Member Info for Skwizz

Incidentally, I don't and pull up some negative posts when I don't believe they're accurate, justified, or supported by the facts we have available.
Carry on interpreting your own little dreams.
Not just us that see through you.
I see who you are now and what your new tactic to avoid banning is.
I expected it (because I would've done that too) but it still took me a while to spot.
WB again, 'fool'.

"Penguins, williams and Skwizz spin everything into a negative."

As opposed to someone who spins everything into some nutty fantasy?
Lolol.

https://uk.investing.com/news/commodities-news/oil-tumbles-6-as-iran-tv-says-revival-of-nuclear-deal-agreed-2736617

Warren Fluffitt

"All you here across the LSE forum are so called “investors” putting their life savings into AIM stocks and losing the lot."

LMAO!
Yeah, that's what everyone here did.
Not you though.
Because you're smart.

:'D

Oh, did you mean me?
Lololol.

You really abuse the term, Village Idiot.
Keep up, luv.

You called it!
;)

And yet our currently biggest ramper used it religiously to promote his views.
Lolol.
Hey Sandercon.
You so poor that this is the best of the rampers you can afford now?
Doesn't bode well for your next dilution.

"Skwizz lost a lot of money here buying @ 52 week highs."

Sorry to hear that ells.
I don't wish a loss on anyone.
Even the village idiot.

"Expert" lolol

Oooh!
Going up again, Fussalot.
Was 88% SELL last week.
How long before it's high enough you go back to posting it every day again?

Has it ever been profitable?

Before Nutter Fussalot copies and posts it....

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Baghdad-In-Crisis-As-Protesters-Storm-Presidential-Palace.html

Like the MailOnLine favouring Fussalot.

Oh wait.
Sorry that should just read, it's nuts.

"Respected figure".., my hole!
Lololol

"which it says would produce millions of tons of oil over 25 years"

I believe the actual phrase your leader used was "Based on what we've found here, we're looking at between 50 and 100 billion barrels of oil in place in the ground".
Before quickly backtracking, then denying he'd said anything of the sort, finally refusing to comment ever since the BBC ran with that and dug up the video they'd recorded of him actually saying it (albeit quoting Lenigas who claimed it first, when he was looking to find a way out of UKOG).
ROFL!!!
I do enjoy the witticisms found on this board.

Enjoy:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2h2kWmf5iA

The Dorking Dribble is probably closest to being in a position to start commercial production (that is still a way off, even without the Fitch).
I don't believe they'll stop it, but neither do they.
They just want to delay it as long as possible to try and scare investors/producers away.
That is their tactic on all the other projects as well.

"anything we can do to slow down this particular development and other developments is worth doing"

Just let that sink in for a moment, with all its' implications.
This lot are as nutty as Fussalot.
They'll drag this out for as long as they possibly can, seizing upon every opportunity.
Anyone who is still convinced that UKOG is going to start making a profit tomorrow, take note.

And again; UKOG is not fracking and has stated on numerous occasions that it has no need to frack and is not interested in fracking.
So why is this appearing once again on a UKOG forum?

Love how they have to tell you.
Like getting the last word in at the playground
Could they be any more immature?
:'D

I welcome anyone who wishes to filter me to do so asap.
I know mullins has, he told me!
Lololol