RE: Meeting18 Mar 2026 14:04
Was wondering if they have been speaking a bit too much, and out of line, what 3 interviews very recently? Is it a reason they had to push back meeting. They were a bit vague? They did have to file again with transcripts of "discussions" Seems a bit of a silly mistake. There is PR and then again......the rules are very strict and they did say an awful lot about projections etc. Hmmmm sure there won't be a problem. But could have done without it and had meeting done and dusted and be on NASDAQ now.
Thinking about it now wonder if it was this that caused the sudden drop, meeting pushed back and why rather than a silly "wrong" comment by Price?
2. Post-Announcement, Pre-Closing Stage (After DA)
Once the merger is publicly announced (the DA is signed), public discussion is allowed, but it is heavily regulated:
"Gun-Jumping" Rules: The SEC prohibits public statements that go beyond what is in the filed disclosures. Parties cannot distribute marketing materials or make public projections without filing them with the SEC first.
No Free Writing: Because SPACs are considered "ineligible issuers" or "blank check companies" under SEC rules, they are restricted from using free writing prospectuses (common promotional materials) in the same way traditional IPOs might.
Mandatory Disclosures: All public communications about the merger must be filed with the SEC, and a detailed proxy statement (Form S-4/F-4) must be made available to shareholders before they vote on the deal.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
