Member Info for sahid

Reincarnation complete?

If you look at LSE rules there is nothing to say that members cannot have multiple aliases. As to whether it is common I don’t know but I have suspected it many times. I also remember several contentious posters removed one of whom was the legendary Bolgas.
Most posters on this board appear genuine and helpful. We are all in the same boat concerning the Redt days but it does no good looking backwards. IES’s record in less than a year and during a major epidemic is nothing short of remarkable in my opinion and as the recovery in the worlds GDP begins we will be in a very different place a year from now. Whether it continues to be a positive board depends on whether the disappearances are permanent or whether they are reincarnated.

I think it possible they were one and the same. I assume that if LSE ban anyone they block the IP address which would work unless through a VPN. They always appeared around the same time and always with an off the wall viewpoint on any news the Company put out.

The appointment of Amelia Murillo as a Non Exec but currently a VP at a Management Consultant Company and Treasurer at Carlisle Interconnect Technologies poses quite a few questions.
Carlisle address the high end Mil/Aerospace markets with interconnect products and would appear to be a perfect merger target if Volex were looking. Sale, purchase or merger an excellent way to carry out due diligence?

Thank you yellowf1 for pointing out my error. The point I was making is that the large Red orders promised did not happen. We do not receive promises from IES only the orders.

IMHO it will double and more. Once REDt got to 5p (£2.50 IES equivalent) it went to 16p? very quickly based on several fairy stories about a European phase balancing order from a company with no money and very little experience and a few possible orders from water utilities none of which happened.
The big difference between Red and IES is Red talked and talked and talked and didn't deliver. IES delivers and doesn't talk until it delivers the orders.

Thanks for posting. I thought that a decision on Cleave Hill storage had been made in favour of Lithium but apparently not according to the article. Maybe the warnings on Lithium stability are starting to worry some developers.

Exactly as written in my post - IN 2030
If you are a registered shareholder it should have been emailed to you today. If not it’s on the IES website

Nice update today from Larry Z.
So it's now in writing $3Billion revenue expectation for IES in 2030.

Thanks BBD.

My allocation shows as an extra line in my portfolio at iii. Apart from the allocated quantity there is no other info there or in the notifications/ corporate actions or request for approving/ turning down the shares.
We have until 21/12? I think so am expecting news soon.

Kracken: Larry Zulch recently said that his target was to have 10% of the renewables market by 2030 so your post might well come to pass. I invested very early in the life of most of the major millennial technology companies and at times became very despondent as the so chart looked very much like a game of snakes and ladders. Look at the share charts of these companies since inception. The initial surge as the technology is presented followed by the inevitable fall once traction fails to appear and despondency sets in. Take a year or so out then BOOOOOM as the new technologies are accepted as they become better understood. Remember the early days of REDt? The sp rocketed only to fall back as the orders failed to materialise. A couple of years on the market better understands the technology and the benefit over competing technologies. My opinion is we will rise quickly to £5 on more order announcements. As Larry Zulch said IES don’t talk about orders until they are placed, a much better philosophy than Redt.

Yes it is true PF. If you can direct me to the AIM rule that says otherwise I will be happy to bow to your superior knowledge.

Just to correct you PotentForce. Posting as an insider is not illegal - posting inside info is illegal!

Yes very strange not only the timing but the cost of the trade is more expensive than any profit which will be made on such a small quantity. Any conspiracy theorists will tell you that a 1 share trade precedes an RNS and other low volume trades have other positive or negative messages but either way very strange indeed.

I am well underwater having bought Redt from 5 - 15p averaging out at 8p.
At that time the market cap was far far higher than it is today, with hardly any concrete opportunities, so would not be at all surprised to see this rapidly climb to £5 with a few more positive announcements.

Having just listened to the investor presentation it is easy to agree. One very good acquisition (DEKA) a leading power cord manufacturer and 3 other serious acquisitions in the pipeline.

Thanks guys, that’s impressive but realistic in my opinion. I believe that the year end expectation has been factored into the current price but all eyes on next years numbers when the results are out next week. I wonder if the BOD is considering a full listing as opposed to AIM? Given their history of making first class acquisitions they could become of interest to more institutions who only invest in the Official List.

Thanks John.
Did they give any indication of a future target price?

The juggernaut that is VOLEX rumbles on!!!