Member Info for Seanxoxox

@Droverman - way to lose an argument, man :)

Here's a joke - what do you call a w⚓︎ who is also someone who posts on the Lloyds message board?

Someone who posts on the Lloyds message board.

I know its subtle... you guys just got think about it... ;)

Don't see how anyone can make short-medium term price predictions with current macro environment. If people have patience though, I imagine anyone investing in low 20s will do just fine.

And just a fortnight ago he was Jesus.. .https://theconversation.com/was-trumps-so-called-jesus-image-blasphemy-a-religious-expert-explains-280603 I guess DT really has lost his mind, but you have to wonder why there's nobody around him saying, 'hey, Donald, let's think about this...'

Wow! Truly astonishing. I've not looked in here for a couple of years - and that weird obssessive is still here, still posting about his red flags. - Anyway, price action after the announcement of the contract is deeply disappointing for LTHs, but when the dust settles I think investors will start to remember why it's such a positive development. Bad news is - looks like you'll never be rid of STT ;)

@Pokerchips

he has given those Iranians a lesson... execute protestors and fund proxy Terrorists and you wont live to tell the tale...

You are a silly man aren't you... what do you think Trump's goons were doing in Minneapolis if they weren't executing protestors. If only you had as many brain cells as you have posts then maybe you'd only be half as stupid ;)

no, mate, you're not. do a little research? https://*********************/shortinteresttracker

:)

I don't think FP is short here though. I think he's just a little bit confused.

@Pedro re: fuel price. Isn't a concern at least for the foreseeable future. Group hedges exposure to fuel price - 'At 31 December 2024, the Group is around 98% hedged for 2025 at an average price of 51.8p per litre; around 52% hedged for 2026 at an average price of 47.0 per litre; and around 13% hedged for 2027 at an average price of 44.6p per litre.'

With all the talk about a potential offer, seems like the significance of this acquisition has been largely overlooked.

'For the financial year ended 31 August 2024 Empower reports unaudited revenue of £10.1 million and profit before tax of £1.8 million.' GOOD paid an initial consideration of £7 million.

GOOD is in a GOOD place right now... Growing through acquisitions and providing services that will become ever more important over the coming years. Personally, I would be quite happy for the Esyasoft offer to fall through, as I think there is lots more to come from this company.

Not really a pump if they've sold assets to a value greater than current mkt cap. Is it?

Er, see above where it says RNS? Jeez

Isn't this simply because the smaller cap indices experienced stronger post-pandemic rallies? The FTSE100 took an age to reach pre-pandemic highs and has struggled to sustain them since. It lagged the smaller caps on the way up, so it was never going to experience such a jolt on the way down. That's my theory, anyhow.

https:// audio boom.com/posts/7876424-paul-hill-on-stocks-to-watch-including-trellus-belluscura-avacta

Very good post Sharegar.

Bizzare, isn't it, that VAST now has a producing copper mine, copper is it at - what? - 10 year highs and VAST is sitting at multi-year lows. I think if we do pay Atlas, rather than having them convert, sentiment could change fairly rapidly. And I don't understand why we wouldn't. There is substantial cash from the last placing and we're being paid (monthly?) by Mercuria.

Time for VAST to act like a proper grown-up company. Growth should be from profit rather than from endlessly tapping the market.

Hi HT - It's interesting that you think production can be ramped up for the US without significant cost. I wonder what IMMO's plans are for marketing the product.
Good idea, btw - I'm thinking of buying one for a younger relative's birthday. If I do so, I will certainly share the order number. Thanks for the input.
S.

Thanks Stalin - interesting stuff.
It certainly seems like an exciting stage of the (potential) journey. I tried to find out how many individuals there are in the age group 5-15 in the US and UK. I came up with the figure 58 million. So when you imagine selling to just 1% - and then start thinking about Europe and Asia - it seems to add up to one hell of an opportunity.
ATB

Good afternoon both,
What are your thoughts on the potential for LEO? Ian Hetherington's appointment in December seems a very bullish sign. In an interview he did with Proactive he compared the current situation to the early developmental stages of Sony Playstation. LEO is a distinctive product that has had excellent reviews and the target market is huge (basically anyone from age 5-15). Perhaps it will ultimately be too large for IMMO? Wd be interested to hear your thoughts.
Sean

Great news however there are far to many ‘shoulds’ in the RNS.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Difficult to fathom this comment. There are literally no 'shoulds' at all.