Member Info for Sausageonstick

....the confirmed output this week or for me it's heading south again. If they can't confirm output increased how are they going to get to 10,000 by the end of the year?

Come on Rufus, Jeff and Tim at what point do you actually start listening to shareholders and communicate on a regular basis?? The market desperately needs to know you can fill these contract otherwise they are worthless. How long does it take to commission a piece of tech you've added to the crusher take???? If not confirmed by end of first week of November, can only see this falling further. Remember they stated ambition of 10,000 tonnes a month by year end. Its almost November and as far as we officially know they can't produce 8000 a month yet.

Bonkers, up or down, just make a market once you've got the wets in, please.

At 0.2p or below?????

...of buys coming in to support this. Certainly has a feel of a placement announcement in the wings. I guess we may know in the next 48 hours why the drop????

When Edenville confirm they have the required output. Technology was supposed to be in by end of September, I know it needs commissioning, but we are closed to the end of October and still no confirmation. Is it another Rufus attempt to over promise and under deliver? What little confidence I had in Rufus is now ebbing away.

...to 0.2p unless Edenville issue RNS giving confidence back to the market. I said it days ago, and there still remains very little confidence in what Edenville are doing unless they confirm they can fill the orders signed for.

....without confirmation of increased output levels of coal, specifically at least 8,000 tonnes a month which is needed to satisfy the orders signed, this is only heading one way.

Need the technology installed, commissioned and making a difference now. Remember, they have stated 10,000 tonnes a month by the end of the year.

People need to email Jeff to push for output confirmation RNS. My email has gone into him.

...coming together

....invitation for qualification (ifq) documents from tanesco.

Into Google, them open the Velmalaw .co .tz pdf URL, interesting read

...nervous just before output increase is hopefully confirmed, sneaky.

From red to blue pretty quick

.....0.24p we could easily see 0.2p as investors stop losses are triggered.

We need those output figures confirming at least 8,000 tonnes a month Tim, I know you read this board but it now imperative that increased output is confirmed.

One way or another

........know that the technology has been installed, commissioned and confirm out our has increased to a stated level. So if it's 8000 tonnes a month state that output is confirmed as 8000 tonnes

Sorry, 15 minute delayed

...... continues, all blue so far on my 25 minute delayed screen

Just to reduce the number of shares and circulation

......would Edenville start buying back shares? Or consolidate?

........as I see it, although Edenville announced contracts they added the sucker punch of "The upgrades currently being undertaken....."

So the upgrades are still taking place and Edenville NEED to CONFIRM to the market that they have finished and that output HAS INCREASED. With out this confirmation on output the market is still left scratching its head as to whether Edenville is in the position to fulfill these great contracted orders.

I implore Tim (who, I'm led to believe, has this bulletin board on his screen) as the PR man to make it crystal clear to both Jeff and Rufus the importance, the necessity of issuing a RNS the moment the tech is in place and increasing output. Edenville also stated 10,000 tonnes output by year end, it would be good to know as part of the same RNS if Edenville are on schedule to meet this target (it has failed to meet it one before) The tech was supposed to be in and running by end of September wasn't it?

Come on Tim, Jeff, Rufus confirm Edenville are a actually producing at least 8000 tonnes a month and this will be away