Haha, Willu17.
Laughing with you, NOT at you.
My story is not dis-similar.
Bought 3 tranches in quick succession last July/August, at 45p, then 36p, then 32p.
Rode it up to 124p, where i top-sliced.
Then i sat and waited for 150p to top-slice again.
Rest is history......
But, i also bought further on the way down.
Sat with an average of 44p now.
However like you, i feel it will come good, just taking much longer than i anticipated.
Haha Bellers. Quite right.
I'm uncomfortable with the 'mates rates' approach by SD.
But, he's all about the II's, not us little PI's.
I'm just chuffed i topped up at 14.30, yesterday.
Always nice to beat a placing.
It is a little disconcerting.
I've no issue with it, IF they had told us they were effectively using real-time.
Prices obviously concluded at 16.30 and not 16.45.
I can live with either way, so long as we know.
That headline explains why the decision will be some time before it is released.
The decision itself is probably quite straight forward.
However, since the legal profession will have this as 'setting a precedent', then the judge has to be very careful with wording and implication (implied or accidental).
I reckon we are looking at 1st quarter, next year!!
Yes, i realised Edward.
I was attempting some humour back.
But, it doesn't always travel in the stark written word.
My use of BP....
Well, it certainly isn't blxxdy predictable.
Since BP and many others shares are fair from predictable.
BP seems in a happy place currently, but the dividend reduction has held it back, i suspect.
Morning Rox,
Good to hear from you.
Was it the JTMac (god bless him) link from AML that got you here?
AML board is nothing like it was 18 months ago.
I'm still on the SAGA, saga. Mind you, it's not going to compete with the goings-on/drama/fiasco here!!
Have you bought your crymbo cards from you know where!!
Thanks for posting.
An interesting, informative, impassionate presentation.
Although the author is not strictly impartial (he acknowledges he holds shares), it is very evenly balanced.
Well, worth a listen.
Thank you.
I'm totally on your wavelength. Tig.
My logic tells me SD isn't interested in or wants PI's.
He's only interested in II's.
From memory he made noises that way, when he first appeared, and also signed up another broker that is geared to institutions.
He probably had y'day all teed (pun intended!!) and late on some-one said 'Hey, Shaun what about the PI's?'
Oh xxxx, said Shaun, do we have to....
Oh just bung them PB's way, with insufficient time to do anything, even if they can work the PB site.
On a more serious note, I've not seen anything from SD that aligns to PI's, since he came on board.
Yes, i am a cynic, but...................
Never have i seen the word decline used so often in what is meant to be a CEO announcement.
Results are shockingly poor.
Market will have a field day, get your sick bucket ready.
I predict a SP decline. Must be the CEO's word of the year.
Terrible.
That is a far more accurately reflective post, Mac.
If you read your final paragraph (stage 8), it confirms offer and acceptance still has to occur, albeit possibly imminently.
It states the facts as they are.
Thank you for the reminder.