RE: n4 tweet18 Oct 2016 11:42
When you read an email and something is missing you can only guess what is missing and why. You then start to imagine all sorts of hypothetical sinarios as to why what is missing is actually missing, and 9 times out of 10 we are wrong.
During a verbal conversation you are able to detect a meaning to what is being said. Even the silence tells a story.
What i'm waffeling on about is when I spoke to Gavin this morning I asked him if "Investment 2" would address the Investment policy issue, to which he replied blah, blah, blah " should that have gone ahead" blah,blah,blah.
Guess which bits stood out ? Am I detecting that it was going ahead and may not be now??
Also, in his words: " the issue may be addressed with a Reverse Take Over, or it may not be"
hmmmm.....still more blah,blah, blah, but why did he say that??
I detected a slower and stronger stance as he said that....almost a message within a message.
More than that I can not say, but like yourself my hunch tells me that the suspension is for a positive reason (imo) as he reassured me he knew it was coming.