Member Info for Shedulike

Thanks Yammers, timely evidence of my non-ramper credentials! (though I was being slightly tongue in cheek).

Well I didn't filter you as it turns out as I really try not to on principal. I have filtered three people over the years, two for being absolute nutters and one just for persistent unpleasantness. Hackss there is a massive difference in tone in your last post to the previous ones which I didn't think were reasonable. From your last contribution you sound like someone I can talk to in a constructive way. I asked LR about certain allegations about the mets report and he gave a detailed reply about the legal processes in getting the RNS out. We all know about the NOMAD but I didn't know that WA also scrutinise RNS's relating to their work and sign them off. They just wouldn't tolerate any shenanigans with their independent work as it would undermine their reputation, so that one's a non-starter.

Bricks they are never going to respond to analysis, I've lost count how many times I've referred people to MC's comment on the silver giving us "funding optionality" but they're not going to dig out the interview because they're not interested in coming to an informed decision about EUZ.

I resisted mentioning "If your", but "looses money", there does seem to be a theme.

The reassuring thing is they can't resist going way too far in their deramping to be credible. A very, very rare filter for me also.

10BT obviously a multitude of reasons why we're in a completely different situation but perhaps the 'biggy' to distance us from the SXX situation is that our enormous resource can be recovered with a low capex project.

Will be interesting to see what will be the next news, resumption of drilling I don't think needs to be RNS'd so perhaps a LinkdIn with some pics of everyone looking highly professional and generally like the type of drilling team certain to find high-grade mineralisation would suffice. Second phase locked cycle for zinc could be soon if MC comments are to be taken at face value. Maybe a new joint broker or at least new coverage from TP? Come to think of it if we are positioned on the cusp of the endgame as we all hope, could a new joint broker be an unnecessary expense?

Curious that so many of the posters taking such a keen interest in EUZ yesterday didn't seem quite so interested today? Absolutely nothing has changed so surely their critique is just as valid and yet nothing. I suppose some sold out and now have no interest in the company but it does make you wonder if others are just gloaters who go wherever there's some turmoil to twist the knife. I guess they do it on down days because they know the trolling will have a more emotional impact - there are some strange people out there.

Someone who doesn't know the difference between 'to' and 'too', yikes!

Put me down for 0.072 Yamsel :)

I've genuinely always been colour blind, but I think my condition must be getting worse.

DJ a long time ago LR said something to me along the lines that the worst way to get a good deal through is to put up the for sale sign. They have to position themselves so that different paths remain possible, going back to MC comment about the silver giving us funding "optionality", I think that is partly a message to potential buyers that we might look at JV or offtake arrangements. Finally, someone else mentioned concerns that with the SP in the doldrums we may get a daft offer, for all we know we've had daft offers but it doesn't matter the board don't have to put them to shareholders. I think things will remain cloak and dagger until a clear credible and attractive course of action whether JV or sale is proposed to the Exec's, only then will it be recommended to shareholders and due diligence will start.

Yep fair enough BB, I just got frustrated yesterday when perfectly sensible arguments just weren't getting a look in amongst the despair at the SP. I still maintain though that many of the negative comments yesterday were disingenuous posters not just from p****d off genuine holders.

Perhaps devious but clumsy, posting history does shine a torch on people's credibility. Believe it or not, I do sympathise the SP does do things to your judgement and wears you down. Maybe a bit late today already..... but shall we try and keep it civil today? I'll start by offering an olive branch to BB.

SteveE60 on 29th Dec "Keep it simple EUA. KEFi .EUZ top 3 2020 picks". Could you explain what has happened since then for you to now be saying "I wouldn't want anyone new to be lulled in"?? You really are one of the most untrustworthy posters Steve.

I don't expect you to sell up just because you're p*****d but because you have no faith in the Exec's and expect another dilution in the near future. To hold with the analysis you continually express must be the definition of madness. I'm not afraid of what I apparently wish for one bit and I thoroughly recommend that everyone who has completely lost confidence does sell up if nothing else, for the sake of their own sanity. To be frank I've seen enough tit-for-tat exchanges on these boards over the years to know that they go absolutely nowhere, simply escalate and I've always avoided them until now. I believe my posts are balanced and even tonight I've referenced the project risks and global headwinds that could yet scupper us. I'm taking a risk remaining invested but I do have confidence in LR & MC to do get us over the line, if I didn't I would be out, you have an almost pathological obsession with the mistakes of the past and you're nowhere nearer explaining your raison d'être for leaving one penny of cash in this company. That's it from me tonight.

I agree Newbie absolutely every right to be p*****d off, I don't blame BB for that one bit. I just don't understand the point in hanging around running the company down when we have achieved so much on the ground in the last year. I can't explain why the mcap isn't reflecting the asset other than the sentiment crushing equity raises. One thing I can say for certain is that if we had seen exactly the same operational performance in the last eight months but the SP was in a better place you wouldn't hear a fraction of the moaning. I'm very down about the SP but believe we're positioned to monetise the work programme in the near future, that's why I'm still invested. If I shared BB's opinions I'd have run a mile long ago so I'm within my rights to point out the incongruity of BB's position. Sounds like BB invested over five years too early from not understanding the mine development cycle, I invested just over two years too early from not understanding the mine development cycle so perhaps I'm just that bit less p****d off :)

BB nobody has said that everyone posting negatively is trying to get the SP down (from MFM's post "some panic sellers but there's also been some with a definite agenda imho"). To be honest, with the opinions you regularly express about EUZ / FCR's past performance and the prospects you forsee for EUZ in the near future it does seem to be an anomaly that you retain any investment at all.

Yeah well said MFM - it's obvious that amongst the very negative posters there are a range of motivations from just finding catharsis in expressing despair to cynically trying to depress sentiment and the SP further. Interesting what you said about not understanding the mining exploration to development cycle when you invested - ring a bell anyone? Well my ears are certainly going ding dong!! When any LTH invested years ago we thought we were at the bottom of a steadily increasing mcap but it's turned out to be a lot more complicated than that. The good news is we're on the home straight with a just a couple of metallurgical hurdles to get over, the prospect of banking some more indicated and then it gets interesting. There is still some risk both micro and macro but we're so close now the mcap is utterly insane.

I don’t think you are Shardster - announcing that when you claim to have not finished selling makes no sense at all. We’ve also seen a few personality changes recently which is probably sadder .