RE: RNS Business update 05/12/202519 Dec 2025 16:01
Ricey- you sound surprised. He lives for this board as the sole custodian of righteousness. We all need to do the same when he fabicates and distorts RNS to his own ends that are actually in the public domain.
RE: RNS Business update 05/12/202519 Dec 2025 13:05
Mikey "Predicting Doom Without Counter-Evidence: Repetition amplifies fear"
Predicting revenue in 20245 and 2025 without evidence amplifies doommongering. FACT
4 years last October I was invested. Maybe thats not long enough for some actual 'real world' evidence of what they've achieved and revenue generation?
RE: RNS Business update 05/12/202511 Dec 2025 19:34
Mikey
Rating: Content is 95% bulls***/snivelling
Posting style: a bit like the BBC Trump speech, missing important chunks if RNSs
Activity patterns: calling legitimate posts false and so reports to the headmaster.100s of posts daily arguing about this 'dog of a share' with zero evidence to back it up except the 'words' of the ceo. Data that not a single person can verify.Abusing constantly with posts like the one below.
Acting like every other alias you have ever had on here.
Coordinating with cloud cuckoo land to find a positive about this share.
Whatever is said in the releases it is deliberately vague in every way.
It allows anyone to make their own opinion.
There is nothing of substance in them that would make people take an interest. Case in point, last RNS.
My point posting the link this morning was that LSE claim these boards are the wild west but they are doing nothing to bring companies to account for false promises of future wealth, thereby enabling them to do so.
Official RNS are worth diddly on AIM. Why have they not brought companies to book for promising revenue in 2024 when that was sent through official/regulatory news releases?