Member Info for Skelly85

Its hilarious how Jemesa says I'm always wrong and negative.

Then when I point out that HE is actually wrong, he disregard his original lies (in this case a bidding war) he says I'm the stupid one ask tells me I'm showing green flags on an opinion he originally said was negative.

And I'm the stupid one. Lol.

Lol,

Bringing religious beliefs into your decision making?

Very logical...

49% is a guarantee of nothing!

51% is a guarantee of whatever you want.

Jemesa,

I've been right almost every time I called you out.

Your more full of shight than anyone on this board.

If a third party comes in and offers EMH a value for their 49%, CEZ match it, game over.

No bidding war! Lies lies lies.

And finally, who on earth wants to buy a minority share of a company, when the partner who doesnt want them their is 70% owned by the government and that government write the rule book?

I cant think of many...

The three scenarios for EMH's 49%

CEZ exercises its deadlock buyout right. This is a contractual call option. CEZ notifies, market value gets determined (mechanism not public — likely independent expert), EMH shareholders vote. No third party can inject themselves. The only "competition" is EMH shareholders rejecting the price as inadequate, which is rejection, not a bid.

EMH decides to sell its 49% voluntarily. Here the SHA's transfer restrictions kick in. The terms aren't public, but a 51/49 JV of this type virtually always has either a ROFR or ROFO clause. With a ROFR, EMH would have to find a third-party buyer first, then offer CEZ the right to match. So in theory you could see something that looks like a bidding war — third party bids X, CEZ matches at X, third party comes back at X+1, etc. But ROFRs are specifically designed to prevent that. Most sophisticated third parties won't bother spending due diligence money knowing CEZ can just match at the end and walk away with the asset. I'm uncertain whether the SHA actually has a ROFR vs ROFO vs neither — the public disclosures don't specify.

CEZ and EMH negotiate a buyout bilaterally outside the deadlock mechanism. Pure private negotiation. A third party has zero role.

The locals do opposite the mine. Its the locals who rejected the processing plant, which is why it had to me moved.

City, you do realise that it wasnt me who started claims of a possible bidding war?

Dont see anyone saying you cant make unfounded fake claims if they portray a positive context...

Interesting MrCity that you said I need to provide documents for a Non Bidding, then say Bidding can happen, and provided zero documents to back that up.

Luckie claims KC wouldn't "work" for a decade for a low ball sale.

What he doesnt state is that KC has already spent that decade extracting 5 million in cash into his pockets from shareholders, and also accumated millions of shares for which he didnt pay a penny.

So even if he accepted 10p a share, he would be making a very handsome amount of money for a decades work.

All at retail investors expense.

There cant be a bidding war. More BS.

Read the takeover/first refusal terms.

If CEZ want Geomet, no third parties get a say.

Its funny how so many people think missing the JTF grant deadline means the JTF moves their deadlines.

Like dont you realise why they put these deadlines in place?

Have you no idea how many milestones and deadlines EMH have missed over the last decade?

This mine was supposed to have gone through all of this such a long time ago. The original milestone was to have this mine fully operational a year ago!

The JTF aren't in the habit of throwing money at people who repeatedly don't do waht they say. Otherwise they'd have lost all their money to fraudsters, cheats and incompetence.

No stringer,

The SP is completely lifeless because of my comments.

EMH and its leadership are the highest of quality you could hope for, and they've executed all their milestones with perfection.

If it wasnt for my comments, the sp would be well over 300% of the NPV value.

Holy shight,

Did Luckie just write a non AI slop chat?

EbRD selling out of EMH and buying back into Geomet once they've been kicked out the door.

I agree.

Jemesa is clearly deranged.

Monster, they dont need a low ball offer of 50 or 70p.

They get their bonus if the price goes over 30p, even if they dont meet any of the milestones.

Why should I start focusing on that more?

Because the thing I said would happen, and the rampers argued against, is now happening?

And as they try putting a positive spin on it now, it proves their comments have zero credibility?

Rampers say no dilution. It happened

Rampers say EBRD investment shows project is 100% guaranteed and they won't sell up. Theyre now selling up.

Rampers say EIA wont be delayed.

I say good luck with the Germans

Lol.

Luckies and Jemesas AIs are now falling apart contradicting each other's historical standpoints.

Love it.

Want an idea of what its like dealing with German bureaucracy? Watch this video. Did you know Germans are still heavily reliant on fax machines?

https://youtu.be/J-ka8NykO_g?is=1pWRTdQaC9DM8iCK