We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
First it was Mauritania that was supposed to bring us riches. They failed to find a drilling partner even though they said it was very promising. Now that Shell has picked it up you have to wonder... Clearly Shell thinks there is value in our Mauritania licence yet they didn't want to partner with Char. They just waited knowing we didn't have the cash to fulfill our licence obligations and picked it up. They also didn't buy into the whole 29% CoS for Prospect S. You have to wonder why...
What's to stop Shell or any other major for just waiting until Char runs out of money and has to relinquish one licence after another? The lack of partners on Prospect S imo shows they are just going to wait until we have to sell on the cheap or relinquish everything, one at a time.
Larry still gets half his salary in shares so the lower the share price, the more shares that bastard's getting.
Talk about incentive.... He could continue to dilute the stock and in the end just sell the company for 2 or 3 times rock bottom and still make plenty of money during that period through his large salary and boatloads of cheap shares.
What a scumb@g...
And CoS for him to walk away with millions of our money... 100%
I agree, he really needs to go.
I know, that's why i said 'the latest bvllcrap'.
Larry on the other hand isn't an idiot. He's probably the only one who gets to walk away with millions.
CoS for Larry to walk away from Char with millions in his bank account... 100%
He looked a bit like the Joker in that last video at the point where he said "partner, partner partner".
Was almost like he escaped an insane asylum...
I didn't say anything you idiot. I just posted the latest bvllcrap from Chris Oil's Twitter.
Chris Uranium Oil
*********
Derisked & ready for -25% or 20 times #CHAR #ChariotOil what traders do not know is Prospect S has a flat spot oil gas or water #BOR #DARWIN
https://bit.ly/2QB510H
Dadean, Yes, Fairpoint owns 100% of Simpson Millar and the IVA business. David "incompetent" Broadbent together with the Simpson Millar top and Doorway Capital have conjured up a plan here to grab the assets, protect their jobs and screw the shareholders. Doorway Capital are in full control of the entire company since they took over the line of credit. They are very active in everything they hold in their portfolio and they simply refused to provide funding towards the IVA business (Lease issue). The line of credit from Doorway Capital is backed by our assets so when we can't pay they can foreclose and get their hands on all of our assets. Simply holding the assets as it is now still leaves the lease contract intact so what better way than to let the entity (FRP) that signed the lease contract go bust. Best way to get rid of the contract and for Doorway Capital to grab the assets. Normally company assets would be sold to the highest bidder but that doesn't seem to be happening here. Also, most of the company is still running pretty good, it's just the IVA part which is less than 20% of our revenue now. From the company press release: "The Board do not expect this announcement to have a material impact on the planned disposal of the IVA and Claims divisions to a third party, as previously announced on 12 July 2017." That's even weirder, so even after Fairpoint goes bust the IVA business will still be running? How? From a homeless shelter or will someone else pay for the lease? True Master Plan! And a quote from the Simpson Millar team: "It said in a statement: “Whilst we are saddened that this has been a difficult time for Fairpoint Group, it is business as usual at Simpson Millar and we do not anticipate any significant changes as a result of Fairpoint Group’s announcement." http://www.thebusinessdesk.com/northwest/news/2007617-fairpoint-bring-administrators Simpson Millar have more than 500 legal staff and none of them were able to find a way to get out of the lease contract? Anyone who truly believes that is an idiot. So in the end it looks like the IVA part will still be operational and get sold at some point and over at Simpson Millar it's "Business as usual" while they are predicting revenue growth in 2018. The only downside is that Fairpoint shareholders lose everything but i doubt Broadbent, the Simpson Millar top and Doorway Capital really give a $hit! Our only hope is that our major shareholders put up some sort of fight here. Fingers firmly crossed for such a thing.
AUNBoy, Of course the £5M is for Simpson Millar, why the hell would a law firm capital provider give millions to support a business they are shutting down and has no future, makes no sense whatsoever. The reason Simpson Millar requires a lot of funding is because part of the restructuring plan was they were also trying to reduce the number of legal staff by as much as 300 people which would certainly be a drain on cash due to redundancy payments and also shows the legal side of the company is not performing well either. The debt at the end of 2016 was only a couple million higher than anticipated mainly due to the restructuring. Debt started building long before the end of 2016 through the purchase of Colemans, Simpson Millar, merging the two and the regulatory impact on the debt business and big fat earn out payment to the legal top brass. If investors were surprised by the year end debt position they should've done a bit more in the dyor department because the debt position could be seen from a mile away with a little dyor..lol The share price nosedived due to the trading "materially below market expectations" and "significantly lower revenues" statements from the company. This is an illiquid share which can cause massive swings either up or down. Our largest shareholder has continued to hold (even added a bit) their position so the drop is mostly down to small private investors selling an illiquid share which caused the sharp drop. "Because the finance deal only relates to Simpson Millar my guess is they are winding down other parts of the business that are unprofitable." You don't have to "guess" on the winding down part. I have already stated they were winding down the non core debt business. This was also stated by the company. Their plan is to continue a legal services provider. As for the capital injection: They had several £M left under the current credit facility and now they have received £5M of fresh cash. Add to that the £5M in cost saving which according to them should be fully visible in H2 2017. If this isn't enough to see them through to profitablity AUNBoy, it not only means they have been/still are burning millions at an alarming rate but also that the turnaround plan is a complete failure and that there is no viable business here. I doubt that Doorway would have provided the extra millions if that were the case. Their return to profitablity should be in sight otherwise the business is doomed and Doorway are just throwing good money after bad and somehow i seriously doubt those guys are that stupid.
The entire line of credit has been transferred and they have received a new £5M injection of capital. The debt problem has been with this company for many years and they should not require a fresh capital injection after the new £5M funding, the only thing they have to do is turn profitable and start paying down debt, that's it. The reason for a credit facility like this is to prevent share dilution. They don't need a new backer as they are currently fully backed by Doorway Capital. DYOR
Given that they have already found a new backer, why did you post that article?
I think Doorway Capital will make sure they pull their fingers out of their @rses. ;) As far as the restructuring plan goes, i would like to think that Dooway presented them with a clear strategy they would need to implement in exchange for the line of credit so we should see some postive news on that front imo. I doubt they would have agreed to fund the business if the company was going nowhere. As for dilution, i would only support a small placing if it was done at around 30/40p. Given the 52 week high of 121p and 52 week low at current levels a placing at today's price would be a kick in the nuts for long term holders. Also don't want to see a dividend with this company ever again, they should use any future profit to pay down debt or expand the business. Given the extra 5M funding they shouldn't require any extra funds at all before turning profitable again!
AUNBoy, this is very good news. The loan has been transferred to a specialist provider of capital to law firms which seems like the perfect fit. The old business only represents a very small portion of our overall revenue stream and Doorway Capital clearly sees potential in Simpson Millar. They should be able to publish 2016 results very soon and the best part is that there will be no share dilution. :)
He started as CFO in July 2016. AIB seems to be having a problem with our 2017 results, most likely our cash burn, so i would say that's pretty much all on Broadbent, both in his role as CFO and CEO. He was there during the entire restructuring plan as CFO so it seems he 's quite the clown. As i have said before, sheer incompetence. Just hope he's also the kind of clown that can put a smile on our faces at some point. :)
Hilarious, from Broadbent's Linkedin page: Current: "Fairpoint Group PLC, I am looking for a Non-Executive role in a PE or PLC business, which presents significant challenge." Perhaps he should consider a role as a stand-up comedian. lol
Broadbent was made CEO in March, prior to that he was Fairpoint's CFO. Maybe they should just look for someone else entirely. ;) Debt was not a big issue because our cashflow was high enough but apparently this has changed, they should have released a statement on current debt and trading to see what has happened since the end of March.
Agreed ; )
Revenue projections on core business for 2017 is only -15%. Not that shocking and they were already rapidly closing down the non core business. I think the real problem why AIB pulled their support is because the whole 5M cost savings program failed, why else would they still require further funding? Management screwed up on the whole restructuring plan (costing many millions more imo) and i think they are nowhere near profitability, otherwise AIB would have given them the extra bit of time. Revenue is not the issue here, it's their way of spending (or wasting) millions and it's also another clear sign that it's better to use profit to reduce debt instead of paying a dividend.
AUNBoy, my below comment was directed at Arsenewenger where i quoted him to get a response to which sector he was talking about. As far as being quietly optimistic, i also think capital will be available but share dilution would have to be minimal because if they are still nowhere near profitability this will just turn into a massive dilution death spiral. They used a banking facility to prevent share dilution so the best outcome would be to find another bank that would be willing to provide a full line of credit although i'm pretty sure those odds are quite slim.
"No surprise at all. Told you to get out last December. This sector has had its day. Sorry for those who have lost." Which sector would that be?
If costs are still not under control even after the restructuring then management have really screwed things up here. Seems more like sheer incompetence from both the previous and current management. There was still a couple of million left under the current credit facility, add to that the restructuring plan and it looks even more staggering how they managed to f this up. Maybe they should ask some financing from the Simpson Millar top who received millions in performance related earn out payments just months before the business suddenly took a turn for the worse.
It's strange why AIB are refusing support. The current debt position was pretty much already known when these were trading at well over 100p. Also the 5M cost cutting program which should be fully visible in H2 makes it even stranger. There is an underlying profitable business here and combined with the 5M cost cutting it's strange why they would even require further financing. Maybe that's why AIB are refusing support....