Member Info for poshify

"Another wannabee instant millionaire"

Nope, simply establishing for other readers the fact that it's a trading share only, you can't hold it

I hope it gets bought out personally, can't go anywhere with present BOD and loss making business model

Thanks for the patronizing lecture. You misunderstand my point which is that their business strategy is not attractive for investors. Pre-selling then the overhang, MM games all in store, the next placing within 12 months. VR no an investor is not

"Investor

An investor is a person who allocates financial capital with the expectation of a future return or to gain an advantage.

No time period specified, could be 10 mins or 10 years the choice is yours.

Unbelievable that I need to explain the basics:

From Investopedia

Investing vs. Trading: What's the Difference?

By Jean Folger Updated May 29, 2024

Reviewed by Charles Potters

Fact checked by Kirsten Rohrs Schmitt

Part of the Series

How to Invest with Confidence

Investing vs. Trading: An Overview

Investing and trading are two different methods of attempting to profit in the financial markets. Both investors and traders seek profits through market participation. Investors generally seek larger returns over an extended period through buying and holding. Traders, by contrast, take advantage of both rising and falling markets to enter and exit positions over a shorter time frame, taking smaller, more frequent profits.

Key Takeaways

Investing takes a long-term approach to the markets and often applies to such purposes as retirement accounts.

Trading involves short-term strategies to maximize returns daily, monthly, or quarterly.

Investors are more likely to ride out short-term losses, while traders will attempt to make transactions that can help them profit quickly from fluctuating markets.

Yeah right. so their plans for scaling up to make those sales are almost entirely reliant on shafting PIs every 6 months or so for a couple of mil.

Why do I not see this as a either a robust growth strategy or attractive to investors?

The take home from this Trick or Treat fluckery is don't hold this share as an investment or for more than about 4 months after a placing.

How they hope to build their SP from here is anyone's guess.

They are hoes, but exactly, "Next...Next...

Crack hoes

this was traded back down to here against the positive fundamentals. so starting to call a recovery in the sp a dead cat bounce is trash talking the co. schurter buying in the 30s tells you all you need to know about it's real value. they hold, loser idiots and 10 pc crack *****s sell

You define the term troll

Company doing very well, only the SP in decline

Contrary to the fundamentals and market outlook

No idea why you love it, you sad sad man

Rodger, you're not invested here, you have absolutely no credentials to comment as you demonstrably got everything wrong obsessively posting your negative w4nk before Cooley bought in. Not invested and getting your sad kicks trying to lose people money, seemingly for no other reason than to think about buying at 0.10 and hope for 0.20. At which point you'll probably end up spiked again. You are the zero in sum. GTFO this board and don't come back

Relentless profit taking and weak sellers who don't understand or care what investment is. This causes bearish signals and the share becomes a short trade. The future is bright here but the market is lousy

Schurter took 5% end of July when the SP was 0.3 - 0.35. Any of you spouting about placings, how is diluting them a plan?

Anywhere outside the UK is great unless you're in war zone. That's my holiday chat

They need cash to invest in scaling up so they can make a profit. Why is a placing at these low levels a business plan? Diluting Schurter surely, lowers investor confidence still further, depresses SP. Couldn't generate what is needed anyway.

In a long game of what investors like Dr Cooley and Schurter call investment they are looking at were they are heading, not the fine detail of whether or not the BOD over-promised on patents.

It's going down because of relentless profit-taking putting off PIs, then more holders get shaken out, then you have bearish signals and short positions and so on. Plus it's been manipulated down by MMs and off-loading. The outlook is bullish, the sentiment is bearish purely due to market action

The SP now is the same as after the profit take the day after Cooley went to 11%

We look at the significantly improved fundamentals from there and the high growth outlook for supercaps.

And we can see that trading the knackers off this instead of investing even medium term has forced bearish signals so it's now a short trade.

AIM traders would absolutely have strangled Bitcoin at birth had it been listed

I'm reading the Chat Rules and assume this applies to Earls manipulative and false B/S

You will not post misleading or false statements regarding the share price and performance. Such posts are deemed as market abuse, and may be reported to the appropriate authorities.

I agree, this sale arrangement allows the buyer to keep the Beckham branding. Without that the business is a non-entity

Thanks Analyser, so you're saying the PLC with no assets would just be a cash shell? Does an asset sale need a SH vote?

As this is an asset sale and not a share sale what happens to the shares?

Why wouldn't they raise as nearly out of cash.