I think you have your latest victim in fanti, if the CTA is accepted then your assumptions pose a possibility certainly not yet let's keep it real
No Ahfam you would say that, majority of people who would say damn my investment has gone down.
The market price has caught up, it is where it should be, 2 compounds handed back in 2 years and the CTA rejected and the market awaits answers, I'd suggest the price is exactly where it should be.
You say nothing has failed we have never ever taken a compound into clinic, but the first time we attempt to the CTA has been blocked, likewise 2 compounds handed back and no reasons given. If you view this as success maybe try your hand in crypto, most would say its nothing more than a ponsai scheme you would say its a mete blip
Ahfam you have been caught out with your over the top optimism on numerous occasions which has dented your credibility here. The month of the rerate being the most famous as you well know. Ironically it did rerate but not in the way your were ramping. I'll keep calling you out AHFAm as you will suck people in with your guff
Ahfam you have been caught out with your over the top optimism on numerous occasions which has dented your credibility here. The month of the rerate being the most famous as you well know. Ironically it did rerate but not in the way your were ramping.
Listen all you have mentioned I'm not disputing, the aspirations and objectives of Sareum are all true, but you have to step back and realise what a company intends to do and what is happening on the ground are totally different.
Yes I do believe that we will head in that direction in time, but not yet we have real hurdles staring us down that have to be dealt with first. CTA acceptance, read the tweet again, it does not state it has been granted. I keep saying this and at some point it will sink in.
Let's deal in the here and now facts. Get this timeline in your heads and we can remove this unnecessary tension on this BB. No CTA RNS prior to the AGM, no real answers on when this will be concluded at the AGM and expect this to conclude in January 2023. The share price slipping to 50p is in the bag I'd suggest because of the uncertainty that will hang around until January, yes again JANUARY.
Also, there is NO takeover discussions behind the scenes, CTA acceptance is our only focal point. I won't keep defending this position at some point this will sink in
Reckon you might be onto something there num..... my posting from several weeks ago
I'm not expecting an RNS until sometime after the AGM. We will be no nearer to knowing what has gone wrong here on conclusion of the AGM, I don't want people to get their hopes up that we will have answers at the AGM.
With the risk of getting a few people excited here, I expect the eventual RNS to state that further data analysis in relation to the preclinical toxicology and safety studies will need to be carried out. This prolonged silence is pointing towards the final report that was produced by the contract research organisation that conducted the studies for Sareum as being flawed.
The preclinical toxicology study report produced was the key to the CTA application being granted. This is where I believe the fault lies. The board know they will get crucified if this RNS comes out before the AGM, this will land on our laps in the coming weeks before the year is out.