Member Info for rhd1

Minnisage, I thought EUDAW concerned the warrants from their previous merger and nothing to do with the one we are interested in?

Harrycaul, spot on post!

I would like to think that most LTSH do the exact opposite of what the 'multiple identity poster' tells us and it is quite obvious that they are just day traders playing the market with no scruples at all.

Believe nothing they tell you, even emails purporting to come from others!

Porky was right and I for one am am glad that I listened to his point of view and reduced, even if I should have done it earlier!

Well done Porky, you called it right and probably saved some people a lot of money!

The short term does not look good nor does this statement inspire much confidence for the longer term.

'In addition, the Directors propose to seek additional authority to allot further Shares in the future to provide flexibility and to allow the Company some ability to take advantage of opportunities which may present themselves in the future'

I think we all know that it can not be dropped but I think many Sh are concerned that the next RNS will give notice of the meeting to vote on the placing. As has been said before, will we let them go bust or vote for the placing to try to recover something out of this?

Manifesto,

No problem, I hadn't missed the point you made, I was being polite in asking just in case you were serious.

Manifesto, you state......'.EUDA have shown Suzy how it should be done'

Have Euda announced something then, and if so could you post a link?

You would think that if there was great news on the final day of the due diligence for the merger that it would have been to a large fanfare from Euda.

Instead a deafening silence!

Very disappointing for me,I think the clue is in ' a small fee in shares' !

Hardly inspiring sign up is it.

Could you also forecast which year that would be?

So are you seriously suggesting that she will disclose confidential information (if she actually has any) about a company merger shat she does not have any responsibility for just to appease a few of our shareholders?

If you are, can you also ask that she details all insider facts she has about said merger so I can decide whether to buy in or sell? That would be most helpful.

I thought 8i Corp was the one with the $60 mill money following their IPO closure. My understanding is that they have taken on EUDA who as you say are hovering just above the $1 delisting threshold. EUDA are now a subsidiary of 8i and if the merger goes ahead then hopefully they will be able to call on the main money from the parent company of 8i.

Timing is everything of course.

But then you look at this opinion which shows 40 % sell for EUDA , it's a murky old world and these are just one small part of the research. We are going to find out very shortly though.

https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/EUDA/opinion

Put them up again then, but don't forget to reference where they came from?

They state in the forward statement that they will be relying on the interest as income so it is not being made available to Val .

Rightback,

Lets hope you are right, then I guess we will have to wait and hope that 201 is picked as one of the products thx will want to spend their new wealth on progressing.

Patientinvestor8,

Conversely, if Porky is right and there is a placing, and they don't get the money will you leave the BB as you have asked him to?

A lot is being said about the merger but the elephant in the room I suspect for lots of us, is this part of the LOI

'The completion of the merger is subject to various conditions, including the negotiation of a definitive agreement, regulatory approvals, and the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. There can be no assurance that the merger will be completed or that the proposed terms set forth in the letter of intent will remain unchanged.'

As an earlier poster said, it would restore confidence to LTH if any known facts were posted instead of hints and speculation.

So are you confirming that it is the subsidiary we are looking for and not EUDA, they do mention in the merger document that it is a subsidiary of EUDA that is merging .

Just providing balance, as paperprofits identified Porky9 posts over the last 30 days as 143, only fair to look at the other contenders.

Porky 9 = 143

Patient 8= 244

PM 22 =201

Keep up Porky 9!

You ask if anybody listens to Porky? Well it's hard to hear him above the noise from the other two!

Just for a bit of fun, number of posts on the Val BB over the last thirty days ( from the LSE stats).

Porky 8 = 92 posts

PM- = 130 posts

PI8 = 160 posts

And if as some suggest, that PM/PI8 are the same person, that amounts to 290 versus 92!

Sorry if I missed you off the total Iceman!

Just saying!

Paternostpauper, No problem, I get what you were doing and why, it was interesting to hear what she had to say. My point was that it was a typical legal answer saying very little other than the process Val would have to follow for a placing.

As a long term holder I certainly hope for news rather than any GM announcement.