Member Info for SlurmsMckenzie

I've personally found the last 2 calls very beneficial, they're good as deep dives adding flesh to the bones of what we already know, and often hinting about potential.

What's more you get additional clues just by hearing the tone of peoples voices.

Good luck anyway Tom

and chin chin. 49.5 hours left.

We're 50 hours away from a conference call which will in the main be positive.

Might I suggest if you have the liver for it just going on a 48 + 2 hour bender and not worrying?

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/comment-regarding-zambia-media-reports-ydfyagthppx9udd.html

Thanks jonah both relevant and interesting, and further evidence that the twitter posters are bs merchants.

The article looks real enough. Although whether or not its true is another issue.

Most of the comments on that tweet are laughable though. About four fake accounts spouting gibberish, including the fake Mushinge account.

Not heard of this and can't find it, what is the gist?

I'm aware he wants to get things moving, which is fair enough.

No, nothing apart from an old article regurgitated on the blue channel.

Thanks TDT

As comprehensive as ever.

(I'm going to stop saying thanks after every post now)

Thanks Wasa.

"In terms of AIM Rules published May 2010 and insofar as it is aware, at 12 April 2021, 19% of the Company’s AIM securities were not in public hands."

I'm a relative newb (well I'll soon be coming up to my first birthday) but has this statement always been there?

off topic.

Sarcasm is still classed as wit though, which was seen as intellectually superior to other forms of comedy.

For example a good old fashioned fart, or slapping somebody with a fish.

Be careful with sarcasm though, use it too much and people think you are being sarcastic when you're actually being nice.

I told the wife she looked great yesteday and she assumed sarcasm took offence and punched me in the balls (which wasn't even witty).

Hi Alnista I think you're talking about things retrospectively not being great if I've understood your message correctly rather than the future direction.

After all why hold otherwise.

Zooming out this has actually been a great share to hold. It's the Aim share I hold that I least worry about.

From time to time people have been spiked, due to the machinations of the market hence I think Brizzle Blue was a bit upset, but long term the picture has been rosy.

To borrow a phrase from the Cryto world , if in doubt - zoom out!

I don't think it would be down for long peggy, there will be the knee jerk reaction as the news is announced , but I think plans C , D and E etc would become clear very quickly.

Stop losses could be dangerous here.

I mean on the 7th May! Sorry this time travelling lark is playing havoc with me.

Hi All,

I've tried to keep on top of the board, but I'm a bit reluctanct at the moment to go back through every message, what are peoples thoughts on squeezing more info out of Jezza at the webcast regarding off takes, I still think they could be the next piece of news ?

Could that be from dilution?

Mushy appeased?

That answer btw CBAX is me interpreting the question as "do I think AIM will be a catalyst?".

Can't see it myself personally.

She'll move when she's ready AIM or Main Market.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Great news about Potash staying in Morocco rather than being shipped to Brazil, it takes a serious amount of effort to see that as a negative (well that's what I herd - baaaaahh!).

I noticed that ... as in the ARCM twitter account has been on it's longest period of silence for

well I can't quite remember

Either they got their wrists slapped because of the additional raise (could be a change of personel) or they're being quiet on purpose because they've been told to be quiet due to things being wrapped up soon.

Not a pressing concern for me, just an observation which will no doubt lead to the account coming back to life tomorrow and tweeting more than an orange man president on Coke.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EML/heads-of-agreement-signed-for-100-offtake-cr2oion5rn1p240.html

Here's the RNS for those that haven't seen it, I'm surprised more isn't made of this. It certainly explains the focus on the Brazilian price.

Can anybody work out who it is based on the description?