Found group on Telegram, first and last letters are md. Only have 400,000 shares but I want to see this man brought to account
Or the way the IPO is presented ... if you don’t want it to succeed for any reason.
As a Director his duty is to work on behalf of the shareholders to create value, he is a paid (very highly paid) employee of the company responsible to shareholders.
Djwall1s, thank you for all your efforts in updating the board on the Q&A, very much appreciated, I don’t post often but do hold a significant number of shares from LION days
...and to say nothing of the extortionate salary and expenses he has taken over these six years
The RNS simply buys him time to spend the £5million
I wonder if any bookmaker will give me odds about what excuse CP will give tonight about not providing a relisting date?
I transferred my ISA, SIPP and Trading Account from HL to II and the total process took eight days, very impressed by both organisations.
I simply use Google Finance, they must be wrong if you say it is only 500k, I really don’t mind as long as we get a decent offer
1m sell at 7.85p timed t 9.02am
It was only on 20k shares traded
Hopefully forward sold to BP before 26 May!
You suggest that Hurrican will be sold to Harbour Energy for $400m, I cannot see Crystal Amber letting Hurrican go for 15p per share based upon free cash, tax rebates etc.
Daisy Roots, I echo your sentiments and likewise have been invested for the same period of time. We have some very highly paid Directors (Charles Hall, David Wergo excepted) and annual administrative charges in excess of £2.5m so it is no wonder the share price is struggling when these costs are compared to NAV. I continue to hold simply based upon future revenues from NSR. My concerns are that shareholders are not being kept informed which has led to frustration for many LTH who have simply sold up. I cannot recall when we last had a simple Q&A session. I also hate to think how much we have spent on legal fees over the past four years. I would like to think that the BOD are equally concerned about the lowly SP.
Not really much point as nothing that has been said in response to questions has ever come to fruition. His first duty should be to act on behalf of shareholders LOL
I note that the Judge was keen to highlight that Amigo had been the highest riser this year (to the giddy heights of around mid 20p's) citing this as one of his reasons for getting shareholders to contribute further (probably inferring a capital raise) however he conveniently forgets that many shareholders held at 300p with Amigo being one of the biggest losers SP wise over the previous year.