Member Info for Slappyfpv

Are you sure? I can't find any reference for this. I did once here him say "never sell at a loss".

I understand it may be better to sell at a loss if an opportunity came up and you need the capital.

I like to see buying shares as betting on a horse, only you get to decide when the race ends. Except of course the business goes bankrupt.

Bless him. Every man needs a hobby...

Depends where you take your averages from and to.

I've done a little googling on this. They are producing blue hydrogen? From natural gas?

"Would be better if they got an institution or HNW individual to do on off market purchase. Would save a lot of money as well."

I hope this is the case. Even better if some entity has already been lined up, waiting for a test result on a certain type of feedstock.

Yes, Castle. Care to share?

That's how I understand it, Filterland. A generic, wide ranging title.

TP3, I see where you're coming from, regarding patent searches, but it was in an RNS, which are heavily searched too.

To whom it mat concern...

Mark Twain said, “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience".

I really do despair in this group.

Good question @Stockwatching. I was going to ask something similar.

There are a few upcoming dates - hot testing initial test result, main feedstock test data, May 1st share options.

Would it be a share dilution? Bank loan? Or something else?

It would be interesting to know what peoples opinions are regarding a possible date, and why.

I'd just me made up if 1 was sold and making the customer money. It'll snowball from there.

Forget the kiln being self sustaining, I'd like to see the companies finances self sustaining.

Thank you Scooby. The royalty plan slipped my mind for some reason regarding multiple builds.

For the love of god, eh?

I know none of you. Red and 15 do seem level headed though.

Thank you Red. From what you have said, it feels to me like they should just sell the patents as an ongoing project. Well, to some company who can roll a lot of units out at pace. A company with a large capital behind them and an experienced team of engineers / sales staff etc.

I feel that if the hot testing goes well, it might be too big for phe to develop as the market demands.

As for Castle, I do find his posts funny, light hearted. But I most certainly do not take them as advice. Some of his posts are gems. But the constant buy buy buy isn't really helping.

"15 lives is spot on, just look at ITM and Ceres.

If PHE is to get to 10p with 4.2 bn shares in issue, they' need to sell an awful lot of W2E plants."

Red. I was going to ask here what people think the market cap could be with that many shares in issue.

I read somewhere that it's around 10x annual income? Have I got that right? So if its 500k per unit per year, that's 800 units for a 10p steady price?

Apologies, Not very clued up on this stuff.

Thank you testpack3. You too. I like your posts. Keep them coming mate.

15. Fully agree.

The short small protest in Scotland proved that.

Now we know PHE isn't completely clean. It uses syngas to heat the kiln. This produces some harmful emissions. Which in itself is not necessarily a bad thing if the end result is a cleaner conversion process from waste to energy than that what already exists.

It would be nice if and when the test data comes in, that these emissions are low and could be quantified in layman's terms. 'This unit can process waste for a city, produce enough power for x amount of kettles and only produces an amount of co2 that a small forest consumes'

Yes, a good spin on things always works wonders on sales. They need a sales guy now.

Not you Castle 😂

So Bob Smith?

Hi Bob, Why the multiple accounts? I don't get it.

Getting confused now. Is DrAnomoly the same as h2oooo and DrAl?