Member Info for RichTheNewbie

barwick - you're right about needing proper news......but you spoilt it by referencing the 675% as a good bit. As mentioned in the previous post(s), that's just a really silly figure they put in the RNS, probably to fool gullible people into thinking it's amazing, as even a small rise above next to nothing is close to infinity percent!

zero=zero in the past

That's another silly hypey statement in the RNS.
The closer your revenue is to zero the higher the revenue increase you can claim with even a tiny rise.
Might as well have said the Factom revenue is infinity percent higher than not long ago......as that's basically what they're doing.

barwick - just realistic. You expected this didn't you? They'd been dropping hints for ages (basically telling you it would happen). The RNS is just stuffed full of terms platitudes like the china video market is massive etc rather than useful numbers. I know nothing more having read the RNS than yesterday. Do you?

In fact you probably had the mini-rise on Friday with leaky AIM and will be sold into today.

This has been expected for ages and changes very little.
Wouldn't expect anyone to buy on this news unless they'd not spent two minutes Googling the company.

had=has

Why do you always say things that are demonstrably untrue!?

"This is not a stock with a history of rapid upward movement either. So certainly not one to chase down."..........anyone just had to look at the share price graph to see spikes as even moderate buying pushes it up lots with the low free float.

I can only assume you're angling to buy more as cheaply as possible as your messages never make any sense otherwise and certainly don't reflect reality!

destitute do you ever post anything positive or are you just trying to scaremonger? Last time you were inventing sales that didn't even exist and now you're trying to say people should be worried about dilution when one of the best things about this company is that it dilutes incredibly rarely, and has already done a placing which should tide it over for a long time. The last small one before that being about three years ago!
If you're worried about dilution you should invest here and sell every other AIM company you hold because I'll bet virtually all of them will dilute more often than here!

(not just finalised - but sent it off to them)

That interview is very positive. They've finalised the data package for the potential big pharma partners they've been talking to all year and hope they'll have reviewed it by the end of the year. A deal could happen at any time now really. Wouldn't be impossible for one company to try to secure it ahead of the others by making an early offer.
To quote the CEO "A lot of big companys. A lot of interest."
Imo just a case of trying to accumulate as much as possible on these dips.

There's a gang of people like you on many an AIM stock doggo.
Obsessed with one stock, love to pretend they know more than everyone else, love to get gullible people to hang on their every word, usually continually ramping it whilst the share price is decimated. Usually claim they found some piece of info first. Hell, it's not unknown for companies to deliberately leak tidbits to punters, just to try keep the market interested when it's too soon to RNS it.
This "research" you're on about is totally worthless despite you thinking it's gold dust.

Joinedtherush - that's all fair enough. I would just bear in mind that much of the "research" is incredibly one-sided Googling and would be better termed "promotional material". I've always said there's potential in things like Factom but the incessant hype and attacking of anyone not ramping is just tiresome. Problem is there's a group of them who wish to hound anyone not promoting the stock off the board.

It's all very well saying there's been lots of good news Joinedtherush but there's yet to be anything particularly earth shattering which is why the price hasn't risen (as well as other investments being written off or looking ropey like Vogogo whose share price has been decimated). That's the fact of the matter.
I don't really know why people say there's "all the aphria money" to spend. I've seen someone say that before. You clearly don't read the RNSs as following that sale they made a series of investments to spend that money. The recent placing they paid back Lorne with leaving a portion left for a small investment potentially.
Things like Factom may well come good in the future but there's plenty of reasons for this not rising like many people say it will every day.

barwick - a real sign of strength is to not ignore any negatives, or things that aren't as positive, because you're confident in the stock. A real sign of weakness is behaving like you and the gang do. Juvenile name calling and attacking anything/anyone not positive 100% of the time. It's extremely common on these messageboards.

Oh you're a fully fledged disciple of the crew now I see.
You don't want the correct answer and prefer to just bury your head in the sand and attack people who speak the truth. Past few days more than ever has really highlighted the kind of foul-mouthed illiterate pondlife that infest this board trying to promote the stock.

Bid ticked down immediately afterwards (and most of the trades today and yesterday have been sells) so probably sells that have been being worked for a while (and continuing by the look of it).

I disagree about it being good info.
Sometimes it's misleading.
Often it's barely relevant.
Always incredibly rampy.
All of it anyone who had the slightest interest could just Google it all themselves.
I've seen it zillions of times before on AIM shares. Closed groups, incessant ramping with the more "research" the better, and very often a lot of money is lost by PIs.
I wouldn't be here if I didn't think there was some potential but the endless ramping by a relatively small group is the single worst thing about this share and people will get sucked in by the incessant overpromotion (which is why they do it).

No links about the global crypto rout?
Funny that.

The NOMAD system on AIM is a total joke and should be scrapped.
It's a laughable smokescreen for proper regulation of companies, instead handing it off to parties who are paid by the companies, which anyone could see is a bonkers conflict of interest.