RE: Warning - Try Harder4 Jun 2025 09:49
Last try
1. SLE is worthless because the price showing on its LSE chat board shows a 0.00 price (Your least relevant boner tbf, but still my personal favourite for its delicious combination of a novice's error and spectacularly unearned confidence);
2. there's no government bond at SLE's disposal;
3. an immediate declaration on the day of the news that San Leon was the guilty party in the TRAM lawsuit;
4. immediately upon arrival on this board, credulously signal-boosting both a r**ist poster's hateful rhetoric as 'useful information', as well as more recently, the propaganda of two highly suspicious posters (who were both discredited soon after) who appeared suddenly for the first time here during the TRAM affair/lawsuit, to such an outrageous extent as to raise (further) doubts about your own legitimacy;
5. declaring (nay, screaming!!) that any end to the TRAM lawsuit that doesn't involve a court forcing TRAM to deliver the $50m of shares to sle is tantamount to THE END OF SAN LEON!!! ('...This legal action signals the end of negotiations, and therefore, no deal, no money, no San Leon Energy...' Thought we'd forgotten that little gem, huh? I didn't);
6. the distribution of general misinformation on matters ranging from the government bond assigned to the Company, to the mangling of the recent legal details of the long-running dispute between fanning and a loan company, in yet another apparent attempt to make him or the company appear the more guilty party, while conveniently ignoring the fact that, from the jump, the case was entirely a personal one for fanning and has nothing at all to do with San Leon's business prospects and was IN FACT a transaction designed to allow fanning to purchase a significant stake in the company, as clear and profound a shareholder-friendly action that any CEO can take, another fact you conveniently ignored;
and 7. just being a noxious little toad who exploits the legitimate anger of long-suffering shareholders here in service of your own self-aggrandisement and often bruised ego (I'm not nearly as evangelical about whether or not a poster is a legit shareholder or not. In the end, its impossible to prove - or disprove - and most opinions, whether positive or negative, are welcome as long as they are adequately contextualised (unless the poster is r**ist of course. Then they should be condemned by others, unless those others are ethically compromised like you or a coward like blackswan). However, in your case,