RE: While we wait.4 Mar 2021 21:15
For what its worth, the clarification from Coper was quite important.
When I first read the response with two "??" I wondered why put that in, when such an important question was being posed at a game changing moment in the companies history.
I did not understand that the said Cathy was externally employed - at a good salary [I had assumed she was part of Arts family group]
It concerned me greatly that the response would contain two question marks.
To my great relief, to now know that they were pretty informal emojis of a smiling face, has somewhat changed my opinion of that interaction with the PR company we handsomely employ.
And Coper thanks also for sharing the secondary communication, it adds weight to the first now considered positive reply.
TBH up until CC's challenge, and Copers reply I was having some doubts, and who can blame me given the historic unfortunateness of the company.
Now I am back to where I was before reading the initial response. To the extent that I will add further to my holdings in the morning.
You have to give credit to Caw Caw, he is a balance to some of the more rampier posters on here.
All entitled to post what they do, but its good to have a view from the other side.
And Tilbun, well you are ace at succinctly putting the commercials together.
Hats off to you.
Good luck to all.
DFIU.