Member Info for PrivateRyan

So we’re the investors in the last placing at 9 p if memory serves. I am afraid it is not looking good. Pathetic turnover for a world leader year on year. Six more months to prove the tech earns from my perspective. Look at seeing machines ! That is the example of a world leader in a soecialist area now growing exponentially. Cpx has failed so far but maybe it’s just all cheap as chips and never will make huge money. Ps where is that big mouth Claretjay? Clues are all there !

maybe I am the desperate one seaview!-clutching at straws and constantly adding.! I hope I am right-I guess I was bowled over by the efficiency gains in the pilot and thought trusts would not be able to resist the product . I have consoled myself with the thought that covid is disrupting the Trusts' procurement /implementation .But as you say it would be good to get a couple more deals in the pipeline..

great find l r 2 ! maybe texrad will end up our saviour- that would be a laugh-being right for the wrong reason...cheers

now to sit back and wait ..............................I have a few like this so patience being tested.

Has it got a c e mark and the U.K. post Brexit equivalent ?

I disagree things are looking desperate. Tom assured us news is coming and lots going on. Watch this space I think he said.
The trading volume is very low ,and I suspect these are smaller holders who are worried about stop losses. In my view the prospects are still excellent and I will be holding for at least a year to see how it pans out ,unless of course there is some dramatic negative news. No news is that - its not bad news lol! I would have thought they might make inroads into private healthcare given they can afford it and also the clients have the money to sue if there is a misdiagnosis based on poor imaging.... Its a shame btw that stonechecker in iqai doesnt seem to have taken off- that uses texrad. Perhaps trevor brown should look at his iqai performance instead of criticising Feedback in the other place!

And a dustpan and brush. ! Great day !

cnbc says q has made a 4.6 bn dollar bid for veoneer starting a bidding war .

No income I suspect. We will see

yes i have fond memories of those days and david smith as the honest frontman .Hoping for a surge on news soon plum !

last year these came out on 7 august ,but previous 3 years were mid sep ,late sep and 17 august .So we should get some news over the next few weeks at the latest. Sorely needed!

this was on the same page as pro larva mask when i searched. somebody please tell me we are licensing to the german manufactuer !!!!!if not we are falling behind
HARD FFP2 Face Mask 20 pcs, Made in Germany EN 149:2001+A:2009 Certified Masks, Antibacterial Copper Nano Technology Filters 99,5%, NOT INDIVIDUALLY PACKED – White
Roll over image to zoom in
HARD FFP2 Face Mask 20 pcs, Made in Germany EN 149:2001+A:2009 Certified Masks, Antibacterial Copper Nano Technology Filters 99,5%, NOT INDIVIDUALLY PACKED – White

I refer to you previous post “bye bye single digits. “ How you have the gall to then say it’s the share that keeps on giving is beyond me but so many people on these boards have no sense of embarrassment and keep spouting the same old rubbish. This share keeps on taking !!

thanks IB -you are right but if I were Tom I would suggest to nhsx that they make that point about the diagnostic purpose clearly as it is unclear at the moment or at least incomplete.
cheers

thanks for that info. I have copied an extract below. What I do not understand is how the nhsx can say that the suppliers have met all legislative requirements given that Tom is saying that without a CE mark you cannot send medical images? Anyone understand that?If Tom is reading this maybe he could tweet an explanation? Maybe its just all legislative requirements in a particular procurement context , or just plain wrong. But it is one of the main planks of Tom's pitch so a bit worrying if it is not clear to the buyers? hey ho.

The suppliers have been assessed to ensure that they meet all legislative requirements, therefore no formal tendering is required, saving valuable time and money in the procurement process.

I succumbed again with another 500 k buy today. Tom said in the last but one video that there was lots going on he wanted to convey I don’t think that vets contract is all there is. I trust Tom but I am now 7m shares in and I hope that is it. !! Otherwise the divorce looms. Some great research on the other site btw. Thanks v m

They are rns reach . by definition it means they are not material. This is the share that keeps on taking ! "cheap as chips" AK once said about a category of his s cs I think the trouble is they are all cheap as chips.......very disappointing

thanks oldfool- I hadn't seen this one either-great research on here chaps thanks vm all of you -never a dull moment.

I agree lr2. In the early stages he emphasised that bleepa would be very affordable ie a few pounds per month per user-he likened it to a mobile phone contract We need scale to press on to significant levels of profit but the tech is supposed to be eminently scalable at little incremental cost.
Cheers.
Very low volume still I notice. Too many of us sticking with large shareholdings!

great -thanks barnacle and thanks l r 2 for that background. my optimism remains ....

low volume . i hope we get a video.Tom said he had lots to convey in the last vid. I am also keeping all my shares- this deal shows the technology is desirable -we just need more contracts .They should come .

excellent research IB thanks v m