Member Info for share4

Sean his motivation is to try to get a better entry point, he did this before. Then he ramped them saying they were going to 10p when he wanted to exit.

Added more this morning, great investment imo.

Is the clown trying to justify themselves again. All I see on here is filtered post after filtered post. The tool doesn't even realise posting about a stock going to 10p then selling the next week is ramping.

Exp is going on filter now. Some people think he is just bringing some reality to help everyone else out and there is something valuable in what they're bringing to the board.

I just think they're clearly unscrupulous and will say anything relevant to their own position which makes anything that they say unreliable trash. As Eyeguy has stated you can make your own minds up from the following comments:

[Has no position]
"Below 1p soon enough"
"Getting planning permission in place wont affect the sp whatsoever "

[Has a position]
"This will be 10p+ by the end of May, once Planning Permission is secured. Having PP in place adds a significant amount of value to the company as the approval will be considered as an asset to the business."

There's no logical reason BA and Shell would have got this far on a project they thought wouldn't work. I'm sure many people with knowledge of complex petrochemical infrastructure have filled in gaps a self appointed expert on here can't comprehend.

Nothing wrong with a dose of realism/

Everything wrong with mixing up that realism with "stock going to 10p by end of May" then promptly selling and going back to the negativity.

Yes we're all well acquainted with your opinion exprt as you've made the same post several times day for at least the last 6 months with a brief interlude of telling us the share price will go to 10p.

How about a day off? You can get in a car to go test your eyesight or something.

what is your trading strategy? watch a single stock day in day out then buy when it doubles in price

exprat, last time you were waiting for a buy signal, the stock doubled

to be clear PP had no bearing on your decision, the only reason you bought was because it was going up rapidly and you freaked out. if you made a logical decision to buy ahead of PP you wouldn't have told us you were sitting on the sidelines and waited a whole month to get your money in.

exp are you still pushing this nonsense that you bought ahead of PP. you didn't even understand my post.
many of us were buying ahead of PP at 1.4p when you were trashing the stock.
feel free to explain what changed between 1.4p and 2.5p to make you buy. all that happened was the share price went up. you are rewriting your own history to suggest you didn't just throw some money in because you thought you had missed the boat.
no doubt at 6p you'll do it again

A point I made last year was that there was massive momentum in climate change which meant that all bets were off as far as how this company gets investment goes compared to what's gone before.

Exp now tries to present Covid as negative. If I'm an airline and people are questioning why they're using airlines I'm going to have to invest a significant amount of resources in rebuilding consumer trust and get the government to contribute towards it.

There was no news when you bought in you fool, it was the same "uninvestable garbage" you claimed it was only almost twice as expensive and moving rapidly.

Just in case you're not clear on what you actually said

"Until I see something positive and realistic to bet on, I'll be on the sidelines. All I see is marketing and PR; the banks see right through it. When material progress arrives, and the project goes from 'puntable' to 'investable', I'll be in."

No exp. If anyone wants to read your posts it's around page 100. You made several posts a day saying it was a terrible investment around 1.3-1.5p when some of us were buying in. You did not say it was a good opportunity. Nothing happened between then and 2.5p when you panicked on missing the boat and bought in.

Yeah sure, poor investment, 300-400% in 3 months.

You seem to think you are an expert, you may have industry knowledge but are a transparent novice investor. You were trying to talk it down to below 1p in november and missed the boat, now you are talking it down again because you have sold out and gotten it wrong.

You didn't punt on PP expb, you panic bought when it started spiking. If you were punting on PP you would have bought at 1.3-1.5p, not on a spike around 2.5p.

Glossing over? Last time you claimed this stock was going under, you conveniently forgot to mention that you were simultaneously expecting a 300% near term return on investment.

You panic bought on the spike and got lucky. You don't even believe your own crap.

Your basic opinion was that it would go to 10p after PP.
Now you are out of the stock your basic opinion is that it will go under soon.

I see you've gone back to hyper bearish, same as before you bought in. Last time this company was going under you bought in when it began spiking.

You do this when you don't own the stock, I think you are just trying to convince yourself of your decision under the guise of harsh truths and reality checks for so called uninformed investors.

eyeguy - i think we got off on the wrong foot, every share we've both been on since then has done very well and have a lot of respect for your abilities to spot a share.