Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
I was wondering if ava6k is proven to have much reduced toxicity and little in the way of side effects, would this lead to a reduction in the criteria for inclusion in the trials, therefore resulting in a larger patient pool ?
I'm also staying in, backs against the wall and all that, just hope the wall is 67p
I have been thinking of the patients who have been taking part in the trials.
They must have been quite ill when the study started in early august. Now over six months later they are to be given an increased dose of ava6k , so presumably they are fit enough to continue. I have had a few friends die of cancer and on a couple of occasions once diagnosed they did not last 6months. Makes me think that ava6k must be working ,to some extent anyway.
Also would/will we be told if any of the patients unfortunately succumb, ?
Anyone with knowledge of such trials ? i would be interested to know
RS
He may a rat ,but he is our rat.
Rippley, doh,matt , stop calling Peto by another name , it makes you seem stooopid, if you think that's the best way to expose him as unfit for his roll, well your just a jobby
Peto rather shot himself in the foot by stating it can take 2,3,4,5 yrs to create a test well how come the Tiddly Winks managed it in months, ( old tech and not much good) but it didnt take them 5 yrs!
Many thanks to all the diggers, delvers, searchers ,investigators, fact finders, kept me holding tight in the times of weakness,
(mine) The great contributors make the bb a source real info .
Unfortunately I cant really add to the technical knowledge re avct, but you never know, my next door neighbour is top guy re pancreatic cancer, he knows of avacta, cos I told him So perhaps one day I can add something of worth.
awra best Avactarians.
Maybe at some point , lft's may have to state on the packaging S & S , surely all medical devices have to state what they can achieve,
Certain posters on here believe ( incorrectly in my view) that with lft's it will be all about price.
As with most things in life how things are valued........ its mostly about performance.
My pal had people round to his gaff last Sat, on the Mon one of the women tested +ve, he had a Gov supplied lft three days in a row, all -ve . He picked me up in his car on the Fri, 50min drive to the GC, felt unwell sat and had a PCR test +ve. I was out Fri nt and Sat nt unaware of the situation. I had my PCR test yesterday fortunately -ve. No wonder the cases are rising fast.
The FDA were quite right to advise "throw them in the trash" yet HMG are perfectly happy for this nonsense with chinese krap to continue. Dearie me.
On an different tack the St Andrews depot for ordering home use PCR tests has run out, why would that be then ? worrying
It seems that the Market has decided that avcts lft's are not going to be a major player. many naysayers on this BB seem to agree.
To discount Mahmud Katami as a player in the LFT market is to ignore someone who's business has invested 20m£ in the project.
My pal met with him in his capacity as a loss adjuster, said he was an arrogant loud mouthed bully,
The Roofereen is involved in food manufacturing , and deals with Indians constantly ( you would be quite surprised how many indian companies are in the food business) , if they make an investment you can be damned sure they will try their hardest to get their money back, with considerable interest.
Medusa 19 have invested because they see it as a profitable venture, Kamani will not see £20m go down the pan.
Indians hat to lose face with their peers, Medusa will make a fist of it.
GL believers.
Seems to me that the"market" now appears to view Avacta as a Cancer play with a bit of diagnostics stuck on, as apposed to the reverse view which has been prevelent for the last 16mths.
Noticed Paul mentioned that the broker valued diagnostics at a mere 50p, of their 280p valuation,
If so then surely low sales volume of Affidx is priced in,
Just the way it now seems to me,
Expect I am wrong.