Member Info for Soupdragon78

Thanks again Older.

The comment about reprofiling is important imho. Drug companies want to know that they have ownership of a product and its IP, this is naturally harder to pin down with repurposed or reprofiled drugs. Hence the desire of secured IP and Orphan Designation which, as I mentioned earlier, provides product protection for 10 years.

Thanks Older, very useful to know.

On the subject of why.... why do you care so much about this failing NFTs?

Lucky you've got no interest here then.

Can you tell me how they will issue 277m shares?

Incorrect. They have elected not to take payment of their salaries until such time as the business holds sufficient funds to

enable them to do so.

Seriously NFTs, if you're going to bluster at least sound like you know what you're talking about. Read the AGM resolutions from last year and this year before you make anymore pointless comments.

Meanwhile NXP004 has had its Japanese patent granted.

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=JP407637337&_fid=US410558972

Since there is some chat around 'Orphan drug designation' its worth a look at what this entails.

Firstly, it is intended for rare conditions and provides protection from competition once on the market (ten years market exclusivity). So it a good thing in anyones opinion.

Secondly, its to application and designation is free and takes a maximum of 90 days from submittal.

Thirdly, companies applying for designated orphan medicines pay reduced fees for regulatory activities. This includes reduced fees for protocol assistance, marketing-authorisation applications, inspections before authorisation, applications for changes to marketing authorisations made after approval, and reduced annual fees.

We know that the board aren't drawing a salary at the moment and this process is free so not worried there.

If anything any confirmation that they have applied for Orphan status is very good news as it means the IP is secured and they will likely have a product that is protected.

Glad you care about us all NFTs, just remind me.... is this the same placing you said would happen three times before and never materialised?

I have it pencilled in, so hope to be there all things permitting

Don’t worry AJ it won’t get you anything that’s not in the public domain already

Ban family holidays! Sleep is for wimps!

Hi NFT's, how is AVCT doing since you told us to buy at 135p?

Exactly fx, your loyalty despite your dislike for everything about the company is somewhat perplexing.

Then again you’re just scared of missing out.

It’s alright to say it’s fear of missing out FX.

Ok, so another thing to your list of reasons why you’re still invested then.

Not sure why you thought they were ongoing since 2019 when the company said they had stopped.

Takes time FX, signing deals with companies has to go through lots of due diligence and sign off at board levels.

It’s very easy to sit here and expect things to happen, but very different in reality.

Even Alastair Riddell said that deals usual take 6 months or more to come to fruition.

Wash your mouth out Chab!

Haven't got anything concrete but I still have some suspicion that its related to the warrants somehow.

Mostly in the if it was one seller, then they defo crossed a notifiable threshold, unless they were a market maker who don't have to declare below 10% holdings.

I feel one of the MM's were the insti who took on the placing and warrants, with a view to the company tells them when they want/need the cash.

The MM short sells the shares in advance to get the cash to give to the company. Knowing they will get the shares back in the future when they exercise the warrants.

Thats my conspiracy theory anyway.