Member Info for Salinger

So if anyone was to deliver early on a project after giving an estimate, which obviously happens regularly in the world of business, then it cannot be a “law” at all can it Mr genius?

Let’s call it guidance, which as we know can be ignored.

I do wonder why a self-proclaimed genius like McShaggis comes on an LSE board to mingle with the riff raff.
We clearly don’t do what we’re told AND we answer back. Poor Haggis.

Obviously those of us waiting over 10 years for a signature have got it all wrong. We should all sit back and relax, does it really matters if they sign, what will be will be?

The world according to the Pied Piper! More superior rubbish.

No, not Brookie, try Indigo and you won’t be far off.

Haggis in wonderland, don’t believe a word of it. He’s never volunteered personal info in the past as many long term holders will attest. “Brian100000” is a well known Pied Piper. Don’t be surprised if this post disappears, he doesn’t like being outed.

You miss the point Skelton, which is, why you felt the need to tell us your worries immediately on selling your stock? Nobody asked you, and I doubt anyone cares.
Do as you wish behind your keyboard as many do, trading or shorting, but when they/you come on and share your “concerns” it usually means one thing.

I think we both know I’m right. Oh and by the way, I’ve no intention scrolling through your history, I know all I need to from your recent offerings.

“ Left enough in so if my negativity is misplaced I will still be happy but once again my qfi holding is not large enough that it can hurt my PF. ”

Funny how those who’ve just sold feel the need to come on the boards and tell us about it, point out their worries and the negatives as they see it. Such thoughtful and helpful souls.

If I didn’t know better, I’d think you were a trader who’s just made his bet and rolled the dice. No, can’t be, surely!

“ Salinger....Oh and don’t hide behind the “if they don’t deceiver” get out.

“I will use google translate for that sentence.”

No need HF14, it was a misspelling of your own comment, if they don’t “deliver”. I know even you are not that dumb you couldn’t work it out.

Interesting that was the part of my post you found needed challenging. Assume you agree with the rest, which is fair enough.

HF14. Don’t you think every holder knows the history of QFI, I mean you don’t have a monopoly on memory. We know. You didn’t even give them the month to deliver before you questioned Jasons credibility. Oh and don’t hide behind the “if they don’t deceiver” get out.

They may fail, any shareholder with a pulse knows that, and their history is well known. If you have such little faith in the management and their prospects it’s a tad surprising you stay with it, why bother? Give them the space they asked for and if they fail then so be it but save us the running BS mind numbing commentary.

HF14, what will you complain about if/when QFI deliver? Or will you be one of those “I told you they’d come through” types?

Except April isn’t over yet, is it? I’m sure any update will be to the market at this stage and not a PI email.

Exactly, so why is credibility on the line come Friday at 5pm? Questions to answer for sure, an update I hope, but nobody knows how close things are other than QFI so probably best wait to hear from them.

And some doing their best to encourage it, it seems.

You can claim that trade too Miss Rouge, but hurry before RampyMcRampface beats you to it!

Whilst MSC and Morocco may have a common fuel supplier, the nature of each trial means they require different products entirely. Also, the detail of each deal between QFI and MSC/Morocco will be confidential between QFI and the individual company.

So whilst it’s a nice thought having it all tied up in one RNS, in reality there’s little to zero chance that will happen. It will be separate RNS if it happens at all.

“ it damages your credibility both as a person and for any opinions you offer”

Yeah, he lost that when he claimed to be a vulnerable woman, accused posters here of being a r.apist, a p.aedophile and being fat. Credibility bus left some time ago.

You Senor!

No doubt another of your phantom buys!

Aramco backed off due to an internal dispute with SEC over unpaid fuel bills (at least that’s what we were told). Yes, a nut job from this board did contact the refinery as I recall, embarrassing and unhelpful but didn’t impact the outcome as far as is known.

That’s right, we all hold “free shares” in QFI, that’s what makes this investment stress free. For above read “pump and dump” trading.