I have looked at the link you have posted but I'm not quite sure why you reference it, as it has nothing to do with myself, as I have never posted on the action group board, but may be it has something to do with you?
Thanks again. I wish you well. And before anyone says anything again, I am not connected nor do I know Litigation101, but Litigation101, would I be right in thinking you just might be Mr Farr-Jones by the fact that you have hyphenated your last comment? Is that a clue? You also seem to emphasize your reference to private emails which you have put in quotes? Best wishes anyway.
Thanks for the quote, it appears I said "for those" which is a generalisation, but my apology to Duxi still stands if I offended Duxi.
I did so because there was a clear spelling mistake and I was also being wound up by others at the time, namely red bike, but duxi I am happy to apologise to you, and do so, if I caused any offence to you, because it is not in my nature to offend . It's a pity that red bike can't do the same for me, but there we have it. Anyway, after all the batterings I have taken on here, mainly at the hands of those actually fronting an 'action group'., as I said, I wish everyone the best, and for the last time just to reiterate, I have nothing to do with the company whatsoever. Also, gonchgrangehill, I wish you the best, and thank you for your support.
I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that a lot of people on here have selective memories! Ifyou remember, I posted some 2 to 3 weeks ago, that I know nothing about the company, I simply invested a small amount about an hour before the shares were suspended, because I read a ramp saying that the shares were going to take off very rapidly. That is my fault, no one elses, I invested without doing any research, but having done so, and then seeing events unfold, I didn't feel able to comment on the company or its BOD's because I didn't know anything and haven't the history of this BB like a number on here, but I did feel that I could contribute with suggesting some ways in perhaps doing something proactive, but I was shot down, my professional integrity called in to question as well by red bike and a number of others, and insulted, so what was the point of trying to put my view and offer some help when people just batter me? I sincerely wish you all well, I always have since I first joined in some 3 weeks ago, but to satisfy those who keep barking at me, I'll go away now, because clearly they know best!
I don't recall calling duxi any names, just simply pointing out a spelling mistake. You on the other hand, you have called me a number of names, and also described me as an infiltrator. Shame on you. I actually tried to help with constructive advice, but you wouldn't listen to anything I had to say, because you were so busy bleating on about rubbish, so don't blame me for your shortfalls. And UP, I am not getting at you, but your last post could be construed as a threat to Mr Karstell, so everyone needs to be very careful as to what they write on a public BB, as I have said before.
Hi Duxi, I'm genuinely relieved that you will be okay, that's good to know, and it's a terrible thing for those who have lost, every one, but sadly that's the name of the game with AIM. I notice the person who chose to fire personal insults at me, during the past 3 weeks, which LSE removed once I reported him, is now conspicuous with his absence, namely red bike! Anyway, as I have said, as it is now far too late for legal action, in my humble opinion, it would be of great assistance to the administrators I imagine, if the action group did do a full summary, as I mentioned, as to what they know, and back it with hard facts including emails and articles etc. At least the administrators should respond, so that at least you will hopefully get some answers to some of your concerns. I hope for everyones sake something can be salvaged, but bearing in mind it will take the administrators some time to sort the mess out, and the mounting debt, I don't think people should get their hopes up, but that is simply my opinion. Best wishes all.
As I have said before, I know very little about company/commercial law, but I would think this is your last chance as an action group to now get your representations in, and fast, to the administrators, Baker Tilly. I would suggest you do it simply in one document, and that you list the points you wish to make in bullet form, numbering them, and that you back each and every allegation you wish to make with FACTS, but I would suggest from what I can see, that time is of the essence. The more help you can give to the administrators the better, but this is just my view, that is all as I know nothing, as has already been pointed out to me on this Board on numerous occasions in the last 3 weeks.
For the umpteenth time, I have nothing at all to do with the company, I have just been watching you lot make absolute fools of yourselves that's all. You wouldn't listen to what I was trying to say. If you had, you might have just salvaged something, so I'm sorry, but you only have yourselves to blame. The fact is n one is likely to get anything now, and I actually feel sorry for the likes of duxi, as I was trying to help. Anyway, the one good thing is that Baker Tillys are good accountants, and I am sure they will leave no stone unturned.
announcement in.
Thank you for your vote of no confidence. My posts have not been deleted to my knowledge. As advised to the rude litigation101, I am female. Andy, please advise of your insurance company details for the action group as red bike was clearly speaking on behalf of the action group when he hurled personal insults at me at the weekend. I await the details please by return. I assume you have indemnity insurance bearing in mind you are an organisation offering advice to others as an 'action group'? I honestly don't know why you don't ask on this bb if there is a commercial/company lawyer out there who would be kind enough to simply offer a little bit of pro bono advice for the action group, but as I say, it may be too late now, but better late than never.
As I said previously, it would have been worth getting legal advice, it might be that an injunction can be obtained to seize some assets, but you are leaving it too late. All I got was personal insults from red bike who seems to prefer to wade in and attack every one including the BoD, and in my opinion, that is not the way to deal with a delicate situation such as this. Andymkdon please would you also make quite clear in all postings by the action group that it is on behalf of the action group and NOT all shareholders, as a communication this morning made it sound as though the action group were speaking on behalf of all shareholders and this is not the case. You must differentiate and make clear that the group is speaking only on behalf of those involved in the group at the present time. My own opinion is that you will be well advised to listen to Jonah who spoke very eloquently and correctly. I'm afraid the rantings which have taken place by certain members of the action group have probably sealed the fate of all shareholders now, and IMO it would have been more prudent to await to have heard from the company to see if any deal could be struck, and report to relevant authorities thereafter, once shareholders have received an offer and been paid. Now your efforts for what they are worth, have simply been flushed down the drain by the looks of it. For future reference, IMO, as I have said before, always take advice before beginning the crusade, from lawyers and accountants, so you have your ammunition to hand in advance and not wade in to battle empty handed. Just my view. I sincerely hope for those who have lost a lot that something can be salvaged, but it looks unlikely.
Andy may I make a suggestion? It is just that. That you ascertain who the company,s lawyers are and send your email to them requesting that they please answer on behalf of their client company? Just a thought but don't want to be verbally abused by anyone please in response.
I have already reported.
Good job I don't have a "willy" then as you put it. Good luck though to those who do have one, you'll need it! The good luck that is!
I agree wholeheartedly. It concerns me that this is exactly how you get dictatorships. It worries me that there has been no democratic vote as to whether to have an action group and a vote as to who should lead it. Instead, they have rushed in, formed it,, and not sat and thought about strategy nor consult with shareholders. They say they have done a poll and produced figures of percentages in favour of this and that, but how many shareholders are there, how many are in the action group, and how many of the action group as compared to shareholders overall voted in favour of the issues they say they have polled, and how were the questions put? This is not democratic, this to me is a collection of very angry people who seem to infer that they will stop at nothing to get what they want, and low and betide anyone who stands in their way. Furthermore, there are members who seem to be insultive and disrespectful to others, and who I firmly believe will harass shareholders if they get hold of the voting register. I do not want to be a part of this operation as it stands, it fills me with nothing but fear and dread, and personally I don't think it will achieve their objective and is the wrong way of going about things, but it has been made clear to me who am I to dare speak out against them. I can only think of the saying "only fools rush in" and to me it seems quite apt. I am not against an action group, just not one that has been formed in this fashion with henchmen at the ready.i can well understand how you felt at that Egm you attended that you mention and that precisely fills me with dread here. I am fighting the same cause as all here, but just don't believe the action group as formed has the temerity to be respected bearing in mind some of their postings on here. That is just my view which I am posting to you Litigation101. If others want to read it fine, but I don't want their responses nor for them to insult me any further.
I've said all I want to say, I've tried to suggest things but I have been shot down, for no good reason in my view. I genuinely wish you all the very best. I will be letting the data protection agency know that I do not want my personal details divulging to anyone from the share register. No doubt BHR have probably made a similar representation and that is why it hasn't been released to all and sundry. GLA.
There is no point bothering with these people as they are on a crusade of their own and obviously don't realise how they will come across if challenged in a court arena. It's not the worth the effort. The sad thing is that I live in London and would have supported the cause but not with this behaviour from them, I don't want to be associated with it. My view remains that it is best to await the outcome of the authorities investigations and then make appropriate representations but they won't listen so let them run their crusade, and good luck to them. And for the record I repeat to those who keep bashing on about new posters, I am not new to LSE, I have posted on other boards, I have nothing to do with BHR and anyone within the company other than i hold a small amount of shares which I purchased an hour before the suspension took place because someone posted on here that this company was going far and as my investment was so small, it didn't matter to me whether I was lucky or not.
I have already said I don't know enough about the company, I have already said I am a genuine poster. I am also glad I am not heavily invested here and not involved with the action group as things stand. Would you like my DNA?!! Thank you Litigation101 for your support and so eloquently put. It's a shame when people try to help that they get shot down like this and it shows these people up for what they are, only interested in their own self worth, not others as they try to claim, and revenge, at any cost. I have no desire to associate myself with it as this is not how an action group should behave in my opinion and I hope others feel the same.
Yes, at £40 it could still prove to be a good buy! Good bye !