Member Info for Quady

Needalife this is pointless but

I don't need to address your other points they are rubbish.

I answered most of your rubbish.

What major shareholder sold out last week.

What are you on about.

Again needalife you're talking rubbish.

Lenin Moreno was in power before Lasso.

He was a socialist.

Yet he promoted mining.

You have no evidence for anything you say.

The country is pro mining.

You are saying things like because the UK has stop oil that the whole country supports stop oil and we are going to have every house insulated. Its complete rubbish.

You get protest groups in every country.

Needalife they are non questions.

If you believe they need answering then read up about Solgold.

NM still has a controlling interest in the company, and is still here.

BHP and NCM wanted him removed to take over the company with a cheap offer.

We have successfully defended every time.

Directors have been replaced as the company has evolved this is true of companies that change as they grow as different skillsets are required.

No main shareholder has bailed out. What are you on about.

No CEO has been removed by the shareholders.

You talk complete rubbish.

Needalife your talking rubbish.

Let's not forget if the left get into power in Ecuador they also support mining.

Also it took Solgold some considerable time to get it's water permit for Alpala because we had to demonstrate we would not contaminate the water basin.

The indigenous population supports Solgold.

They are buying into the project.

If you really believe what you post, I would sell up now and cut your losses. It would be the only sensible thing to do.

However you won't because you know you're talking rubbish.

Try taking an objective position.

There is risk in every situation.

Will copy and paste it in for you addicknt.

Solgold: a few things I infer from the last RNS: · “Management is internally evaluating a phased approach to the development of Cascabel with the intent to reduce upfront capital and shorten the development schedule.” & $25.4M shares held in a wholly owned subsidiary.

I agree with hubrishunter.

I don't know bubble.

But once we get the exploitation license, the one to construct Alpala. A new date is set.

Bubble we don't have a license for Cascabel, we have different licences that are for different aspects of developing Cascabel.

Which one are you referring to please.

Bubble which license are you on about expiring.

Good morning again bubble.

I have finished reading.

I can see why addicknt has taken his view.

But I think it is clear by now for everyone that has read it.

That the strategic review is key.

All the people on here that said the strategic review would never happen have been yet again been shown to be talking nonsense.

Looks like we are going to reduce the costs to get Alpala to production.

Now as we proceed, someone may want to make an offer, but that has always been the case.

So as I see it, very little has changed, apart from we advance Cascabel.

Thank you addicknt, I guess we await the strategic review.

Addicknt may I ask a question.

For the final licensing to be in place so that Solgold is in a go situation, doesn't the financing have to be in place.

Maybe this is what Rick Rule was alluding to.

Good morning bubble, you are contradicting yourself.

The Franco Nevada deal, was done to raise money and act as a deterrent to us being acquired.

Any purchaser would hate the deal.

That's why BHP tried to stop it.

I am currently reading the release in full at the moment.

Just stopped for a cup of tea.

But I suggest you read it.

Good morning addicknt, you may well be right.

However I thought they did a good job to reduce production costs in the last PFS, and from the sound of the strategic review, they are looking at reducing them further.

Don't know if you remember they were looking at an open cut with higher grade nearer the surface to get income rolling in.

From memory I believe it was Tandy.

I wonder if the strategic review is looking at this as an option.

Good morning Italian.

I was referring to this part.

Management is internally evaluating a phased approach to the development of Cascabel with the intent to reduce upfront capital and shorten the development schedule.

Also if we can get the start up costs to just over 1 billion.

Then when Ingo was around, he said we have that sum of money ready to go.

Agreed you would normally require a BFS after a DFS.

But their are other ways to fund Cascabel.

Agreed addicknt, the strategic review is going to show us the renewed company direction.

Looks like we are going for a cheaper version to bring Alpala to production at first glance, but haven't read it yet.

SharketMare I don't disappear, I just post less frequently these days.

As far as I am aware, it's not in an RNS, but was mentioned in the last webinar.

SharketMare we know that the strategic review is about how to advance Cascabel.

It's about financing and planing.

As Rick Rule recently said, we need to put the finance in place before anyone would be interested in buying us.

That is what the strategic review is about.

It's about advancing Cascabel.

Addicknt, for all we know, they may have had one person working on it and then you have the checking.

Plus this was when we had COVID.