RE: The past, the now, the future24 Apr 2021 10:24
Starchild
“Persons who had NO shares contributed to the problem by bombarding negativity 24x7 on BBs. Current and potential investors do read BBs because small AIM companies have little mainstream media coverage. BBs are goldfish bowls of market sentiment. A few posters who had NO shares and for unknown reasons allegedly DESPISE BPC posted negativity 7 days a week. This certainly contributed to the SP not exceeding 0.8p. Had it done so, Bizzell would have been more inclined to continue funding at the 0.8p level.”
You are saying that those of us whose take on BPC’s financial position was more accurate than the scenarios that you, Tiburn etc. were painting (of us all, it turns out that Bohemia was closest to the mark) are to blame because we did not leave your scenarios unquestioned.
First of all, that really exaggerates the power and significance of BBs and underestimates the role of the market. The market clearly had its own take on BPC in the wake of Perseverance and once the existence, though not the full extent, of the funding issues became apparent (some time ago now), 0.8p+ was arguably always out of the question.
Secondly though, it is just a really strange argument to run. If we had been wrong and you had been right and our posts had actually had the kind of traction that you imagine they did, you might have a point. But you are left saying, in effect, that BPC’s last best hope lay in allowing an inaccurate narrative to flourish unchallenged.
Anyway, it will take time for the dust to settle here and I don’t feel that BPC will present any kind of opportunity until it does, so you will not be seeing me here again until June at the earliest.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
